"MY WAY IS THE OMG! BEST WAY SO IT SHOULD BE MANDATORY FOR EVERYBODY
Especially when your way is a juvenile and bastardized version of the original.
Anyway [/editorial] illegal Ideological ban.
Advertisement
by Philimbesi » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:41 am
"MY WAY IS THE OMG! BEST WAY SO IT SHOULD BE MANDATORY FOR EVERYBODY
by Grays Harbor » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:45 am
Philimbesi wrote:"MY WAY IS THE OMG! BEST WAY SO IT SHOULD BE MANDATORY FOR EVERYBODY
Especially when your way is a juvenile and bastardized version of the original.
Anyway [/editorial] illegal Ideological ban.
by Philimbesi » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:48 am
Grays Harbor wrote:Philimbesi wrote:"MY WAY IS THE OMG! BEST WAY SO IT SHOULD BE MANDATORY FOR EVERYBODY
Especially when your way is a juvenile and bastardized version of the original.
Anyway [/editorial] illegal Ideological ban.
I was going more for "irony". apparently the arrow not only missed the mark but the entire target.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:14 am
Election Observers Act
Category: Furtherment of Democracy
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Guy0307
Description: THE WORLD ASSEMBLY
RECOGNISES the importance of democracy, which farthers people's rights
NOTES that democracy is occasionally flawed, and not all candidates are given an equal opprotunity
FURTHER NOTES that international observers can minimise such influences on elections
IT IS RESOLVED THAT:
(1) No country shall refuse observers for its elections
(2) A candidate found illegaly influencing the outcome of elections shall not be elected, with all votes for that candidate held invalid
(3) If party leaders, as defined by that country's statue, are found influencing the outcome of an election votes for any candidate of such party shall be held invalid
(4) If a candidate, penalised by sections (2) or (3) of this acts, wins an election, there shall be a repeat election, excluding that candidate
by Grays Harbor » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:24 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:56 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:We agree with Charlotte Ryberg. Not only does it mandate a specific type of government for all, but that all WA nations be inundated by more bureaucrats poking their collective noses in without any say by the nation in the matter. "One size fits all" proposals are getting a bit tedious in their naive stridency.
This is just our opinion, but we believe this proposal would be best relegated to that fine oversight committee,
International
Gathering of
Nations
Organized for
Relief from
Extremism
Kinda a copy from the UN Charter of Human Rights or simply the one that conflicts with the Charter of Civil Rights and Freedom of Expression.The Universal Bill of Rights
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Kopania
Description: CONCERNED: That the World Assembly does not have a Bill of Rights but only a handful of laws not completely covering basic human rights.
Recalling the many egregious infringements of human rights,
RECOGNIZING: The need to protect basic human rights,
CONDEMNING: Any acts by government at the sake of human rights,
DETERMINED: To put an end to the violation of human rights,
The World Assembly shall endorse what will be called the Universal Bill of Rights, the articles of which are as follows:
Article 1 -- All human beings have the right to choose worship any faith or no faith, and to change their religious beliefs at any time without punishment on the part of the state.
Article 2 -- All human beings have the right to express their right of free speech as long as it is truthful and deemed safe for society, this goes along with books, magazines, newspaper and other media. What is deemed safe for society shall be determined by the World Assembly Council on Human Rights.Unsafe for society includes, racist remarks, violent remarks, False statements.
Article 3 -- All human beings have the right to peacefully assemble.
Article 4 -- All men and women are created equal and are to be treated equal no matter what race.
Article 5 -- All human beings must not be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman, or unusual treatment or punishment.
Article 6 -- No human beings will be subjected to arrest or exile without an explicit list of their offenses.
Article 7 -- Any arrested person must be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Article 8 -- A human beings family members cannot be held accountable for the crimes of their relative unless they somehow link with the crime.
Article 9 -- Any human life is to be treated with care no matter how small or large they are. No human can be put to death without criminal charges.
Article 10 -- Any persons who violate any of these articles shall be held accountable by the law.
Article 11 -- The Universal Bill of Rights does not override the existing Bill of Rights of World Assembly members. If any of these stated rights do not exist in a member nation, they are herby protected. If any nation has rights that go beyond these universal rights, the Universal Bill of Rights will not remove those rights.
Establishing: The World Assembly Council on Human Rights(WACHR)which will oversee these rights and oversee all other human rights laws under the WA be treated and obeyed and enforced as "LAWS".
by Flibbleites » Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:07 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Destroy Capitalism
A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.
Category: Social Justice
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: The Animal Union
Description: APPALLED at the fact that under capitalism, poverty rates are unheard of;
ACKNOWLEDGING that although most employers want better quality workers, all must be employed to keep the economy going; and
ARGUING that under socialism, poverty rates will go from their current rates to 0%.
Thus, the proposal states:
1. All WA nations shall end their current government form and adhere to socialism;
2. All WA nations shall set a rate of money for people to make yearly (i.e., 40000 units) and delegates shall enforce such in the region of residency;
3. All WA nations will pass laws stating that thou who shall not work shall be jailed; and
4. Nothing in this proposal shall be ignored once in effect.
Approvals: 0
Status: Lacking Support (requires 52 more approvals)
advocating that all nations adhere to the proposers own favoured "sacred cow" form of government ...... hnh ..... can this proposal die a quick and ignored death please? We really don't need yet another "MY WAY IS THE OMG! BEST WAY SO IT SHOULD BE MANDATORY FOR EVERYBODY" proposal.
So write a resolution that bans their use, you don't have to repeal the NAPA to do that.Repeal "Nuclear Arms Possession Act"
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #10
Proposed by: FlagGuy0307
Description: WA Resolution #10: Nuclear Arms Possession Act (Category: International Security; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Argument: The resolution does nothing to stop WA nations from using nuclear weapons to destroy other nations.
Further, nuclear weapons are not required to defend one country, they can only bring upon the destruction of others.
Illegal, plagiarization and an apparent amendment attempt.New NuclearArms Possesion Act
A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.
Category: International Security
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: FlagTheNetherworld
Description: The original Nuclear Arms Possession act states "REALIZING that WA members are outnumbered by non members by about 3 to 1,
ACKNOWLEDGING the fact that only WA members are required to comply with WA resolutions,
NOTICING the fact that many non member nations are hostile towards WA members,
REALIZING that the WA members need to be able to defend themselves if attacked,
1. DECLARES that WA members are allowed to possess nuclear weapons to defend themselves from hostile nations,
2. PRESERVES the right for individual nations to decide if they want to possess nuclear weapons,
3. REQUIRES that any nation choosing to possess nuclear weapons take every available precaution to ensure that their weapons do not fall into the wrong hands."
I propose to make the world safer from World Assembly members who disobey the Nuclear Arms Possession act, and launch nuclear devices for no reason.
1. A Nation requires the WA's consent to launch a Nuclear Device.
2. If a Launches a Nuclear device without consent, the Nation must give a reason, to why so urgently they need to launch the device.
3. Should a Nation Launch a nuclear device without consent, and without an urgent reason, that nation will be forced to relinquish all nuclear devices, and all trade of radioactive material to that nation will be prohibited.
by Grays Harbor » Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:17 pm
1. A Nation requires the WA's consent to launch a Nuclear Device.
by Flibbleites » Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:21 pm
Strangely enough, my biggest problem with it is the plagiarzation, now if I could only figure out why that is.Grays Harbor wrote:I believe my biggest problem with the last one listed is this:1. A Nation requires the WA's consent to launch a Nuclear Device.
Grays Harbor wrote:If somebody attacks my nation with nuclear or biological weapons, I am not going to sit around and wait while the WA opens an endless debate on whether I am justified in retaliation while my nations citizens die.
This proposal also deserves to be forwarded to
International
Gathering of
Nations
Organized for
Relief from
Extremism
by Serbian_Soviet_Union » Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:28 pm
Disarm Nukes Act
A resolution to slash worldwide military spending.
