Stock Photo: Lower Chamber of Parliament
by: Art Chase
SAUVILLE - The House of Delegates, Abetton's lower chamber of parliament, passed the Goods and Service Tax Review Bill proposed by Delegate Arthur Cressida of the House of Cressida, in April and after debate and discussion finally passed with a vote of 220-203 where it will now go to the upper chamber, House of Lords, where it is expected to pass, for final vote and approval before making way to the King whom is expected to sign it. The bill among other things, reviews the taxation of goods and services of the GST bill of 1877, a bill which placed various taxation on many different luxury goods history which today includes things like personal cars, personal electronics, mobile phones, internet services and other matters and in history, electricity, travel and so on. Each taxation has a various range and each price has been adjusted over the years but Sir Cressida proposed an outright repeal of all luxury taxes to bolster Abetton's economy and empower the consumer to be able to buy more items.
"Our Provence, for example" Mr. Cressida said, "Electricity is often still considered a high luxury as are phones, I think this long dated tax code has held Abetton back from emerging as an economic power."
The bill's co-delegate, Ms. Scarlett Mayne, agrees the bill needed a major reworking. "My co-delegate's concern is economic, mine is more historical justice. The bill was really first made as a means to restrict former slaves and segregated classes from obtaining wealth or a workable lifestyle, continuing a cycle of incertitude and often involuntary slavery. It's a good time for us to rexamine the bill."
The hope of abolishing all luxury taxes seemed to stall the bill's progress, with opponents arguing it would shift the burden further into income taxes and result in a gutting of Social programs. Delegate Arthur Loundsberry of Sauville raised the concern. "I feel my co-delegates are thinking from a good place and the bill has promise but I feel repealing the taxes would cause further economic issues that we weren't ready to handle. Thus I proposed a compromise that would bring the rates down significantly thus we don't have to lose all income and don't have to shift a greater burden onto the income taxes"
Further opposition of the bill erred concerns about the effect this would have on society. Outside the House, Lord Rieden of Sudburry, said he would oppose the bill when it comes up to the House of Lords. "This kingdom is built on hard work and studious duty. Last thing we need is more nonsensical outside ideas to further dilute this fine nation of ours." Lady Annabelle Dowager of Lillah, the home domain of Delegate Cressida, also opposes the bill. "Our area of the nation is very agrarian, it's a lot of smaller farms and homesteads and villages across. Some call this dated and old fashioned but I think it's what retains Abetton's class and culture. Besides that, a reduction of abolition of the luxury taxes will mean higher income burdens on the working farmers across the land, expenses they can ill afford."
By contrast, Lord Ignatius of the same Provence disagrees with his fellow Lady, feeling this will only benefit the working peoples of his Lillah. "The bill is proposed by members of our Lordship family of Lillah, it must be a good mill and I agree with many aspects. I feel we can always iron out newer details as they are needed but this is a great start."