No nation with humans in it can ignore this resolution. Just because a nation happens not to have human inhabitants doesn't mean that is a way out of it, anymore than it would be if the terms in the proposal had simply referred to 'humans'. It'd be like arguing a resolution about desertification was 'optional' because not all nations have deserts.Hack wrote:The opinionality ban refers to when language such as "Nations can ignore this Resolution if they want," which is right out.
Unless this is a new ruling that a resolution specifically cannot reference humans, which is (a) quite a departure and (b) fucking ridiculous.