Advertisement
by Greenlandic People » Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:26 pm
by Providynce » Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:26 pm
Pai Lei wrote:The United Isles of Pai Lei supports any resolution that will result in the repeal of protection of monuments. The WA has no right to tell nations what they can or cannot do with their own infrastructure.
by Grays Harbor » Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:29 pm
Picobella wrote:Why would we repeal a resolution that is there to protect monuments. Monuments are a part of our history, not as individual nations, but as a species. By repealing this sanction, are we going to allow nations in times of war, to blatantly desecrate our sacred icons, monuments, and memorials? We enacted this resolution to help us remember our past, and now it seems as though we do not even remember why we enacted this resolution. My friends, the delegates of the World Assembly, ask yourselves, would you like your nations monuments blatantly desecrated?
by Unibot » Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:50 pm
CREATES the Monument Assessment Committee to asses the monuments being proposed for the World Assembly Monuments Register so that they are of actual historical importance, and not selected as a way of protecting people.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Vatiel » Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:04 pm
by Caroine » Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:33 pm
by The Halseyist Faction » Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:15 pm
by Grays Harbor » Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:43 pm
The Halseyist Faction wrote:The Halseyist Faction votes for scrapping this ridicious piece of legislation, as we already remarked we would. However, we find it both saddening, and amusing, that this legisaltion was passed, not one week ago, by a sizeable number of votes. If, within that same week, a repeal is passed, perhaps again by a sizeable number of votes, does this not suggest that this assembly is just blindly voting for every measure that comes it's way? The amount of votes that are declared and arguements that are felt in this chamber, are insignificant in perportion to the silent voters that keep mindlessly tapping yes to whatever garbage comes along.
by New Olwe » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:21 pm
Picobella wrote:Why would we repeal a resolution that is there to protect monuments. Monuments are a part of our history, not as individual nations, but as a species. By repealing this sanction, are we going to allow nations in times of war, to blatantly desecrate our sacred icons, monuments, and memorials? We enacted this resolution to help us remember our past, and now it seems as though we do not even remember why we enacted this resolution. My friends, the delegates of the World Assembly, ask yourselves, would you like your nations monuments blatantly desecrated?
by Grays Harbor » Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:27 am
by Allbeama » Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:42 am
by Enn » Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:53 am
Allbeama wrote:Is this a repeal intended to stop the protection of monuments or is a better proposal to safeguard national historical sites the goal here?
Edit: It seems that you have answered this. As it stands I support this resolution, but I am curious regarding what your planned proposal will look like. I hope it adequately handles an issue that is of great concern to my people. Thank you.
by Grays Harbor » Sun Nov 08, 2009 3:02 am
Enn wrote:Allbeama wrote:Is this a repeal intended to stop the protection of monuments or is a better proposal to safeguard national historical sites the goal here?
Edit: It seems that you have answered this. As it stands I support this resolution, but I am curious regarding what your planned proposal will look like. I hope it adequately handles an issue that is of great concern to my people. Thank you.
Philembesi, who proposed this repeal, does not have a planned replacement. Nor are they required to. However, there is discussion of one possible replacement, by another person, which can be found here.
by Grays Harbor » Sun Nov 08, 2009 3:08 am
Allbeama wrote:Is this a repeal intended to stop the protection of monuments or is a better proposal to safeguard national historical sites the goal here?
Edit: It seems that you have answered this. As it stands I support this resolution, but I am curious regarding what your planned proposal will look like. I hope it adequately handles an issue that is of great concern to my people. Thank you.
by Enn » Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:12 am
Grays Harbor wrote:Enn wrote:Allbeama wrote:Is this a repeal intended to stop the protection of monuments or is a better proposal to safeguard national historical sites the goal here?
Edit: It seems that you have answered this. As it stands I support this resolution, but I am curious regarding what your planned proposal will look like. I hope it adequately handles an issue that is of great concern to my people. Thank you.
Philembesi, who proposed this repeal, does not have a planned replacement. Nor are they required to. However, there is discussion of one possible replacement, by another person, which can be found here.
proposed jointly with Grays Harbor. hmmpf. We worked it out together.
by Bears Armed » Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:03 am
Picobella wrote:Why would we repeal a resolution that is there to protect monuments. Monuments are a part of our history, not as individual nations, but as a species.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:28 am
Bears Armed wrote:Picobella wrote:Why would we repeal a resolution that is there to protect monuments. Monuments are a part of our history, not as individual nations, but as a species.
"Which species?"
Borrin o Redwood,
Chief Observer at the World Assembly
for
The High Council of Clans,
The Confederated Clans of the Free Bears of Bears Armed.
by A mean old man » Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:35 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:39 am
by Krioval » Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:28 pm
Picobella wrote:Why would we repeal a resolution that is there to protect monuments. Monuments are a part of our history, not as individual nations, but as a species. By repealing this sanction, are we going to allow nations in times of war, to blatantly desecrate our sacred icons, monuments, and memorials? We enacted this resolution to help us remember our past, and now it seems as though we do not even remember why we enacted this resolution. My friends, the delegates of the World Assembly, ask yourselves, would you like your nations monuments blatantly desecrated?
by Grays Harbor » Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:36 pm
A mean old man wrote:So is there going to be an edited follow-up for this resolution?
Picobella wrote:Why would we repeal a resolution that is there to protect monuments. Monuments are a part of our history, not as individual nations, but as a species. By repealing this sanction, are we going to allow nations in times of war, to blatantly desecrate our sacred icons, monuments, and memorials? We enacted this resolution to help us remember our past, and now it seems as though we do not even remember why we enacted this resolution. My friends, the delegates of the World Assembly, ask yourselves, would you like your nations monuments blatantly desecrated?
by The Altani Federation » Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:55 am
by Gobbannium » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:08 am
by Philimbesi » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:16 am
by Grays Harbor » Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:10 am
Gobbannium wrote:We would like to congratulate the authors on a fine piece of work, and look forward to no longer having to designate the inhabitants of our fully utilised royal palaces as "The Official Squatters."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement