Advertisement
by Aenglide » Thu Aug 04, 2022 4:19 am
by Britonisea » Thu Aug 04, 2022 2:13 pm
WINNER OF THE 112ND WORLDVISION SONG CONTEST
LISTEN NOW: KIANA KNIGHT - SAYONARA
by StrayaRoos » Thu Aug 04, 2022 2:28 pm
by Alezian Union » Fri Aug 05, 2022 6:20 am
And welcome back to Alezia's attempt to create new history in Operation Worldvision! We have heard the five songs, by five artists, and three regions and one region who got to sing twice in this episode (North Alezia)!
Now comes the most nervewrecking part of the competition. The voting. All those moments of winning the regional final could be repeated today. The voting shall be divided into three segments. National Juries which will be contacted from Trishi, Doorsbreeken, Zafizamarrah, and Bucinnois. After that, we shall contact the international juries, where before, we would like to thank the juries from Strayaroos, Carrelie, Beepee, Malta Comino Gozo, Polkopia, and Britonisea for helping us bring back Alezia to Worldvision Pop Status!. And finally, the Alezian public shall give the last vote. During the performances, we give you 5 votes to give through ARICO.Net, FABA Stores, and the ABA's website. Anyway, we shall start with the...The numbers on the boxes below represented the amount each participant gets by the digits.
SONG NO. 1 Receives 12,144,327 votes (5th -> 6 points)
SONG NO. 2 Receives 14,332,967 votes (4th -> 7 points)
SONG NO. 3 Receives 77,233,694 votes (1st -> 12 points)
SONG NO. 4 Receives 64,443,999 votes (3rd -> 8 points)
SONG NO. 5 Receives 66,543,214 votes (2nd ->10 points)
And thus concludes the votes. And finally...
DINARUDDINA YOU DID IT,
You will be representing the Alezian Union
at the 101st Worldvision Song Contest!
Congratulations!
Nation Name: Alezian Union
Official Broadcaster: ABA (Alezian Broadcasting Authority)
Song Title: I Broke My Truce
Artist(s) Name(s): Dinaruddina Almara
Tune: Doda - My Melody
by Carrelie » Fri Aug 05, 2022 6:29 am
by Besen » Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:29 pm
by Estana and Thaos » Fri Aug 05, 2022 7:59 pm
by The Hlhata States » Sun Aug 07, 2022 11:00 am
by South Batoko » Sun Aug 07, 2022 1:08 pm
Weather station in Baxtaqaś (Dürlüśćüm) collapses, outages at weather services reported
by Axuva » Sun Aug 07, 2022 6:59 pm
by Britonisea » Mon Aug 08, 2022 11:59 am
WINNER OF THE 112ND WORLDVISION SONG CONTEST
LISTEN NOW: KIANA KNIGHT - SAYONARA
by Llalta » Mon Aug 08, 2022 11:59 am
~ ~
Sanctuary in the Symphony!
~
~ Sanctuary in the Symphony by Himiko Arden~
It’s hard to live
In the dissonance, and I
Can't tell between, yeah
Major or minor key
But sometimes I cannot face the future
I never seem to be any stronger, when
The music, lifts me from, this daydream
The emotions I cannot hide, like fireworks
So I sing out, sing louder
So the whole world can hear me
Even in the silence
In the cacophony
There is a melody
And then everything harmonises
A sanctuary in the symphony
That can set you free
The song of the soul5 mins 0 seconds
Music - Himiko Arden, John Marshall
Lyrics - Himiko Arden, John Marshall
© Laniakea Music
by WorldVision Committee » Mon Aug 08, 2022 2:59 pm
by Antenovaria » Tue Aug 09, 2022 2:26 am
by Hafamarimyht » Wed Aug 10, 2022 11:39 pm
by Polkopia » Thu Aug 11, 2022 5:51 am
World, stop voting now!
Landa vy Polkopiya Grand Final:
#1. Staša Redd – Higher
Language: English
Tune: ELYSA - Fire
#2.MJ Heart – Over You
Language: English
Tune: SG Lewis - Missing You
#3.Mariio Kharpin - Na Vsegda
Language: Polkopian
Title Translation: Forever
Tune: Álvaro de Luna - Juramento eterno de sal
#4.An Na – Don't Fall In Love
Language: English, Polkopian
Tune: CHUNG HA - Love Me Out Loud
#5.Evgelina - Tornado
Language: Polkopian
Title Translation: Tornado
Tune: Ronela Hajati - Caramel
by WorldVision Committee » Thu Aug 11, 2022 10:32 pm
by Malta Comino Gozo » Fri Aug 12, 2022 2:15 am
by Aenglide » Fri Aug 12, 2022 2:42 am
What is your stance on semis being introduced?
As stated in my manifesto, I really like the idea of semis and how it was executed in WV100 was very good. I think that if we want to keep semi-finals, we will need two things, a consistent large number of participating countries and eligible entries, and fairness. In WV100, we unfortunately had to keep some entries in the semi-finals as they did not qualify. This is a major concern for some countries who are fearful that they will not be able to qualify to the final as much as others and the people who don’t qualify miss out on the fun of the Grand Final. This reason is why I don’t think there should be semi-finals every time we have a large number of countries, but to throw the idea out there, maybe we could have a contest with semi-finals once every [X] number of contests, given that there are also enough countries to make that happen.
Will you keep joke entries? Would you make "low effort low quality" entries legal?
As a person who has a joke puppet in Worldvision, joke entries should be allowed, however I think these entries should have some effort put into their entries, and not just as an excuse to give 5 points to your main. It’s quite a tradeoff - if you want to reward yourself by killing people’s ears and by giving yourself some extra points, you should have to write a decent and an up-to-standard amount of roleplay.
Is there clear and thorough evidence of a bloc in the WMCA alliance. Without the alliance having a name would this even be brought up?
As an observer member of the WMCA alliance, I feel that because WMCA is an alliance with strong ties between all its members, it’s a group that is the most suspected of being a bloc. I’ll say that there are other blocs within WV, but they’re never called upon because they are never specified into one singular group.
Aenglide had voted highly for WMCA members in WV100, but these are my votes with explanation (which will also be talked about below). Alezian Union received 10 points from Aenglide, and this was purely because of his commendable efforts as he sang his own tune. If any other person sang their own tune, they would have also received high scores from me. This is not WMCA related at all. Malta Comino Gozo received 8 points from Aenglide, and this was purely IC, as they sent in a nordic-pop song, and ICly, this would get high scores from Aenglish jury since Aenglide is a nordic country.
In your manifesto you claim to want to help those who need help in making their entries etc. Do you need to be on the committee to do this?
Nope, of course not. We have a dedicated channel in our discord server for helping people with their entries #theworkshop, and anyone can help anybody. I meant that if anyone is worried about falling behind and not qualifying for semi-finals, that I could be one of the people out of everybody in the WV community that they could get help from. I mention that I’m happy to help with anything, but you don’t need to be a committee member for that.
Additionally, how do you force people to give an explanation as to why they voted for a song, when often, there isn’t one and they are in fact just voting for their friends?
This was just a hypothetical idea with no big ideas, but I think that potentially, people could have a reason for voting for a country in their votes. It doesn’t have to be a long explanation, but just a simple reason why an entry is deserving of [X] points. I can see how this can have many flaws, but any reason is better than none, and it could decrease the amount of accusations we have in the community about people suspecting blocs here and there.
by Britonisea » Fri Aug 12, 2022 3:56 am
I'm not sure whether this is currently done, but I do believe that the current committee should work together before they open the OOC thread of the 102nd WorldVision Song Contest (which by the way according to previous rules should be delayed by a week/extended sign-up week to allow for new rules to be put in place), where us committee members would rotate doing things. For example
Opening the thread
102 Committee Member 1
103 Committee Member 2
104 Committee Member 3
105 Committee Member 4
106 Committee Member 5
This would ensure that everyone is doing the same amount of work. We can see who's strength is who - so for example, if I'm the best at mathematics alongside Committee Member 2 then one of us can be in charge of doing the telelvote, one can do the jury vote and then the other committee members can be in charge of "peer-reviewing it". Whoever peer-reviews and is in charge of the televote will ALL be decided during the extended WV102 period so that it's in writing. It can also be publicised too so that members of the community can see who's doing their job and who isn't. If we want to go further, on the shared document, we can also write down our name and the time we've peer-reviewed it so that we can make sure it's done and miscommunication- which seems to be a grave issue with the current community - isn't an issue anymore.
If people would like me to a document with everything I believe needs to be scheduled out (so you can have more of an idea of what I'm speaking about)...let me know! I will happily do one!
WINNER OF THE 112ND WORLDVISION SONG CONTEST
LISTEN NOW: KIANA KNIGHT - SAYONARA
by Alezian Union » Fri Aug 12, 2022 7:00 am
by Carrelie » Fri Aug 12, 2022 8:02 am
What is your stance on semis being introduced?
As stated in my manifesto, I would absolutely love to keep semi-finals if a sufficient number of nations is reached. Should I be elected, I'll be working together with the rest of the committee as well as the community to really decide this threshold.
Will you keep joke entries? Would you make "low effort low quality" entries legal?
To some extent, I'd argue that joke entries are what make Worldvision truly Worldvision. Perusing through whatever the likes of Placely or Crustyland have sent for any given edition is always a delight, but I do agree that some joke entries have absolutely zero effort put into them. As such, low effort and low quality joke entries should absolutely not be allowed to participate in the contest or send in votes.
Is there clear and thorough evidence of a bloc in the WMCA alliance. Without the alliance having a name would this even be brought up?
As an WMCA member myself, I'm not sure I can answer this question without at least a hint of bias, nor would I expect as such for any of the other prospective committee members. However, I believe that WMCA is not inherently a voting bloc. We've come together on the basis of IC cooperation, and sure there are vote exchanges every now and then but not nearly to the magnitude of some other blocs we've seen. I believe similar interests and tastes within this alliance of ours are mostly to blame for this voting.
Can you please elaborate on how you would implement the two ideas you put forward in your manifesto? Specifically, HOW you will help grow the contest (what methods), and HOW you intend to make the community more active in committee decisions. On the latter point, do you not think this will slow the committee down during entry reviews etc?
I'd like to thank whoever sent in this question because I should've absolutely elaborated on this in the manifesto itself. So let's take this question one step at a time...HOW will you help grow the contest?
While I admit I'm a little low on ideas for this one, I can see some interesting methods working. Namely, I propose that expanding our IIWiki presence will expand this contest somewhat. Nowadays IIWiki is a hub for in character NS information, and making our presence on there known as some of my fellow candidates have suggested is sure to bring in those who are interested and likely to stick around for more than one edition (as well as contributing some lovely RP :D). Should this not work, I'd be open to other suggestions such as inviting old faces back to this contest of ours.HOW do you intend to make the community more active in committee decisions?
This part has a few answers. First of all, I'd like to experiment with a suggestions form where members of our community both on and off Discord can suggest what could be improved about the contest in an official manner where it's sure to be brought up by the committee. Second of all, I'd like to implement polls for any decisions the committee makes. While these will most likely be restricted to the Discord side of things, I can see it working as a way to effectively gather an opinion on any given issue.On the latter point, do you not think this will slow the committee down during entry reviews etc?
It's unfortunate, but not every part of the committee process can be guided by the community. To this point, I'd propose that the entry reviews remain a committee-only process without any community input. Since writing my manifesto, I have come to terms with the fact that this inclusion of input may slow down our decision making slightly, but in most cases that is a sacrifice I am willing to make. However, should the decision require immediate action it will unfortunately have to be made without asking the community beforehand.
by StrayaRoos » Fri Aug 12, 2022 9:13 am
WorldVision Committee wrote:- Will you keep joke entries? Would you make "low effort low quality" entries legal?
WorldVision Committee wrote:- Is there clear and thorough evidence of a bloc in the WMCA alliance. Without the alliance having a name would this even be brought up?
WorldVision Committee wrote:
- Your solution to bloc voting refers specifically to a situation in which we get semi finals. Do you believe there was an example of somebody who did not qualify to the final last edition because of bloc voting?
WorldVision Committee wrote:[*]With all due respect, isn't the IIWiki WV archive something you could do without needing to be elected on Committee? Also are you truly prepared to pore through and analyze 100 editions of WV voting? Most modern participants haven't even been around for half that time.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement