NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Banning Child Pornography

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Jedinsto
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1196
Founded: Nov 12, 2020
Ex-Nation

[DRAFT] Banning Child Pornography

Postby Jedinsto » Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:18 am

Simone Republic and I are currently drafting a repeal for GA#300, and I was asked to post this replacement draft first, so I will do so.

The World Assembly,

Applauding previous efforts to protect the rights of children through resolutions including but not limited to GA#4, GA#222, and GA#297,

Recalling the recent repeal of GA#300, which placed a ban, however slightly flawed, on child pornography,

Believing in the moral necessity to protect children from potential exploitation,

1. Hereby defines for the purposes of this resolution:

  1. "Child" as a person under the age of majority (or age of consent, whichever is higher) in a member state, and, in any judicial process involving definitions of a "child" involving more than one member state, the definition shall use the highest age of majority among member states relevant to such judicial processes;
  2. "Child pornography" as any visual depictions that is a pornographic depiction of a person who is or is being depicted as a child, regardless of if it is made by electronic or any other means, and regardless of whether it depicts a real person;
  3. "Pornographic depiction" is in turn defined as any depiction of sexual activities and any exposure of body parts customarily deemed by a member nation to be pornographic; any depiction of one or more children engaging in sexual activity, posing in a suggestive or sexual manner, or any kind of nude depiction of one or more children.

2. Hereby prohibits, as a felony offense, the import, export, creation, possession, use and distribution of child pornography within and between any member state(s);
  1. Should the offense be limited to simple possession and committed by a person who is a child themselves, the offense need not necessarily be elevated to a felony;

3. Hereby further requires that in prosecutions for the aforesaid offence in judicial proceedings, it is a defense for the defendant to establish at least one of the following:

  1. The depiction is required for a genuine educational, scientific or medical purpose and distributed only strictly to person(s) that require such depictions and no others;
  2. The possession of such items of child pornography was not requested, and the defendant had both (a) reported and turned over such items to the law enforcement authority of a member state as soon as practicable and (b) endeavored to destroy such items as soon as practicable after the said reporting;
  3. The possession of such items of child pornography was kept to be used strictly for the purposes of being used as evidence in judicial proceedings, was indeed not used for any other purpose, and only those relevant to the specific judicial proceeding have access to the child pornography, and only when absolutely necessary for the judicial proceeding;
  4. The depiction was believed on reasonable grounds to not be that of a child when originally depicted and that the person was not depicted as a child.
  5. The depiction is not of a real child, was not made for or used for any sexual purposes, does not depict the child in any sexually suggestive way, and has genuine artistic merit.
  6. The depiction is of a real child, was not made for or used for any sexual purposes, does not depict the child in any sexually suggestive way, and was kept for the private needs of a family.


Co-author: Simone Republic
Last edited by Jedinsto on Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
United Bongo States of America
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: May 30, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby United Bongo States of America » Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:20 am

For. Although I want a total ban in all forms.
Last edited by United Bongo States of America on Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Federation of Vanguard
Secretary
 
Posts: 31
Founded: Feb 05, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Federation of Vanguard » Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:23 am

The Orosian Assembly of the People Wishes to express its Full Support of this Proposal.
Last edited by Federation of Vanguard on Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Wait where am I, where's the Pizza God



The North Pacific's Resident Pizza Worshipper

User avatar
Kainin
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 48
Founded: Jan 03, 2022
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kainin » Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:23 am

For

User avatar
Cooee
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Dec 05, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby Cooee » Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:25 am

For

User avatar
Kenmoria
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 7910
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Kenmoria » Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:27 am

“I notice that there are no exceptions for artistic depictions, such as in classical artwork or sculpture. Neither are there exceptions for innocent familial photographs, since photographs of very young infants might feature those infants naked, with no suggestion of a sexual nature. This would be classified as pornographic, as it is a ‘nude depiction of one or more children’.”
Hello! I’m a GAer and NS Roleplayer from the United Kingdom.
My pronouns are he/him.
Any posts that I make as GenSec will be clearly marked as such and OOC. Conversely, my IC ambassador in the General Assembly is Ambassador Fortier. I’m always happy to discuss ideas about proposals, particularly if grammar or wording are in issue. I am also Executive Deputy Minister for the WA Ministry of TNP.
Kenmoria is an illiberal yet democratic nation pursuing the goals of communism in a semi-effective fashion. It has a very broad diplomatic presence despite being economically developing, mainly to seek help in recovering from the effect of a recent civil war. Read the factbook here for more information; perhaps, I will eventually finish it.

User avatar
West Barack and East Obama
Diplomat
 
Posts: 814
Founded: Apr 20, 2022
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby West Barack and East Obama » Fri Dec 09, 2022 8:42 am

OOC: Felony? Not every nation uses 'felonies'.
Sonnel is the place.

6x Issues Author | Political Figures | Sports Stuff

██████████

User avatar
Las Duendes
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Nov 17, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby Las Duendes » Fri Dec 09, 2022 9:30 am

Great now every parent who takes picture of naked child running around house will be guilty of international felony. Keep up good work!

User avatar
Second Peenadian
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 129
Founded: Dec 10, 2021
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Second Peenadian » Fri Dec 09, 2022 9:31 am

Full Support, Agree
The United States of Peenadian
Year:2756
NS Stats canon (some dont)
●NEWS|Rhubarbs are now Main dish for poor Peenaders! Thanks to 2 men|Peenadian budget is in danger|Airbous crash on Helitower, the landing gear was stolen by an Immigrant and sent to 4 years prison|Controversial speech made by Ghafur that his regime was a 7 times winning Election|Peenaders are shock by Habushtatals Slums|World war 3. or the Peenaders known as Grand Deathmatch involve one the greatest Peenadian-made weaponry

Officially called Peenadian, Second Peenadian is an old nation that no longer exist
Safety:63

User avatar
Hannasea
Diplomat
 
Posts: 888
Founded: Jul 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Hannasea » Fri Dec 09, 2022 9:32 am

"Opposed."

Daniella Russel, MA PhD,
Representing the office of:
Ambassador Brittany Hepburn
Semi-Permanent Representative to the World Assembly

User avatar
Zanderlock
Envoy
 
Posts: 203
Founded: Nov 07, 2022
Ex-Nation

All For This Draft.

Postby Zanderlock » Fri Dec 09, 2022 9:34 am

All for. Even If I was not, I would be too afraid to say opposed to something with the title of "BANNING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY"
Titles, Awards, And Other Achievements
Certified Laforeia Defender And Duck Loyalist QUACK
Professional Dumbass
Government Approved Joke Understanding Degree (Can Understand And Make Jokes)
Certified Meme Poster (Not Necessarily GOOD)
Master’s Degree In Cringe
I only have 7 lines, and have counted. In advance for any reports that could be made.

User avatar
Heidgaudr
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 437
Founded: Jun 25, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Heidgaudr » Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:02 am

Kenmoria wrote:“I notice that there are no exceptions for artistic depictions, such as in classical artwork or sculpture. Neither are there exceptions for innocent familial photographs, since photographs of very young infants might feature those infants naked, with no suggestion of a sexual nature. This would be classified as pornographic, as it is a ‘nude depiction of one or more children’.”

"Not to mention anatomical illustrations used by doctors and other medical professionals. Our delegation sees this proposal as being strictly worse than the resolution it's seeking to replace."
IC comments are from Amb. Asgeir Trelstad unless otherwise stated.
Factbooks: WA Staff | WA Agenda | Government | Religion | Demographics
Resolutions authored: GA#629, GA#638, GA#650

User avatar
Juansonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2279
Founded: Apr 01, 2022
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Juansonia » Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:20 am

Zanderlock wrote:All for. Even If I was not, I would be too afraid to say opposed to something with the title of "BANNING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY"
OOC: If it helps, just say "Opposed to a repeal of the WA's current ban on Child Pornography."
Hatsune Miku > British Imperialism
IC: MT if you ignore some stuff(mostly flavor), stats are not canon. Embassy link.
OOC: Owns and (sometimes) wears a maid outfit, wants to pair it with a FN SCAR-L. He/Him/His
Kernen did nothing wrong.
Space Squid wrote:Each sin should get it's own month.

