by Bergnovinaia » Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:48 pm
by Occultototus » Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:18 pm
by The Obamanator » Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:26 pm
Occultototus wrote:I believe this should be ammended to include that no nation may place military installations, keep prisoners or store weaponry etc. at a site that is recognised as "Cultural Heritage".
by Goobergunchia » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:08 pm
by Delibera » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:20 pm
by Goobergunchia » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:42 pm
Delibera wrote:This resolution fails to define what a "cultural heritage site" is. Unless there are requirements as to what one may be, I can in no way agree to this.
by Northern Fury » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:43 pm
Delibera wrote:This resolution fails to define what a "cultural heritage site" is. Unless there are requirements as to what one may be, I can in no way agree to this.
DEFINES a cultural heritage site as a area of interest, archeological, historical, or cultural to any member nation within its own jurdisticion.
by Mad Sheep Railgun » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:02 pm
by Quelesh » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:46 am
Occultototus wrote:I believe this should be ammended to include that no nation may place military installations, keep prisoners or store weaponry etc. at a site that is recognised as "Cultural Heritage".
by La Nueva Roma » Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:49 am
by Tsukasa-chan » Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:50 am
Bergnovinaia wrote:ENCOURAGES member states to:
a) Make historical artifacts accessible to the public where possible
by Massachussets Bay » Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:07 am
La Nueva Roma wrote:The Republic of La Nueva Roma has voted against this proposal.
In particular, we take issue with the following:
- International law banning "blocking" monuments from citizens of other countries: THIS IS PREPOSTEROUS. In Saudi Arabia, non-Muslims are banned from entering the holy city of Mecca. The World Assembly would, in effect, be passing a law that overrides a religious restriction of the world's second largest religion.
- Requirement of national legislation in member nations of the WA for the same.
La Nueva Roma strongly urges fellow member nations of the WA to vote AGAINST the current resolution.
by Philimbesi » Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:31 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:59 am
by The Obamanator » Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:03 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I must admit that it could be better but at least it no longer mandates the transferring all monuments into public property upon passing. Under the public referendum rules, the Charlotte Ryberg honoured ambassador's vote is dependent on the outcome of the referendum results, the polls which close at 2200 GMT tonight and should be revealed by tomorrow morning. Although we are quite confident of this resolution passing the population really has the final say.
by Philimbesi » Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:39 am
I must admit that it could be better but at least it no longer mandates the transferring all monuments into public property upon passing. Under the public referendum rules, the Charlotte Ryberg honoured ambassador's vote is dependent on the outcome of the referendum results, the polls which close at 2200 GMT tonight and should be revealed by tomorrow morning. Although we are quite confident of this resolution passing the population really has the final say.
by Unibotian WASC Mission » Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:43 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:53 am
Philimbesi wrote:I must admit that it could be better but at least it no longer mandates the transferring all monuments into public property upon passing. Under the public referendum rules, the Charlotte Ryberg honoured ambassador's vote is dependent on the outcome of the referendum results, the polls which close at 2200 GMT tonight and should be revealed by tomorrow morning. Although we are quite confident of this resolution passing the population really has the final say.
One would wonder why such a vote and a disclaimer is required on a resolution the Honored Ambassador is recognized as the co-author on?
by The Obamanator » Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:00 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Philimbesi wrote:I must admit that it could be better but at least it no longer mandates the transferring all monuments into public property upon passing. Under the public referendum rules, the Charlotte Ryberg honoured ambassador's vote is dependent on the outcome of the referendum results, the polls which close at 2200 GMT tonight and should be revealed by tomorrow morning. Although we are quite confident of this resolution passing the population really has the final say.
One would wonder why such a vote and a disclaimer is required on a resolution the Honored Ambassador is recognized as the co-author on?
The honoured ambassador has been figuring how democratic a nation would have to be to become perfect democratic utopia at an international stage. At least corruption has been minimised since we replaced the compliance gnomes last week: anyway, a balance has to be struck between the effects of the economy and preserving the success of the economy too.
Yours etc,
by Philimbesi » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:18 pm
by The Palentine » Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:28 pm
by Amfas » Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:14 pm
by Unibotian WASC Mission » Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:23 pm
by Charlotte Ryberg » Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:23 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement