Good thing he was talking about launches, not landings.
lrn2readingcomprehension
Advertisement
by Senestrum » Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:15 pm
by Seperates » Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:27 pm
by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:30 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Euronion » Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:56 pm
The Sovietyeto wrote:It's impossible. Let's look at the facts...
1. The flag in the video was seen waving... On the MOON!
2. None of the film was damaged by the space radiation. The thin shield the apollo provided wouldn't be enough to protect the astronauts or keep the film 100% intact.
3. If the film is speed up a little bit the astronauts look like thy move normally... That proves it could be faked.
4. The landing the Apollo should have made all the nearby dust fly away, yet somehow Astrong makes a footprint...
5. I Armstrong was the first man on the moon then who was filming him?
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"
by Grenartia » Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:58 pm
by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jun 26, 2011 6:13 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Grenartia » Sun Jun 26, 2011 6:34 pm
by GeneralHaNor » Sun Jun 26, 2011 6:45 pm
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.
by Sociobiology » Sun Jun 26, 2011 6:49 pm
Euronion wrote:The Sovietyeto wrote:It's impossible. Let's look at the facts...
1. The flag in the video was seen waving... On the MOON!
2. None of the film was damaged by the space radiation. The thin shield the apollo provided wouldn't be enough to protect the astronauts or keep the film 100% intact.
3. If the film is speed up a little bit the astronauts look like thy move normally... That proves it could be faked.
4. The landing the Apollo should have made all the nearby dust fly away, yet somehow Astrong makes a footprint...
5. I Armstrong was the first man on the moon then who was filming him?
1. thats because when they pushed it into the moon the flag moved, not to mention the moon does have gravity
2.uh, yah it was, in fact the only film left that is still intact is in Australia, and the footage was live
3.uh, you speed it up, what do you expect
4. maybe because the probe's thrusters blew the top dust away, its like asking if there is dust on something and you blow some of the dust off, why is there dust on your fingers if you wipe the dust, and the dust might have flown away, but lets see, I think a 130 lbs man in a 70 lbs space suit will leave a footprint in the dirt
5. the probe had a camera on it from multiple angles, and there was also a second guy
and if the film was faked, why would the Soviets not have continued to try and go to the moon, if they even had a shadow of a doubt that the Americans didn't make it
by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jun 26, 2011 6:52 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Grenartia » Sun Jun 26, 2011 7:46 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bombadil, Google [Bot], Plan Neonie, Tungstan, Varsemia
Advertisement