Right now, Pride gets June, and Greed, Envy, and Gluttony have to share Thanksgiving/Black Friday through Christmas, Sloth gets one day in September, and Lust gets one day in February.

It's not equitable at all
Gandoor wrote:Cliché: A mod making a reply that's full of swearing after someone asks if you're allowed to swear on this site.

It makes me chuckle every time it happens.
Brits mistake Miku for their Anthem

User avatar
The Orwell Society
Minister
 
Posts: 2241
Founded: Apr 16, 2022
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby The Orwell Society » Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:23 am

Support
The Orwell Society
Straight Male | Political Alignment: Centrist leaning conservative | NSGP Alignment: Independent | Proud Wellspringer, join The Wellspring today!

A vision without action is just a daydream

User avatar
Jedinsto
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1196
Founded: Nov 12, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedinsto » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:12 am

United Bongo States of America wrote:For. Although I want a total ban in all forms.

"That's exactly what this is, so I suppose you're in luck."

Kenmoria wrote:“I notice that there are no exceptions for artistic depictions, such as in classical artwork or sculpture. Neither are there exceptions for innocent familial photographs, since photographs of very young infants might feature those infants naked, with no suggestion of a sexual nature. This would be classified as pornographic, as it is a ‘nude depiction of one or more children’.”


"In a prior version of this draft, such an exception was included, however it was removed due to a neglectful mistake. We appreciate your comment and will put the exception back in place."

West Barack and East Obama wrote:OOC: Felony? Not every nation uses 'felonies'.


OOC: How do you suggest I change this?

Las Duendes wrote:Great now every parent who takes picture of naked child running around house will be guilty of international felony. Keep up good work!


"A change will be made to the definition to accommodate for such things."

Hannasea wrote:"Opposed."

Daniella Russel, MA PhD,
Representing the office of:
Ambassador Brittany Hepburn
Semi-Permanent Representative to the World Assembly


"Why, may I ask?"
Heidgaudr wrote:
Kenmoria wrote:“I notice that there are no exceptions for artistic depictions, such as in classical artwork or sculpture. Neither are there exceptions for innocent familial photographs, since photographs of very young infants might feature those infants naked, with no suggestion of a sexual nature. This would be classified as pornographic, as it is a ‘nude depiction of one or more children’.”

"Not to mention anatomical illustrations used by doctors and other medical professionals. Our delegation sees this proposal as being strictly worse than the resolution it's seeking to replace."

"See clause 3i."

User avatar
GermanEmpire of kaisereich
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1653
Founded: Dec 02, 2022
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby GermanEmpire of kaisereich » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:19 am

The German Empire of Kaisereich fully supports this proposal, as it represses any act of violation of the physical integrity of a child, as an extremely conservative nation we support any proposal to protect the integrity of children.
Just a Futuristic, vengeful, militarized, expansionist German Empire, nothing much to worry about, unless you're one of my targets, then you need to worry. :P
A nation of 51.6 in democracy according to this https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=528862.
Victioria tears up Treaty and Peace banning Chemical Weapons production in Germany and the destruction of chemical weapons, chemical factories began producing chemical materials, ´´Chemical Terror´´ imminent.

User avatar
Goobergunchia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 2376
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Goobergunchia » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:21 am

We would be willing to consider a ban on exploitative fakes used to harm real people. We do not believe a repeal of "Child Pornography Ban" is needed to accomplish this.

We also do not believe it is a productive use of judicial resources to determine the ages of fictional characters.

