Advertisement
by Oblivious Ben » Sat Jan 07, 2023 6:42 pm
The Sapientia, c.2014 wrote:""You'll be back. Once you start, you can never stop.""
LWU gtrf0129 c. 2022 wrote:This raid was so powerful that the power went out in my house lol
by Cretanja » Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:44 am
by BendyBen » Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:16 am
by Witchcraft and Sorcery » Mon Jan 09, 2023 7:38 pm
2 hours ago: Sheik al Jabal agreed to construct embassies between Dar al Islam and The Brotherhood of Malice.
2 hours ago: Valtarre proposed constructing embassies between The Brotherhood of Malice and Dar al Islam.
by RiderSyl » Mon Jan 09, 2023 7:57 pm
Witchcraft and Sorcery wrote:2 hours ago: Sheik al Jabal agreed to construct embassies between Dar al Islam and The Brotherhood of Malice.
2 hours ago: Valtarre proposed constructing embassies between The Brotherhood of Malice and Dar al Islam.
keeping it very classy, I see
by Gorundu » Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:45 pm
by New Astri » Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:50 pm
Gorundu wrote:RiderSyl wrote:I'm very interested in what your problem is with that.
I don't know...maybe the founder saying "Israel does not have a right to exist" might give one some pause before establishing embassies?
by Second Sovereignty » Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:53 pm
Gorundu wrote:I don't know...maybe the founder saying "Israel does not have a right to exist" might give one some pause before establishing embassies?
by Zeorus » Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:54 pm
Witchcraft and Sorcery wrote:2 hours ago: Sheik al Jabal agreed to construct embassies between Dar al Islam and The Brotherhood of Malice.
2 hours ago: Valtarre proposed constructing embassies between The Brotherhood of Malice and Dar al Islam.
keeping it very classy, I see
by Zeorus » Mon Jan 09, 2023 8:57 pm
Gorundu wrote:RiderSyl wrote:I'm very interested in what your problem is with that.
I don't know...maybe the founder saying "Israel does not have a right to exist" might give one some pause before establishing embassies?
by Astrobolt » Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:13 pm
by Second Sovereignty » Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:15 pm
Astrobolt wrote:What a load of absolute utter rubbish. Let’s be clear, you can heavily criticize Israel’s policies, but selectively saying that the Israeli state has no right to exist crosses a line. Its horrifying to see this comment praised rather than condemned.
by Gorundu » Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:19 pm
Zeorus wrote:Gorundu wrote:I don't know...maybe the founder saying "Israel does not have a right to exist" might give one some pause before establishing embassies?
This is irrelevant to NS politics as Israel is an IRL country, but being BoM's Yiddish anarchist in residence I'll bite: Israel doesn't have a right to exist. No state does. Have a good one!
by Zeorus » Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:21 pm
Astrobolt wrote:What a load of absolute utter rubbish. Let’s be clear, you can heavily criticize Israel’s policies, but selectively saying that the Israeli state has no right to exist crosses a line. Its horrifying to see this comment praised rather than condemned.
by Zeorus » Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:22 pm
Gorundu wrote:Zeorus wrote:
This is irrelevant to NS politics as Israel is an IRL country, but being BoM's Yiddish anarchist in residence I'll bite: Israel doesn't have a right to exist. No state does. Have a good one!
I don't want to hijack this thread and turn this into NSG, but claiming what I raised was irrelevant because Israel is an IRL country is just utter rubbish. Nazi Germany was an IRL country, I guess we should turn a blind eye too to anyone praising Nazi Germany?
(Before anyone takes what I said out of context, I'm not drawing any equivalencies between anything here. Just pointing out the ridiculousness of "this is irrelevant because it's IRL")
by RiderSyl » Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:28 pm
Gorundu wrote:Zeorus wrote:
This is irrelevant to NS politics as Israel is an IRL country, but being BoM's Yiddish anarchist in residence I'll bite: Israel doesn't have a right to exist. No state does. Have a good one!
I don't want to hijack this thread and turn this into NSG, but claiming what I raised was irrelevant because Israel is an IRL country is just utter rubbish. Nazi Germany was an IRL country, I guess we should turn a blind eye too to anyone praising Nazi Germany?
(Before anyone takes what I said out of context, I'm not drawing any equivalencies between anything here. Just pointing out the ridiculousness of "this is irrelevant because it's IRL")
by Gorundu » Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:40 pm
RiderSyl wrote:This is actually a direct comparison to fascists and yet somehow I get the feeling the same people that got on my ass last year will respect your disclaimer.
Zeorus wrote:This is a hell of a Godwin. Props.
by RiderSyl » Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:49 pm
Gorundu wrote:RiderSyl wrote:This is actually a direct comparison to fascists and yet somehow I get the feeling the same people that got on my ass last year will respect your disclaimer.Zeorus wrote:This is a hell of a Godwin. Props.
I mean, there's a couple people here calling Israel a genocidal state, but yeah, go off on me for invoking fascism.
by Zeorus » Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:55 pm
Gorundu wrote:RiderSyl wrote:This is actually a direct comparison to fascists and yet somehow I get the feeling the same people that got on my ass last year will respect your disclaimer.Zeorus wrote:This is a hell of a Godwin. Props.
I mean, there's a couple people here calling Israel a genocidal state, but yeah, go off on me for invoking fascism.
by Reventus Koth » Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:11 pm
Xanthal wrote:Only raiders can win in this war- a defender can keep them from winning one region, one update at a time, but there will always be the next region, the next update, and the next, forever.
by Shirahime » Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:25 pm
RiderSyl wrote:I'm very interested in what your problem is with that.
by RiderSyl » Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:34 pm
Shirahime wrote:RiderSyl wrote:I'm very interested in what your problem is with that.
Hi! Makasta here, whille I don't care about them being raiders at all, but here's my reasoning in short.
1. The natives of the old region I felt made it clear that they would rather not be in GP anymore (at least that's how I understood this post by Shayk viewtopic.php?p=40242649&sid=f96264d35df8fb17bc2df485d2a45998#p40242649 )
2. The WFE for the old region has a line that really rubs me the wrong way (here's my source BTW https://greywardens.xyz/tools/wfe_index ... mic_states its the last line)
"| Kharijism, Islamophobia, fascism, and liberalism are strictly prohibited | " emphasis mine
I know little of the first term used so I will refrain from making any comment there but comparing liberalism to fascism in particular rubs me the wrong way. The two ideologies are radically different even if you think both are bad one simply cannot deny that one is worse and one is just liberalism.
I know I'm not WS so sorry about that, just felt I could give a little bit of insight onto the mindset at play here.
by Reventus Koth » Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:35 pm
Shirahime wrote:"| Kharijism, Islamophobia, fascism, and liberalism are strictly prohibited | " emphasis mine
I know little of the first term used so I will refrain from making any comment there but comparing liberalism to fascism in particular rubs me the wrong way. The two ideologies are radically different even if you think both are bad one simply cannot deny that one is worse and one is just liberalism.
Xanthal wrote:Only raiders can win in this war- a defender can keep them from winning one region, one update at a time, but there will always be the next region, the next update, and the next, forever.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement