Sedgistan wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:I don't believe it's appropriate to use the name of a religion in the name of a person in an issue.
Tough. It's humorous.Furthermore, the Catholic Church opposes the death penalty.
See above answer. Additionally, it's not like the Catholic church has never put anyone to death.Also, no one ever addressed this concern:
*snip stuff about Norma Roe*
Again - funny. You can't expect to wipe everything that goes against the Catholic church from the issues.
Your concern wasn't addressed because it wasn't viewed as something to be concerned about. I haven't replied to all the suggestions here - though when I next work on a list of fixes, I'll review all the posts. However, the suggestions you've made will not be incorporated - they're neither necessary nor desirable. End.
You are right. It's humorous... to those who show like showing their bias and bigotry toward someone's particular religion and is obviously comfortable misrepresenting them through generalizations to make their own personal cheap shots. I'd be very interested to know if you think it would be funny to use Islamic names for names of characters advocating terrorism and violence, to use Darwinian names for characters who advocate racism, to use Jewish names for bankers or hollywood producers, or how about Nazi names for those who support abortion and fetal cell research. Might there be plenty of people who think those would very funny too? My sincere apologies if I take a condescending tone. I'm sure this is just a fluke oversight and that no real bias or hypocrisy is intended on your part.