[Lord] Michael Evif
Goobergunchian WA Ambassador

User avatar
Bananaistan
Senator
 
Posts: 3518
Founded: Apr 20, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bananaistan » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:57 am

"This is a deeply flawed proposal and is worse than the existing resolution in every material way and utterly misses the point that laws against child sexual material are for the protection of real children and not imaginary pixels, and definitely not consenting adults or teenagers sharing explicit, or in the case of the deeply flawed section 1iii here, images that are not even explicit but merely nude.

"The repeal which allow this proposal to become a possible law states that the old law is outdated in terms of modern ICT. Where is this alleged issue dealt with here? It's not as far as I can see. If anything, this ignores modern cloud computing to the detriment of civil freedoms everywhere and would ultimately raise the legitimate age of actors in pornography, the age at which partners can share explicit images of each other, etc to the highest age of majority of any nation in the WA. Consider where electronic images are stored and how they are transmitted.

"The definition of child based on the highest age in any relevant member state is deeply flawed. It would literally make international criminals of artists, photographers, amateur photographers and anyone with a smart phone. Take for example a legitimate non-sexual nude photograph or painting of an 18 year old in a country where the age of majority is 18. Should that painting or photograph be sold/given/sent to a person resident in a country where the age of majority is 21, the artist/photographer, the recipient and anyone involved in the transport of the painting/photography from A to B have now all become international criminals.

"Furthermore, regardless of the above issue, legitimately underaged individuals sharing images of themselves, for example a boyfriend and girlfriend, should not be turned into international criminals.

"The definition of "child pornography" entirely misses the point of laws against child sexual abuse materials which is to protect real children not imaginary pixels.

"The definition of "pornographic depiction" is nothing but prudery. It also misses the point of protecting children from sexual abuse. And it goes way too far.

"The wording of the exceptions is awful. It means that member states must haul all sorts of innocent people into courts before they can take advantage of any of these. What an awful waste of precious resources which could be better used catching and convicting actual criminals.

"In sum we are utterly opposed to this prudery. This proposal takes a sledgehammer to crack a nut and casts a net wide and far to make criminals of innocent people. The WA has no business doing so."
Last edited by Bananaistan on Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Delegation of the People's Republic of Bananaistan to the World Assembly
Head of delegation and the Permanent Representative: Comrade Ambassador Theodorus "Ted" Hornwood
General Assistant and Head of Security: Comrade Watchman Brian of Tarth
There was the Pope and John F. Kennedy and Jack Charlton and the three of them were staring me in the face.
Ideological Bulwark #281
THIS

User avatar
Kenmoria
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 7910
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Kenmoria » Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:03 pm

“I find myself convinced by the arguments by the delegation for Bananistan and by Ambassador Evif. As of the present moment, I cannot support this proposal. There may very well be problems with GA #300. However, these problems do not appear to be remedied by the current draft.”

Jedinsto wrote:
West Barack and East Obama wrote:OOC: Felony? Not every nation uses 'felonies'.


OOC: How do you suggest I change this?

(OOC: At least in the UK, there is not an equivalent concept, to my knowledge. I think the wording of “serious crime” would be better.)
Hello! I’m a GAer and NS Roleplayer from the United Kingdom.
My pronouns are he/him.
Any posts that I make as GenSec will be clearly marked as such and OOC. Conversely, my IC ambassador in the General Assembly is Ambassador Fortier. I’m always happy to discuss ideas about proposals, particularly if grammar or wording are in issue. I am also Executive Deputy Minister for the WA Ministry of TNP.
Kenmoria is an illiberal yet democratic nation pursuing the goals of communism in a semi-effective fashion. It has a very broad diplomatic presence despite being economically developing, mainly to seek help in recovering from the effect of a recent civil war. Read the factbook here for more information; perhaps, I will eventually finish it.

User avatar
Repreteop
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1063
Founded: Dec 01, 2020
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Repreteop » Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:05 pm

Im going to just say that im for this... although im disturbed that this actually has a potential for a debate.

