Advertisement
by Calderax » Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:15 am
by Delegate Vinage » Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:45 am
by Luethdno » Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:31 am
by Computeropia » Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:50 am
AFFIRMS the right of member-states to grant broader appellate rights than those mandated by this resolution and to place a reasonable ceiling on the number of appeals that a convict may lodge.
by New Matawan » Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:42 am
by Ossitania » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:50 am
Calderax wrote:It is an undue strain on the Great Nation of Calderax's court systems to allow convicted felons to appeal, all of whom, thanks to our stellar and competent executive system, we know are guilty. So, truly, this legislation is NOT about increasing rights. It's about bankrupting nations in more and more red tape. If you have a problem with proper justice in your nations, then I suggest you look at the way in which you govern or what kind of ignorant cultural background your nations people hail from. But in the Great Calderax, we are complete and efficient in our justice and have no need of this useless legislation.
Calderax votes AGAINST.
Luethdno wrote:The Republic of Luethdno has decided to vote against this resolution, though it is fair to many people the people of Luethdno do not want to take the risk of letting a person that may still be guilty and may commit again out in the public, alongside this we use our prisoners as apart of our working state, so it's a no on all levels.
Computeropia wrote:AFFIRMS the right of member-states to grant broader appellate rights than those mandated by this resolution and to place a reasonable ceiling on the number of appeals that a convict may lodge.
It seems to me that any nation can negate the entire wording of this resolution by claiming a "resonable ceiling" on the number of appeals can be set at "one" in their own nation. There would be no uniformity between nations. One nation may allow 5 chances and another 1.
by Whipporwill » Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:08 am
Ossitania wrote:Calderax wrote:Your judiciary is what decides whether appeals are heard or not. If your oh-so-perfect justice system is really as great as you claim, then surely you have judges who are competent enough to dismiss applications to have an appeal heard by pointing out that your system leaves no question of guilt and its perfection would surely extend to making sure there were no procedural errors during the trial, meaning that convicts in your country would have no grounds to appeal as they would all be definitively guilty.
by Ossitania » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:42 am
by Fritzergald » Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:49 pm
A violent Revolution will only destroy, and divide. The Revolution, must be from within
by Goobergunchia » Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:54 pm
by Ossitania » Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:56 pm
Fritzergald wrote:This will completely destroy WA nations who have the Most Extreme governments. You are just trying to get dictators on you!
by New Matawan » Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:44 pm
Calderax wrote:It is an undue strain on the Great Nation of Calderax's court systems to allow convicted felons to appeal, all of whom, thanks to our stellar and competent executive system, we know are guilty. So, truly, this legislation is NOT about increasing rights. It's about bankrupting nations in more and more red tape. If you have a problem with proper justice in your nations, then I suggest you look at the way in which you govern or what kind of ignorant cultural background your nations people hail from. But in the Great Calderax, we are complete and efficient in our justice and have no need of this useless legislation.
Calderax votes AGAINST.
by Not Kony Run Uganda » Sun Jun 10, 2012 7:44 pm
by Goobergunchia » Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:40 pm
by Federal Republic of Zimbabwe » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:33 am
by Lenzum » Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:04 pm
by Ossitania » Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:02 pm
Lenzum wrote:The Grand Empire of Lenzum will be voting NAY on the resolution as it stands.
Why? There is one simple reason - the death penalty would prevent HIM Lenzar III and his government from being able to comply,
by Gelattia » Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:37 pm
by Damanucus » Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:02 pm
Gelattia wrote:The Republic of Gelattia would vote for this if it could. Unfortunately, Topdop has voted against. We implore them to vote for. Anyone who votes against this resolution doesn't care about their people.
by Libraria and Ausitoria » Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:43 am
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]
by Quelesh » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:16 am
by Knootoss » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:45 am
by Merfurian » Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:19 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement