NATION

PASSWORD

SUBMITTED: Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Telemia
Envoy
 
Posts: 262
Founded: Jun 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: SUBMITTED: Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"

Postby Telemia » Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:02 pm

Pungote wrote:Lets go OOC here for a second

If a legal act was committed in the real world and then it was made illegal, would it be okay for that prolonged now illegal act to be commited? no, sanctions would be introduced and illegal condemnations would be revoked.

Back in character...
So uh... is this proposal ever gonna be pulled out of the submitted queue and edited?
Doesn't look like it

oh well! *shines condemnation badge*
ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY PINGU!

A new proposal will be made. Its too soon to keep thrusting repeals into the Assembly, there's only so many times a nation cares to help out before it becomes immiterial. There will be a new proposal, that much is a promise. Hopefully, when it is put into vote, it will pass, and become a resolution. Then further, hopefully it will be passed and NAZI EUROPE can continue to live its life as an independent region, governing the way its allowed to govern without being judged by the ignorant.
Kanzler Johan Ulrick
Proud member of NAZI EUROPE
Geheime Staatspolizei Führer

Member of the Fascists/National Socialists/Nazis Alliance


Those Nazis are scary. You just don't set up a region like that for fun.
- The Nuke Builders of Look at me on NAZI EUROPE
French Standerd Issue equipment: Regular Civilians Clothes, butter knife, BB gun, white flag... The Great French Military
- Laos on (insignificant) France

User avatar
Elke and Elba
Minister
 
Posts: 2757
Founded: Aug 24, 2009
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re: SUBMITTED: Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"

Postby Elke and Elba » Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:12 pm

Rules say so that nations based on any ideology CANNOT be banned - see most glorious hack posts. So just submit it up. You beat me to it :)
Represented permanently at the World Assembly by Benjamin Olafsen, and on an ad-hoc basis by Alethea Norrland and rarely Gaia Pao and Gabriel Dzichpol.
OOCly retired from the GA/SC for something called 'real life'.
Author of GA#288 and SC#148.
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.

User avatar
Travancore-Cochin
Envoy
 
Posts: 335
Founded: Jun 25, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: SUBMITTED: Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"

Postby Travancore-Cochin » Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:31 am

Again?

Why don't you give it some more time before submitting?

User avatar
Inflatable Gandalfs
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 133
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Inflatable Gandalfs » Sat Aug 29, 2009 7:01 am

Elke and Elba wrote:Rules say so that nations based on any ideology CANNOT be banned - see most glorious hack posts.

Those do not apply to the Security Council. We have no rules here. Ta.
I rest my case. Nurse! My medication!

User avatar
Glen-Rhodes
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9010
Founded: Jun 25, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re:

Postby Glen-Rhodes » Sat Aug 29, 2009 7:15 am

Inflatable Gandalfs wrote:Those do not apply to the Security Council. We have no rules here. Ta.

The SC had that rule for a whole three days. :( I think it's going to be a little entertaining watching the rules be in a perpetual state of flux, confusing everybody as to what they can and cannot do this day, and what they can and cannot do the next day. One SC resolutions creates this rule, a repeal repeals that rule, if it fails the rule is "in abeyance", so on and so forth.

User avatar
Telemia
Envoy
 
Posts: 262
Founded: Jun 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: SUBMITTED: Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"

Postby Telemia » Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:08 pm

Travancore-Cochin wrote:Again?

Why don't you give it some more time before submitting?

As far as NAZI EUROPE is concerned, we will hold off our request to repeal the condemnation, but in good time, we'll submit another.

Any nation that offers one up will be supported by vote, but we request that no attempt be made so soon, or without acknowledgement of NAZI EUROPE Delegation and Senior Regional Leadership.
Kanzler Johan Ulrick
Proud member of NAZI EUROPE
Geheime Staatspolizei Führer

Member of the Fascists/National Socialists/Nazis Alliance


Those Nazis are scary. You just don't set up a region like that for fun.
- The Nuke Builders of Look at me on NAZI EUROPE
French Standerd Issue equipment: Regular Civilians Clothes, butter knife, BB gun, white flag... The Great French Military
- Laos on (insignificant) France

User avatar
Inflatable Gandalfs
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 133
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: SUBMITTED: Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"

Postby Inflatable Gandalfs » Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:39 pm

We repeal anything at any point we please; we don't take orders from you.

At any rate, the OP has resigned from the World Assembly, has been ordered by the mods to stop posting here, and in all likelihood has abandoned this draft as well, so it might be best to leave his thread be.
I rest my case. Nurse! My medication!

User avatar
Ardchoille
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 9842
Founded: Apr 18, 2004
Democratic Socialists

Re: Re:

Postby Ardchoille » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:51 am

Glen-Rhodes wrote:
Inflatable Gandalfs wrote:Those do not apply to the Security Council. We have no rules here. Ta.

The SC had that rule for a whole three days. <snip>


You misunderstood. A C&C can't ban an ideology because all it can do is commend or condemn, so the GA rule on "no ideological bans" simply doesn't apply.

There was a rule that you could not condemn or commend a nation on ideology alone, but that has been contradicted by WA direct vote and by the failure of a repeal based on that argument.

Re the OP: I did make the exception that the Kenny-copy-named nation could continue with this repeal ONLY in that confusing name, as it had already been submitted. However, as it's now fallen out of the queue, iLock.
Last edited by Ardchoille on Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ideological Bulwark #35
The more scandalous charges were suppressed; the vicar of Christ was accused only of piracy, rape, sodomy, murder and incest. -- Edward Gibbon on the schismatic Pope John XXIII (1410–1415).

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Prasydualis

Advertisement

Remove ads