by The Cat-Tribe » Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:48 pm
by Athiests4AnimalRights » Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:53 pm
by Greed and Death » Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:55 pm
by Soviet Haaregrad » Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:56 pm
by Galenaima » Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:58 pm
Oterro wrote:I read it in Latest Forum Topics and was like; ''oho, some chap managed to keep himself seated for 2 years and finally stood up!''
But no. Morbidly obese man dies in chair, covered in shit.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:Is Hell North Korea off earth?
Wikkiwallana wrote:I don't like flamish anyone. It distresses me to see people on fire. People who like to get involved with their own gender don't bother me at all though.
by Swkoll » Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:58 pm
by Jeux II » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:00 pm
by Offenheim » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:03 pm
by Occupied Deutschland » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:04 pm
greed and death wrote:Because my concept of the commerce clause dates to the 1920's.
by The Rich Port » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:04 pm
Galenaima wrote:It forces you to buy something--you'd think the left would be up in arms at people having to buy from a massive corporation.
by Bluth Corporation » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:05 pm
Offenheim wrote:However, I recognize that states often create a situation like this in regards to drivers' insurance
by Bluth Corporation » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:06 pm
by Auremena » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:06 pm
by Wamitoria » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:06 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:Offenheim wrote:However, I recognize that states often create a situation like this in regards to drivers' insurance
Because obviously, requiring liability coverage for the damage you might cause to others as a condition of operating a motor vehicle is completely comparable to requiring coverage for your own well-being as a condition of being alive.
by Jeux II » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:08 pm
Auremena wrote:It's just the GOP being stupid like usual, saying anything they don't like is unconstitutional.
by Syvorji » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:08 pm
by Whiskey Hill » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:09 pm
by Auremena » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:09 pm
It's like a little kid, when they do something wrong, or get in trouble, they say "It's not fair!" even when it's completely fair.
by The Currency » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:09 pm
Hetalia Switzerland wrote:Because you are forced to buy something.
by Bluth Corporation » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:10 pm
Wamitoria wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:
Because obviously, requiring liability coverage for the damage you might cause to others as a condition of operating a motor vehicle is completely comparable to requiring coverage for your own well-being as a condition of being alive.
How about you just say why you think it's unconstitutional than nitpick at everyone's defense of the bill?
by Jeux II » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:10 pm
Hetalia Switzerland wrote:Because you are forced to buy something.
by Caecili » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:10 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Dimetrodon Empire, Fartsniffage, Haganham, Omphalos, Rio Cana, Shearoa, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP, Tungstan, Uiiop
Advertisement