by Prismos » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:37 am
by Fson » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:42 am
by Call to power » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:55 am
by New Manvir » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:55 am
by Call to power » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:59 am
New Manvir wrote:I've entirely stopped caring about both sides of this pointless conflict.
by New Manvir » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:03 pm
by Greater Tezdrian » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:12 pm
by Ashmoria » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:18 pm
Prismos wrote:Erm, have I not stated pre-67 borders?
by Call to power » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:23 pm
New Manvir wrote:Really?
New Manvir wrote:I think I could pass myself off as Arab...
Greater Tezdrian wrote:No, there is and has never been a Palestinian state or people. Israel is the only legit state that occupies that land.
by Angleter » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:29 pm
by Greater Tezdrian » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:32 pm
by Angleter » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:36 pm
Greater Tezdrian wrote:The Arabs have their own states. Egypt, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Jordan... the list goes on. They're are Arabs and aren't different from any other Arab. Israel and Jews is a different kettle of fish.
by Risottia » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:39 pm
Prismos wrote:The Palestinian Authority are going to make a unilateral declaration of independance in September rallying support from nation to recognise it. Isn't it about time the World recognised the State of Palestine on 67 borders?
by Prismos » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:45 pm
Angleter wrote:No. We should wait until an actual peace settlement and the creation of an actual Palestinian State first. Of course, I have my own reservations since I don't believe in a two-state solution. The only way to give the Jews their Jewish state and the Arabs their Arab one, to ensure stability in the region and to satiate Israel's security concerns, and to give the Palestinian Arabs their best chance of prosperity, is to have a three-state solution.
Thereby Egypt annexes Gaza and Jordan the West Bank (with hefty compensation for their assumption of responsibility for the areas), a population exchange is made between the Jewish settlers who'd rather be Israeli and the Arab Israelis who'd rather live in an Arab state, the minorities in both states are guaranteed protection and full rights, and Israel keeps East Jerusalem (otherwise they'll never accept a peace deal, and the Jordanians are probably more likely than the PNA to make such a concession).
Oh, and if the PNA really are going to go UDI in September, then they're complete bloody idiots.
by Greater Tezdrian » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:46 pm
Prismos wrote:Ethnically cleanse "Eretz Israel" and the Western Mandate.
by Prismos » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:47 pm
Angleter wrote:Greater Tezdrian wrote:The Arabs have their own states. Egypt, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Jordan... the list goes on. They're are Arabs and aren't different from any other Arab. Israel and Jews is a different kettle of fish.
I'd dispute this, since I believe that Arabs are fooling themselves when they proclaim a single identity (of course, this single identity is conveniently dropped when they talk of 'the Palestinians'), but the Gazans are no different dialectically/linguistically from Sinaians/East Egyptians, nor are the West Bankers from other Levantine Arabs, especially Jordanians.
by Angleter » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:50 pm
Prismos wrote:Angleter wrote:No. We should wait until an actual peace settlement and the creation of an actual Palestinian State first. Of course, I have my own reservations since I don't believe in a two-state solution. The only way to give the Jews their Jewish state and the Arabs their Arab one, to ensure stability in the region and to satiate Israel's security concerns, and to give the Palestinian Arabs their best chance of prosperity, is to have a three-state solution.
Thereby Egypt annexes Gaza and Jordan the West Bank (with hefty compensation for their assumption of responsibility for the areas), a population exchange is made between the Jewish settlers who'd rather be Israeli and the Arab Israelis who'd rather live in an Arab state, the minorities in both states are guaranteed protection and full rights, and Israel keeps East Jerusalem (otherwise they'll never accept a peace deal, and the Jordanians are probably more likely than the PNA to make such a concession).
Oh, and if the PNA really are going to go UDI in September, then they're complete bloody idiots.
That's a Zionist dream.
Ethnically cleanse "Eretz Israel" and the Western Mandate.
by Greater Tezdrian » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:51 pm
Prismos wrote:Palestinians genetically and historically.
by Angleter » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:54 pm
Prismos wrote:Angleter wrote:
I'd dispute this, since I believe that Arabs are fooling themselves when they proclaim a single identity (of course, this single identity is conveniently dropped when they talk of 'the Palestinians'), but the Gazans are no different dialectically/linguistically from Sinaians/East Egyptians, nor are the West Bankers from other Levantine Arabs, especially Jordanians.
Incorrect Gazan "Arabs" are the same as West Bank "Arabs", Palestinians genetically and historically.
by Greater Tezdrian » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:57 pm
Prismos wrote:Greater Tezdrian wrote:FAIL. There has never been a historic Palestinian identity, nor an ethnic one beyond superfluous tribal differences.
FAIL on your side.
The Palestinian identity pre-dates modern Israel. It has been shaped by Palestinian nationalism but there is evidence of Palestinian identity within the British mandate.
by Prismos » Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:04 pm
Angleter wrote:Prismos wrote:
Incorrect Gazan "Arabs" are the same as West Bank "Arabs", Palestinians genetically and historically.
Er, no. Take a look at this map of the Arab peoples. Look very close at Gaza. What colour is Gaza? Oh look, it's pale green! What else is pale green? That's right, Sinai and East Egypt! Granted, a small part of the West Bank and of the Aqaba region are also light green, but these little border discrepancies are replicated across the map (some Algerians speaking Moroccan Darija and vice versa, large parts of Egypt being Libyan-speaking, etc.).
The "Palestinian" cultural bloc came into existence only really after the creation of the Mandate of Palestine in 1921, and only became popularised after the rise of Israel in the late '40s. Genetically, I think you could appreciate that the whole Southern Levant (Sinai, Israel/Palestine, Jordan, and parts of Syria) is going to have a roughly similar genetic background (Jews included), and it's ludicrous to suggest that there is going to be any big genetic difference within the borders of the Western Mandate.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, El Lazaro, Google [Bot], Hammer Britannia, Maximum Imperium Rex, Merien, Plan Neonie, Shrillland, The Jay Republic, Tungstan, Wisteria and Surrounding Territories
Advertisement