by Hustlertwo » Wed Nov 23, 2022 11:16 am
by WayNeacTia » Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:24 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by The Serendipitous » Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:57 pm
by New Rogernomics » Thu Nov 24, 2022 9:00 am
Meh, repeal all the badges ever passed by the WA. Then make people fight for them in gladiatorial combat, and the winner gets their badge passed through the WA. Now that's what I'd pay to see.Wayneactia wrote:I see the vultures and opportunists are lining up, tripping over their own shoelaces….
by The Universe World » Thu Nov 24, 2022 9:18 am
WayNeacTia wrote:Why admit to to something, when you can just deny it and release a word salad composed solely of bullshit?
by Honeydewistania » Thu Nov 24, 2022 9:23 am
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by The Universe World » Thu Nov 24, 2022 9:24 am
Honeydewistania wrote:I'm not certain how threatening to invade regions who voted for a proposal over ten years ago is disproven by The Black Hawks' raiding a few days ago. And just because a raider (or anyone) is less active now doesn't negate previous levels of activity.
WayNeacTia wrote:Why admit to to something, when you can just deny it and release a word salad composed solely of bullshit?
by Honeydewistania » Thu Nov 24, 2022 9:26 am
The Universe World wrote:Honeydewistania wrote:I'm not certain how threatening to invade regions who voted for a proposal over ten years ago is disproven by The Black Hawks' raiding a few days ago. And just because a raider (or anyone) is less active now doesn't negate previous levels of activity.
What proposal?
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by The Universe World » Thu Nov 24, 2022 9:27 am
WayNeacTia wrote:Why admit to to something, when you can just deny it and release a word salad composed solely of bullshit?
by Astrobolt » Thu Nov 24, 2022 2:34 pm
by WayNeacTia » Thu Nov 24, 2022 3:28 pm
Astrobolt wrote:Full support for the idea but for this resolution I would want someone experienced to be the author, or potentially join you as a coauthor.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Mechanocracy » Thu Nov 24, 2022 4:07 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Astrobolt wrote:Full support for the idea but for this resolution I would want someone experienced to be the author, or potentially join you as a coauthor.
I am quite sure it is already being worked on. As soon as the political fires are back down to a dull roar, I am quite sure Q or one of his puppets will have it up on the boards for us to “debate”…
by The Universe World » Fri Nov 25, 2022 1:46 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Astrobolt wrote:Full support for the idea but for this resolution I would want someone experienced to be the author, or potentially join you as a coauthor.
I am quite sure it is already being worked on. As soon as the political fires are back down to a dull roar, I am quite sure Q or one of his puppets will have it up on the boards for us to “debate”…
WayNeacTia wrote:Why admit to to something, when you can just deny it and release a word salad composed solely of bullshit?
by Xatu the Great » Fri Nov 25, 2022 4:02 pm
Discoveria wrote:Port blood is a raider through and through. Honest.
Sedgistan wrote:Attempted threadjack on sandwiches and satanism removed.
anonymous:Does anyone, other than Port Blood, know the Legend of Port Blood?Tim-Opolis wrote:The Salt Mines will be fueled for months by the tears of silly fascists.
by RiderSyl » Sat Nov 26, 2022 11:37 am
by The Universe World » Sat Nov 26, 2022 12:06 pm
RiderSyl wrote:Personally, I'd like to see some goddamn consistency from this council and its tyranny-by-majority.
If the same people that supported Repeal Condemn Koth and Repeal Condemn EWS actually believed the IC positions they took, they'd be stumbling over themselves to rally behind this proposal too.
But here we are. 3 days later, all we have here are Honeydew and Astrobolt pretending to have the standards they conveniently forgor during Repeal EWS.
Full send with the WA strategy of raider accomplishment erasure or get off the soapbox. This half-hearted shit is weak for a combined faction with so much political weight.
If you full send it, I'll actually support it. My near-constant siding with raiders in the public arena is enough to make one forget that I'm an indie here. I'm done trying to stomp the brake pedal on this crazy train. Lead foot all the way. Let's see if the path you want to take is really so great.
WayNeacTia wrote:Why admit to to something, when you can just deny it and release a word salad composed solely of bullshit?
by Astrobolt » Sat Nov 26, 2022 12:19 pm
RiderSyl wrote:Personally, I'd like to see some goddamn consistency from this council and its tyranny-by-majority.
If the same people that supported Repeal Condemn Koth and Repeal Condemn EWS actually believed the IC positions they took, they'd be stumbling over themselves to rally behind this proposal too.
But here we are. 3 days later, all we have here are Honeydew and Astrobolt pretending to have the standards they conveniently forgor during Repeal EWS.
by WayNeacTia » Sat Nov 26, 2022 4:29 pm
Astrobolt wrote:RiderSyl wrote:Personally, I'd like to see some goddamn consistency from this council and its tyranny-by-majority.
If the same people that supported Repeal Condemn Koth and Repeal Condemn EWS actually believed the IC positions they took, they'd be stumbling over themselves to rally behind this proposal too.
But here we are. 3 days later, all we have here are Honeydew and Astrobolt pretending to have the standards they conveniently forgor during Repeal EWS.
With all due respect, you have no clue what I believed regarding that proposal, what my thoughts were, what standards I value. Next time, keep your ridiculous comments to yourself.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by The Orwell Society » Sat Nov 26, 2022 5:46 pm
The Orwell Society
Straight Male | Political Alignment: Centrist leaning conservative | NSGP Alignment: Independent | Proud Wellspringer, join The Wellspring today!A vision without action is just a daydream
by The Universe World » Sat Nov 26, 2022 6:18 pm
WayNeacTia wrote:Why admit to to something, when you can just deny it and release a word salad composed solely of bullshit?
by RiderSyl » Sun Nov 27, 2022 2:51 pm
Astrobolt wrote:With all due respect, you have no clue what I believed regarding that proposal, what my thoughts were, what standards I value. Next time, keep your ridiculous comments to yourself.
by Hustlertwo » Wed Nov 30, 2022 4:41 am
The Universe World wrote:RiderSyl wrote:Personally, I'd like to see some goddamn consistency from this council and its tyranny-by-majority.
If the same people that supported Repeal Condemn Koth and Repeal Condemn EWS actually believed the IC positions they took, they'd be stumbling over themselves to rally behind this proposal too.
But here we are. 3 days later, all we have here are Honeydew and Astrobolt pretending to have the standards they conveniently forgor during Repeal EWS.
Full send with the WA strategy of raider accomplishment erasure or get off the soapbox. This half-hearted shit is weak for a combined faction with so much political weight.
If you full send it, I'll actually support it. My near-constant siding with raiders in the public arena is enough to make one forget that I'm an indie here. I'm done trying to stomp the brake pedal on this crazy train. Lead foot all the way. Let's see if the path you want to take is really so great.
I will support it as well solely because I feel SC#52 is poorly written and irrelevant since TBH has another condemnation to fall back on.
by Astrobolt » Wed Nov 30, 2022 7:26 am
Hustlertwo wrote:The Universe World wrote:I will support it as well solely because I feel SC#52 is poorly written and irrelevant since TBH has another condemnation to fall back on.
That was what prompted me to write this. 52 is clearly the weaker of their two condemnations, and the recent events proved it is a lot of worry over nothing. Black Hawks tried their best and still couldn't change the voting results enough to halt the repeal of a condemnation to one of their most notable members. This being a resolution primarily directed at exactly that scenario, which clearly is never going to come to pass, seemed too perfect to pass up.
As for a co-author, I'm not opposed to the idea, depending on what they brought to the table. Mostly I'd be looking for someone more familiar with all the lore of raiders vs. defenders. I'm a bit on the outside of all that.
Added a bit at the end to drive home how silly it is for TBH to have two condemnations. Honestly, it kinda always was. They should have repealed and replaced 52 to begin with.
Any final suggestions before this is submitted?
by Varanius » Wed Nov 30, 2022 7:57 am
Angeloid Astraea wrote:I can't think of anyone that creates controversy out of nothing better than you!
Excidium Planetis wrote:Yeah, if you could enlighten me as to why you're such an asshole, that would be great.
Koth wrote:Vara is such a dedicated hater, it's impressive
Mlakhavia wrote:Vara isn't a gameplay personality, he's a concentrated ball of spite
by Hustlertwo » Wed Nov 30, 2022 8:52 am
Astrobolt wrote:Hustlertwo wrote:
That was what prompted me to write this. 52 is clearly the weaker of their two condemnations, and the recent events proved it is a lot of worry over nothing. Black Hawks tried their best and still couldn't change the voting results enough to halt the repeal of a condemnation to one of their most notable members. This being a resolution primarily directed at exactly that scenario, which clearly is never going to come to pass, seemed too perfect to pass up.
As for a co-author, I'm not opposed to the idea, depending on what they brought to the table. Mostly I'd be looking for someone more familiar with all the lore of raiders vs. defenders. I'm a bit on the outside of all that.
Added a bit at the end to drive home how silly it is for TBH to have two condemnations. Honestly, it kinda always was. They should have repealed and replaced 52 to begin with.
Any final suggestions before this is submitted?
Don’t submit this. This will likely fail at vote.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement