by The Ideal Britain » Fri Sep 23, 2022 12:46 pm
by Crimson Tree » Fri Sep 23, 2022 12:49 pm
by The Ideal Britain » Fri Sep 23, 2022 12:52 pm
Crimson Tree wrote:The protestors have our support. That's a blatantly misogynistic bill and the Parliament should be ashamed. We thought Britain was supposed to be quite accepting of women, especially after the Suffragette movement.
by Crimson Tree » Fri Sep 23, 2022 12:56 pm
Chimi Akagi in a scalding response says:
I'm sorry? You've forbidden schools and colleges from telling students that women are allowed to be their own person - forcing young minds to be taught that women are supposed to follow their supposed role in society as 'the fairer gender.' You are an appalling man, Sikandar Khan.
by The Ideal Britain » Fri Sep 23, 2022 1:24 pm
Crimson Tree wrote:Chimi Akagi in a scalding response says:
I'm sorry? You've forbidden schools and colleges from telling students that women are allowed to be their own person - forcing young minds to be taught that women are supposed to follow their supposed role in society as 'the fairer gender.' You are an appalling man, Sikandar Khan.
by Yokashai Israel » Fri Sep 23, 2022 1:29 pm
by Crimson Tree » Fri Sep 23, 2022 1:33 pm
The Ideal Britain wrote:Crimson Tree wrote:Chimi Akagi in a scalding response says:
I'm sorry? You've forbidden schools and colleges from telling students that women are allowed to be their own person - forcing young minds to be taught that women are supposed to follow their supposed role in society as 'the fairer gender.' You are an appalling man, Sikandar Khan.
“You should look at the details of what the law says, ma’am. It does forbid the criticism of specific gender roles, it only forbids two things.
1. Promoting inverse gender roles e.g. advocating for the conscription of women exclusively as opposed to either the conscription of men only, the conscription of all genders or the conscription of neither.
And
2. Being against gender roles per se I.e. saying ‘gender roles should not exist.’”
I don't think you understand. This bill promotes the idea that gender roles should exist which will inevitably lead to further issues. Gender roles are outdated.
by The Ideal Britain » Fri Sep 23, 2022 1:43 pm
Crimson Tree wrote:The Ideal Britain wrote:“You should look at the details of what the law says, ma’am. It does forbid the criticism of specific gender roles, it only forbids two things.
1. Promoting inverse gender roles e.g. advocating for the conscription of women exclusively as opposed to either the conscription of men only, the conscription of all genders or the conscription of neither.
And
2. Being against gender roles per se I.e. saying ‘gender roles should not exist.’”I don't think you understand. This bill promotes the idea that gender roles should exist which will inevitably lead to further issues. Gender roles are outdated.
We here in Yokashai Israel don't believe it's misogynistic but we believe it's more old-fashioned and primitive.
[Also if it's really gonna be that bare bones of a law please state what is the entirety of it instead of leaving it ambiguous and having your politicians get offended.
(This is OOC but for a little bit I couldn't tell if this was legit or not. That's just how far gone we are)
by Crimson Tree » Fri Sep 23, 2022 1:45 pm
I was a little annoyed - but still, you shouldn't give people ammunition for hate crimes like this.
by The Ideal Britain » Fri Sep 23, 2022 1:47 pm
Crimson Tree wrote:I was a little annoyed - but still, you shouldn't give people ammunition for hate crimes like this.
by Countesia » Fri Sep 23, 2022 1:50 pm
>Britain
>200,000 Police OfficersI can almost hear the tories laughing
by Crimson Tree » Fri Sep 23, 2022 1:55 pm
by The Ideal Britain » Fri Sep 23, 2022 2:49 pm
Britain
>200,000 Police Officers
I can almost hear the tories laughing
"Take me for example, I'm an intersex woman. Well, I prefer the term hermaphrodite even if they say it's outdated." She shrugs. "Anyway, as both male and female biologically, what gender roles would I have?"
by Crimson Tree » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:19 am
by The Ideal Britain » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:21 am
Crimson Tree wrote:"Okay, but why?"
by Crimson Tree » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:26 am
by The Ideal Britain » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:27 am
Crimson Tree wrote:"What the hell do you mean brainwashing? You're basically doing that now!"
by Crimson Tree » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:37 am
by The Ideal Britain » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:42 am
Crimson Tree wrote:"Then the bill is pointless. Just abolish it and reform the curriculum to allow discussion of both sides."
by Federal Republic of Trasia » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:44 am
by Crimson Tree » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:47 am
by The Ideal Britain » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:51 am
Crimson Tree wrote:"You've still yet to give me a solid reason this bill exists. These reasons feel like poor excuses more than anything. "
by Crimson Tree » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:58 am
by Nationalist Northumbria » Sat Sep 24, 2022 12:01 pm
Crimson Tree wrote:She rubs her temples.
"Ugh... Nice try, but you aren't close enough to call me that yet... It'd be Akagi-hakase. Still, I'm interested in more of your justifications."
by The Ideal Britain » Sat Sep 24, 2022 12:06 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Gavia Penguis, Google [Bot], Jogja, Upper Quwartedon
Advertisement