Advertisement
by Pottslande » Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:26 am
by Zeth Rekia » Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:44 am
by Oterro » Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:48 am
by Trotskylvania » Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:58 am
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by Newmoonrising » Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:00 pm
by Olthar » Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:24 pm
by The United City-States » Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:56 pm
by Vecherd » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:05 pm
by Arkinesia » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:09 pm
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by 1000 Cats » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:09 pm
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Olthar » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:17 pm
1000 Cats wrote:"Like" and "love" are two very different concepts. If you can't tell the difference in the same way you can tell the difference between stumbling over a rock and running head-first into a concrete wall, you just haven't yet experienced love.
by Bottle » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:18 pm
by Gernonai » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:20 pm
by 1000 Cats » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:22 pm
Olthar wrote:1000 Cats wrote:"Like" and "love" are two very different concepts. If you can't tell the difference in the same way you can tell the difference between stumbling over a rock and running head-first into a concrete wall, you just haven't yet experienced love.
"Love" is simply the name given to an undefined series of complex chemical impulses. It is an effectively meaningless term, only given importance by modern culture and society.
Did I get it right?
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Al-Harakut al-Islami » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:24 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:
Can you imagine how awkward that would be?
"Mom, Dad... I'm an owl."
"Wha... what?!"
"I know, I know. I..."
"Can you stop being an owl?"
"Mom, it's not a choice."
"NO SON OF MINE CAN BE AN OWL!"
"Dad! It's not even physically possible! Christ, how can you be racist against something you didn't know existed until 5 seconds ago?!"
"Do you have an owlfriend?"
"Yes Mom. His name is Damien."
by Suidwes-Afrika » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:24 pm
Joneslind wrote:love is not my thing -but i had a girl i loved win i was 12 -but it never is love at that age.
by Olthar » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:25 pm
1000 Cats wrote:Olthar wrote:"Love" is simply the name given to an undefined series of complex chemical impulses. It is an effectively meaningless term, only given importance by modern culture and society.
Did I get it right?
No. It's a very meaningful term and has been given importance by every human culture across all chronology. It's also much more complex than your implied neurochemistry, involving a wide variety of somatic and psychological phenomena. You got the rest right, though.
by Iglesian Archipelago » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:27 pm
by 1000 Cats » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:28 pm
Olthar wrote:1000 Cats wrote:No. It's a very meaningful term and has been given importance by every human culture across all chronology. It's also much more complex than your implied neurochemistry, involving a wide variety of somatic and psychological phenomena. You got the rest right, though.
Really? All human culture? I guess you didn't do so well in history class, eh? "Love" has really only existed since 18th century Europe started the Romanticism movement.
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
by Bottle » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:29 pm
Olthar wrote:1000 Cats wrote:No. It's a very meaningful term and has been given importance by every human culture across all chronology. It's also much more complex than your implied neurochemistry, involving a wide variety of somatic and psychological phenomena. You got the rest right, though.
Really? All human culture? I guess you didn't do so well in history class, eh? "Love" has really only existed since 18th century Europe started the Romanticism movement.
by Southern Patriots » Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:30 pm
Olthar wrote:1000 Cats wrote:No. It's a very meaningful term and has been given importance by every human culture across all chronology. It's also much more complex than your implied neurochemistry, involving a wide variety of somatic and psychological phenomena. You got the rest right, though.
Really? All human culture? I guess you didn't do so well in history class, eh? "Love" has really only existed since 18th century Europe started the Romanticism movement.
Panzerjaeger wrote:Why would Cleopatra have cornrows? She is from Egypt not the goddamn Bronx.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almighty Biden, Elwher, Ethel mermania, Hidrandia, High Earth, Ifreann, Khardsland, New Crywyzyxycynya, Snowtolia, Soviet Haaregrad, The Black Forrest, The Jamesian Republic, Uvolla, Valrifall, Wortel, Zhiyouguo
Advertisement