World Assembly Card Gallery

by **Unibot II** » Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:44 pm

NSUN Cards were made back in the day to humorously identify the exercise of a trope by another poster, I've been recently making my own set of WA Cards for usage in specifically the Security Council, but also in the General Assembly. Feel free to use the cards in threads where they wouldn't be pic spamming. If you want to suggest a new addition, I'll be happy to take suggestions. As NSwiki notes, "[NSUN Cards] were first created by Edward Jones, the Minister of UN Affairs of Texan Hotrodders; soon new series arrived, graphical cards introduced by Moltan Bausch, the UN Ambassador from Gruenberg and colored pictured ones, initiated by His Excellency Sir Cyril MacLehose-Strangways-Jones, Delegate to the United Nations for The Governorate of Cobdenia". So, I suppose you could say these are the Eduard Heir edition.

Volume One

by **Unibot II** » Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:44 pm

Volume Two

by **Unibot II** » Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:45 pm

--Saved for expansion--

by **Unibot II** » Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:45 pm

--Saved for expansion--

by **Unibot II** » Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:50 pm

My thinking is we need more cards describing common illegalities, so that would include trying to do more than what the SC can do, lacking an operative clause, and commending/condemning a mod. Oh, and self-commendations and self-condemnations should have a card too. Oh and more cards regarding liberations.

by **Mousebumples** » Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:02 pm

How about a "Resigning? Dibs on your office!" card?

by **Unibot II** » Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:16 pm

Mousebumples wrote:How about a "Resigning? Dibs on your office!" card?

Hehehe... Will do.

by **Todd McCloud** » Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:22 pm

Hahaha, looks pretty cool so far

by **Unibot II** » Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:44 pm

Mousebumples wrote:How about a "Resigning? Dibs on your office!" card?

Added!

by **Rawrgirnia** » Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:52 pm

"Shut up about abortion" would be nice.

Also, maybe something for those lovely proposals that do nothing except create a committee.

by **Mousebumples** » Sat Feb 05, 2011 11:34 pm

Rawrgirnia wrote:Also, maybe something for those lovely proposals that do nothing except create a committee.

I suggest this one from the old UN cards:

Not that Unibot can't create a new card with the same message, but since once already exists, I don't know that we need another one ...

by **Unibot II** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 1:07 am

Mousebumples wrote:
Rawrgirnia wrote:Also, maybe something for those lovely proposals that do nothing except create a committee.

I suggest this one from the old UN cards:

Not that Unibot can't create a new card with the same message, but since once already exists, I don't know that we need another one ...

Well, I've noticed a new plague to the WA...

Committeephobia
n. An irrational fear of the usage of committees in resolutions.

by **Unibot II** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 1:23 am

Rawrgirnia wrote:"Shut up about abortion" would be nice.

I've added my own version of that.

by **Rawrgirnia** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 9:42 am

Unibot II wrote:
Rawrgirnia wrote:"Shut up about abortion" would be nice.

I've added my own version of that.

Love it!

by **Glen-Rhodes** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 11:54 am

The best part about these are that they're unabashedly offensive.

by **Unibot II** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 12:20 pm

Glen-Rhodes wrote:The best part about these are that they're unabashedly offensive.

They're the Eduard Heir series, Unabashedly-Offensive is practically his second middle name.

by **Unibot II** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 1:15 pm

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:
Jesoland wrote:Our primary argument is that this resolution is misleading and probably written in bad faith (id est, it was intentionally misleading in order to be approved): and the proof that it's misleading is the ambiguity about so-called "donations".

The confusing point is that a donation, to be true, must be two properties donations in GA#17 don't have:

1. The donor must be driven by animus donandi, id est he mustn't be required to do so
2. The donee can be required a service in return, but it mustn't exhaust the value of the donation. Requiring that any surplus is returned to member nations, it follows that WA doesn't enrich. And donee's enrichment is the second necessary condition for defining a donation.

So, those prescribed by GA#17 are donations neither de facto nor de jure.

You've brought a whole new meaning to the term "Dictionary Wars"!

^^ This has inspired the newest entry.

by **Grays Harbor** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 3:24 pm

how about one for duplication?

by **A mean old man** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 4:57 pm

Where are the "micromanagement" and "national sovereignty" cards?

by **Kryozerkia** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 5:06 pm

I quite like this collection; I shall have to consider using one or two in future.

by **Glen-Rhodes** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 6:05 pm

A mean old man wrote:Where are the "micromanagement" and "national sovereignty" cards?

I demand an IntFed card! :evil:

by **Unibot II** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 6:18 pm

Grays Harbor wrote:how about one for duplication?

by **Omigodtheykilledkenny** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 6:40 pm

Unibot II wrote:(Image)

Nice.

by **Daynor** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:05 pm

Bloody stupid could be funny. As well as fenda/raider bias.

by **Unibot II** » Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:57 pm

A mean old man wrote:Where are the "micromanagement" and "national sovereignty" cards?

Glen-Rhodes wrote:
A mean old man wrote:Where are the "micromanagement" and "national sovereignty" cards?

I demand an IntFed card!

Done, Done and Done!

Kryozerkia wrote:I quite like this collection; I shall have to consider using one or two in future.

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:
Unibot II wrote:(Image)

Nice.

Thank you!

World Assembly Card Gallery

World Assembly Card Gallery

Who is online