Further notes:
- The proposal would consist of two different sections. One for the repeal, and one for the new resolution.
- The text in the repeal section would be bound by the existing standards and rules for repeal proposals.
- The text (category, effect, etc.) of the new section would be bound by the existing standards and rules for new proposals.
- The two sections do not need to be related in any way (including category or strength)
- This would not impact the existing ability to simply repeal a resolution.
I think permits a few new (interesting) use-cases:
- When the WA does not want there to be a time between a resolution being repealed and it being replaced (or risk it not being replaced).
- When there are two groups (one desiring to repeal a resolution and one desiring to pass a resolution) who cannot muster sufficient votes by themselves to pass either resolution independently.
Now, I'm not promising anything (or even that it will be possible). I am very interested in the Pros & Cons though and seeing what the players who use the WA more commonly than I think of this.
Some past discussions: