-Challenged proposal: link.
-Rules violated: Honest Mistake, Game Mechanics
I believe that it is an honest mistake for the repeal to claim that,
the resolution does not prohibit member states from restricting the dissemination of reporting by journalists or news organizations for reasons that are not permitted by extant World Assembly legislation,
as the target explicitly
Orders that journalists or news organizations not be subject to civil or criminal penalties for the content they produce by member state governments beyond [restrictions "permitted by extant World Assembly legislation"]
If a member nation is to "restrict the dissemination of reporting by journalists or news organisations", that would require somehow enforcing penalties upon said "journalists or news organisations"; which is explicitly prohibited by the target. A restriction with no penalties attached is not a restriction; a member nation cannot reasonably claim that they have imposed a restriction on drunk driving such that drunk driving is prohibited, if anyone can engage in drunk driving without them or anyone else being penalised for the same.
The proposal also declares, "Hereby repeals the “Press Freedom Act”"; notably, Press Freedom Act not being the name of the target. Is this a Game Mechanics violation, as a repeal can repeal the target for which it was submitted only, rather than a non-existent "Press Freedom Act"? Alternatively, can "Press Freedom Act" be dismissed as an alias for the resolution Protecting Press Freedoms, so the proposal would not be illegal for Game Mechanics?
I thank the Secretariat for their time.