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Guy0307
Description: NATIONS OF THE WORLD ASSEMBLY SHALL
(1) Dismantle all nuclear weapons in possession
(2) Use resources that are being used for nuclear weapons programs to further a country's welfare, and not its military
(3) Try and eliminate all wars, and refrain from any possibility of a conflict by not provoking other countries
(4) Never engage in an act of terrorism, where civilians are targeted instead of military targets, unless another nation has engaged in such activites beforehand
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:50 am
The social experiment
Category: Social Justice
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Ouynac tuotierugiftnac
Description: People of the world; let us unite to create a system which will dramatically increase the quality of life of the people because that is the real responsibility of the government. To feed and shelter the worker is to have clothes and products for yourself. To give the farmer a well deserved compensation for his/her efforts is to have food on your table. By agreeing to this, society would be agreeing to life, liberty, justice and equality. The people trust in you all. I beseech you to not let them down. We are asking for:
1. A reduction in the amount of expenditure in the military. For war will bring ruin to all.
2. An increase in social welfare spending. For your people need to weather out economic downturns.
3. A system of small-scale privatization that will significantly reduce the power of corporations in favor of small farmers. For it is through these men and women that we live.
4. An enforcement of civil rights for union members. For oppression against the people who make our clothes, our riches and our daily appliances will stagnate human progress.
5. A combined effort to ensure that every person gets their fair share of wealth in land, money and so on. In that respect, let there be
i) absolutely no self-imposed bonuses by corporate leaders.
ii) a manageable system that does reward good work, but prevents excessive, and undeserved, wealth.
iii) a system of land reform that gives
small farmers their rightful share of land.
For it is through these steps that we can ensure great progress towards the rise of the poor into a much more comfortable state.
6. Allow trusted militias to protect the land. This will reduce military expenditure while also giving the people power. To prevent abuses, they must all be part of a council of comradeship that meets and discusses regional problems. For it is us, the people who protect ourselves.
7. The disintegration of mercenary and security firms. The protection of the people should not be vested in the hands of filthy pigs. For it is the merchants of death who keep the gears of war spinning.
8. A significantly powerful regulation of enterprises to prevent volatile economic , environmental and social conditions. For it is the job of the parents to prevent the children from going wild.
9. An end to nuclear armament, for the greatness that is humanity should not fall to its own convoluted conception.
Leaders of the world, I beseech you once more to allow this act to pass. Help yourself and your people.
Not again...by Grays Harbor » Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:39 am
by The Babbage Islands » Sat Jun 06, 2009 10:10 am
Ban on religion
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: FlagCold Archivia
Description: RECOGNISING that religion is opium for and by the people
FURTHER RECOGNISING that it has never done any good for society
APPALED at the atrocities carried out in it's name
SUGGESTED to ban religion alltogether, since nothing good comes of it.
Approvals: 0
Status: Lacking Support (requires 52 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Tue Jun 9 2009
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Jun 06, 2009 10:30 am
The Babbage Islands wrote:Ban on religion
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: FlagCold Archivia
Description: RECOGNISING that religion is opium for and by the people
FURTHER RECOGNISING that it has never done any good for society
APPALED at the atrocities carried out in it's name
SUGGESTED to ban religion alltogether, since nothing good comes of it.
Approvals: 0
Status: Lacking Support (requires 52 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Tue Jun 9 2009
Rarely is this put more blatantly.
by Allrule » Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:41 pm
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Guns why???
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Billy bob joey
Description: Why do we have guns??? Well frankly if they fall into the wrong hands who knows what can happen.
these are a few reasons on why we need to tighten gun laws,
1) Crimes are sometimes have guns involved. Criiminals use guns
2) Guns are dangerous and every day kids and adults are playing around with them and are accidently shooting themselves.
3) People do not need to walk around with them because some kids can get the crap scared out of them and its not appealing to parrents.
These are a few reasons we need to tighten gun laws. Please pay attention and read this. Thanks!
More of an ad rather than a proposal. Also does nothing.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Sat Jun 06, 2009 5:21 pm
(A few WA n00bs seem to be conservatives, I see.)
by Allrule » Sat Jun 06, 2009 5:28 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:(A few WA n00bs seem to be conservatives, I see.)
Why would a conservative want to tighten gun control laws?
by Serbian_Soviet_Union » Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:09 pm
Rights of the Uranium Miner
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.
Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: Uranium Mining
Proposed by: The Wilsons
Description: ASTOUNDED that the Uranium Mining industry does not supply life insurance to their workers.
THIS resolution forces every Uranium Mining Corporation to insure their miners against accidents resulting in injury that requires surgery, medicine, or therapy, and death.
REASONS for this resolution:
1. Wives of deceased or permanently ijured miners who are unemployed and are accustomed to a one-income family are beiing driven into poverty, while the corporation hires another worker, and leaves the ex-employee at the market's mercy.
2. Due to outsourcing, it has become possible and favorable to fire injured miners, and hire immigrants or personnel in other countries, depleting the economy of the home country.
3. Dead miners' families are left to rot in unemployment and poverty.
WE must stop the exploitation of the workers by multinational corporations.
by Grays Harbor » Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:20 am
Serbian_Soviet_Union wrote: This resolution does nothing and does not explain on how to control or stop multinational corporations to exploitate the workers and does not specify nothing on how these uranium minners will be protected by this.
by Grays Harbor » Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:27 am
Unemployment
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Anopopei
Description: Article I: Stating That All Members Of The W.A Must Provide Some Sort Of National Unemployment Plan.
Article II: That While Unemployed, If The Reciever Is Homeless, They Will Recieve Free Medicine (Free Admission To Hospitals, Doctors and Dentists) And Free Housing Provided By The State.
Article III: That The Reciever of The Payment Will Only Be Allowed Full Benefits For A Peroid of 9 Months. After, They Will Recieve Half Of The Original Payment and Only Free Admission To Hospitals. Free Housing Will Still Be Provided.
Article IV:After A Period Of 14 Months, The State's Unemployment Sector Will Find A Job Suited For The Worker.
1:PAYMENT PLANS
Article I: For The 9 Months of Full Benefits, The Unemployed Will Recieve A Monthly Check Of:$1000
Article II: From 9 Months And 1 Day Until 14 Months, They Will Recieve A Monthly Check Of $500.
Article III: Once The Recently Unemployed Is Now Employed By The State, They Will Have To Wait A Period Of 9 Months Before Being Able To Recieve Full Benefits Once Again.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Jun 07, 2009 7:47 am
High Fund Teachers
Category: Education and Creativity
Area of Effect: Educational
Proposed by: Hatesmanville
Description: RECOGNIZING the fact that some teachers are really bad, mean and have a tendency to make kids feel bad. All kids have the right to learn, their teachers shouldn't corrupt that.
IF this proposal goes ahead, all teachers will undergo annual reviews (on intelligence and kindness) and must meet a certain quota.
by Cold Archivia » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:29 am
by Grays Harbor » Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:20 am
by Flibbleites » Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:57 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Unemployment
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Anopopei
Description: Article I: Stating That All Members Of The W.A Must Provide Some Sort Of National Unemployment Plan.
Article II: That While Unemployed, If The Reciever Is Homeless, They Will Recieve Free Medicine (Free Admission To Hospitals, Doctors and Dentists) And Free Housing Provided By The State.
Article III: That The Reciever of The Payment Will Only Be Allowed Full Benefits For A Peroid of 9 Months. After, They Will Recieve Half Of The Original Payment and Only Free Admission To Hospitals. Free Housing Will Still Be Provided.
Article IV:After A Period Of 14 Months, The State's Unemployment Sector Will Find A Job Suited For The Worker.
1:PAYMENT PLANS
Article I: For The 9 Months of Full Benefits, The Unemployed Will Recieve A Monthly Check Of:$1000
Article II: From 9 Months And 1 Day Until 14 Months, They Will Recieve A Monthly Check Of $500.
Article III: Once The Recently Unemployed Is Now Employed By The State, They Will Have To Wait A Period Of 9 Months Before Being Able To Recieve Full Benefits Once Again.
oh hooray. yet another one size fits all proposal mandating how everybody will do something, in this case exactly how much and when we give unemployed persons. And it is in a currency my nation does not use.
This is another job for......
International
Gathering of
Nations
Organized for
Relief from
Extremism
by Grays Harbor » Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:47 pm
Users browsing this forum: 0cala