Arkinesia wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Are we still trying this routine? Really?
Look, I know you all were bent out of shape that ol' GW said a catastrophically stupid thing on a nearly daily basis and we made calenders out of his flubs, etc. and you were sitting there with your tivos all ready for the slightest slip up from the new guy so you could go, "Oh, but you made so much of Bush's slips..." But honestly, is it too much to ask that you actually come up with your own material instead of just trying to shoehorn 'Bushisms' onto the new guy?
You're inferring a lot of things that were not mentioned and are not true.
Now would you like to stop flailing your arms about or would you like me to explain why this is such bad press?
Honestly, I don't give a shit. Tempest in teapots would consider this much ado about nothing.