(And that this is needed on a PG-13 game, even on forums)
Last edited by Repreteop on Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
*̡͌*̡̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡ ̡̡ ̡̡|̲̲̲͡͡͡ ̲▫̲͡ ̲̲̲͡͡π̲̲͡͡ ̲̲͡͡▫̲̲͡͡ ̲|,̡ ̴̡ı̴̡̡ *̡͌*Repreteop *̡͌*̡̡ ̴̡ı̴̴̡ ̡̡ ̡̡|̲̲̲͡͡͡ ̲▫̲͡ ̲̲̲͡͡π̲̲͡͡ ̲̲͡͡▫̲̲͡͡ ̲|,̡ ̴̡ı̴̡̡ *̡͌*
Repreteop wrote:I have never wanted to fast. I like food too much. Though we always ate light after Yom Kippur. Bagels, lox, whitefish.
Sucks when you want to fast too.
(Somebody edited this lol)

User avatar
GermanEmpire of kaisereich
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1653
Founded: Dec 02, 2022
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby GermanEmpire of kaisereich » Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:10 pm

Bananaistan wrote:"This is a deeply flawed proposal and is worse than the existing resolution in every material way and utterly misses the point that laws against child sexual material are for the protection of real children and not imaginary pixels, and definitely not consenting adults or teenagers sharing explicit, or in the case of the deeply flawed section 1iii here, images that are not even explicit but merely nude.

"The repeal which allow this proposal to become a possible law states that the old law is outdated in terms of modern ICT. Where is this alleged issue dealt with here? It's not as far as I can see. If anything, this ignores modern cloud computing to the detriment of civil freedoms everywhere and would ultimately raise the legitimate age of actors in pornography, the age at which partners can share explicit images of each other, etc to the highest age of majority of any nation in the WA. Consider where electronic images are stored and how they are transmitted.

"The definition of child based on the highest age in any relevant member state is deeply flawed. It would literally make international criminals of artists, photographers, amateur photographers and anyone with a smart phone. Take for example a legitimate non-sexual nude photograph or painting of an 18 year old in a country where the age of majority is 18. Should that painting or photograph be sold/given/sent to a person resident in a country where the age of majority is 21, the artist/photographer, the recipient and anyone involved in the transport of the painting/photography from A to B have now all become international criminals.

"Furthermore, regardless of the above issue, legitimately underaged individuals sharing images of themselves, for example a boyfriend and girlfriend, should not be turned into international criminals.

"The definition of "child pornography" entirely misses the point of laws against child sexual abuse materials which is to protect real children not imaginary pixels.

"The definition of "pornographic depiction" is nothing but prudery. It also misses the point of protecting children from sexual abuse. And it goes way too far.

"The wording of the exceptions is awful. It means that member states must haul all sorts of innocent people into courts before they can take advantage of any of these. What an awful waste of precious resources which could be better used catching and convicting actual criminals.

"In sum we are utterly opposed to this prudery. This proposal takes a sledgehammer to crack a nut and casts a net wide and far to make criminals of innocent people. The WA has no business doing so."

So it would be better to add that the prohibition would vary from country to country, depending on the age required to declare the age of majority going from National State to National State, but the focus of the proposal remains on children who are very young, the proposal really is interesting, and may change from country to country. Depending a lot on the legislation of each member country.
Last edited by GermanEmpire of kaisereich on Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Just a Futuristic, vengeful, militarized, expansionist German Empire, nothing much to worry about, unless you're one of my targets, then you need to worry. :P
A nation of 51.6 in democracy according to this https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=528862.
Victioria tears up Treaty and Peace banning Chemical Weapons production in Germany and the destruction of chemical weapons, chemical factories began producing chemical materials, ´´Chemical Terror´´ imminent.

User avatar
Underwater Sovereignties
Attaché
 
Posts: 87
Founded: Apr 16, 2018
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Underwater Sovereignties » Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:12 pm

The Federation of Underwater Sovereignties fully supports this proposal. Such material should be entirely forbidden.
Last edited by Underwater Sovereignties on Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Attempted Socialism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1681
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Attempted Socialism » Fri Dec 09, 2022 1:53 pm

I agree with the opinions (As stated IC) of Heidgaudr and Banana. I don't see a need to repeal the current resolution, and this appears to be substantially worse.


Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide
Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship.
Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt?
Bobberino: "The academic tone shines through."
Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes
My NS career

User avatar
Juansonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2279
Founded: Apr 01, 2022
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Juansonia » Fri Dec 09, 2022 3:33 pm

Jedinsto wrote:
United Bongo States of America wrote:For. Although I want a total ban in all forms.

"That's exactly what this is, so I suppose you're in luck."

"I think that they are talking about a complete ban on pornography, with no regard for whether the content in question is child sex abuse material."
- Maria-Fernanda Novo, WA Ambassador for the Armed Republic of Juansonia
Hatsune Miku > British Imperialism
IC: MT if you ignore some stuff(mostly flavor), stats are not canon. Embassy link.
OOC: Owns and (sometimes) wears a maid outfit, wants to pair it with a FN SCAR-L. He/Him/His
Kernen did nothing wrong.
Space Squid wrote:Each sin should get it's own month.

Right now, Pride gets June, and Greed, Envy, and Gluttony have to share Thanksgiving/Black Friday through Christmas, Sloth gets one day in September, and Lust gets one day in February.

It's not equitable at all
Gandoor wrote:Cliché: A mod making a reply that's full of swearing after someone asks if you're allowed to swear on this site.

It makes me chuckle every time it happens.
Brits mistake Miku for their Anthem

User avatar
TURTLESHROOM II
Senator
 
Posts: 4128
Founded: Dec 08, 2014
Right-wing Utopia

Postby TURTLESHROOM II » Fri Dec 09, 2022 3:45 pm

The cheers in the vents revealed the neck of a tortoise that stuck out of one of the ducts in the ceiling.

"I really cain't believe the Devil's Congregate was capable of any good. Yet, here we are, FINALLY debatin' a REAL punishment'a child porn. God bless y'all!!"

Familiarizing himself with the document, the ceiling turtle had a suggestion to make.

"Article Three, Clauses Five and Six are rather vague. What exactly does it mean when y'all say 'not made or used fer sexual purposes'? This could be construed to allow for a nekkid key-id, because some more perver- sorry, libertine societies don't think nudity's obscene. Let's make sure we amend Article Three, Clause Five to specify that you cain't have no nekkid key-ids."

From his ceiling vantage point, the turtle thought for a moment, turning his head at the wall, and then back.

"I think that definin' what is nekkid and what ain't might be a good idear. Societies that think nipples ain't nekkid could peddle smut to nations that do, and it would allow certain 'porn shelters' to avoid prosecution."

"I would say, for an underaged, human female, it'd be the whole of the buttocks, the whole of the crotch and thighs, and both any breast tissue and the nipples."

"For an underaged, male human, it would be the whole of the buttocks and the whole of the crotch and thighs."

The turtle smiled as much as he could without lips, expressing his satisfaction.

"One last thing. You ain't got no mandatory minimum sentencin'. Not every nation has capital punishment, but they DO have life in prison. For the sake of everyone, you should specifically say that anyone with child porn should either be put to death OR given life in prison, without any possibility of parole."
Jesus loves you and died for you!
World Factbook
First Constitution
Legation Quarter
"NOOKULAR" STOCKPILE: 701,033 fission and dropping, 7 fusion.
CM wrote:Have I reached peak enlightened centrism yet? I'm getting chills just thinking about taking an actual position.

Proctopeo wrote:anarcho-von habsburgism

Lillorainen wrote:"Tengri's balls, [do] boys really never grow up?!"
Nuroblav wrote:On the contrary! Seize the means of ROBOT ARMS!
News ticker (updated 4/6/2024 AD):

As TS adapts to new normal, large flagellant sects remain -|- TurtleShroom forfeits imperial dignity -|- "Skibidi Toilet" creator awarded highest artistic honor for contributions to wholesome family entertainment (obscene gestures cut out)

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads