
by Iuuvic » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:18 pm

by Conserative Morality » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:21 pm

by Iuuvic » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:24 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Oh no, we're doing what we've been doing for thousands of years, but IN LABS NOW! We actually KNOW how they're going to turn out! Obviously knowledge is bad and so forth."
Pretty much sums up my ideas on the anti-GM types, and thus gives you a good idea on how I feel on GMs.

by Takaram » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:24 pm
Lordieth wrote:I'm not against genetic modification, I just worry about abnormalities and crossbreeding with non-GM crops. It's still an infant science.

by Takaram » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:25 pm
Iuuvic wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:"Oh no, we're doing what we've been doing for thousands of years, but IN LABS NOW! We actually KNOW how they're going to turn out! Obviously knowledge is bad and so forth."
Pretty much sums up my ideas on the anti-GM types, and thus gives you a good idea on how I feel on GMs.
I agree but don't know that its fair to link modern genetics to selective breeding. What we do now in labs with genomes is more than leaps and bounds could describe.

by Unchecked Expansion » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:26 pm

by Iuuvic » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:27 pm
Takaram wrote:Iuuvic wrote:
I agree but don't know that its fair to link modern genetics to selective breeding. What we do now in labs with genomes is more than leaps and bounds could describe.
That's all it is, just even more selective. Instead of having to cross-breed two organisms for generations to get a perfect food crop, we can do it in one generation by swapping a few genes around.

by Takaram » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:29 pm
Iuuvic wrote:Takaram wrote:That's all it is, just even more selective. Instead of having to cross-breed two organisms for generations to get a perfect food crop, we can do it in one generation by swapping a few genes around.
Not quite, the two organisms need no compatibility when dealing with single genomes. Can now take genes from plants and animals of different species and mix them. Selective breeding is very limited to compatibility.

by Conserative Morality » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:29 pm
Unchecked Expansion wrote:I'd eat GM food over Organic labelled junk any day. GM has a metric ton of regulation. Organic is pretty much just a brand name with no official regulation.
Organic is dumping a bacteria all over your fields because it produces a pesticide and only has a moderate chance of becoming a stomach bug. GM is just taking the pesticide out of the bacteria, expressing it in the plant and being certain not to be a stomach bug

by Takaram » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:30 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Unchecked Expansion wrote:I'd eat GM food over Organic labelled junk any day. GM has a metric ton of regulation. Organic is pretty much just a brand name with no official regulation.
Organic is dumping a bacteria all over your fields because it produces a pesticide and only has a moderate chance of becoming a stomach bug. GM is just taking the pesticide out of the bacteria, expressing it in the plant and being certain not to be a stomach bug
But If It's Natural It's Good. Like Arsenic. Arsenic is natural, right?

by Unchecked Expansion » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:31 pm
Iuuvic wrote:
Not quite, the two organisms need no compatibility when dealing with single genomes. Can now take genes from plants and animals of different species and mix them. Selective breeding is very limited to compatibility.

by Conserative Morality » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:32 pm
Takaram wrote:So is lead... and smallpox.

by Unchecked Expansion » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:33 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:But If It's Natural It's Good. Like Arsenic. Arsenic is natural, right?

by Xarithis » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:34 pm

by Moral Libertarians » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:35 pm
Terra Agora wrote:A state, no matter how small, is not liberty. Taxes are not liberty, government courts are not liberty, government police are not liberty. Anarchy is liberty and anarchy is order.

by Avenio » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:36 pm

by Takaram » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:36 pm
Xarithis wrote:I'm all for it.
In fact, I'm so for it, that I believe that the far more efficient GM crops should eventually completely replace "organic" crops.

by Seperate Vermont » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:38 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Ecotoria, El Lazaro, EuroStralia, La Xinga, New Temecula, PouchiLand, Reloviskistan, Shrillland, Sllonsonnopia, The Two Jerseys, TheKeyToJoy, Westinor, Zarbik
Advertisement