[R] Flamebaiting/Trolling in US Politics Thread

[New haven america]

He's been told 1/2 a dozen times now to stop interacting with me and yet he still keeps baiting/flaming on a weekly basis and nothing has been done about it:

The presence of Orthodox, Anglican and Protestant posters rather quickly disproves this.

that shot was aimed at me because NHA gets run out of the CDT on the reg: mainly for bringing up half baked, wildly erroneous and easily disprovable ideas about theology.

Actually, no, something has been done about it: Other people have been punished for telling him to knock it off.

Also, if you read the posts before Santheres' ruling, you can see him flaming other people, but for some reason that wasn't dealt with.

[Punished UMN]

He's been told 1/2 a dozen times now to stop interacting with me and yet he still keeps baiting/flaming on a weekly basis and nothing has been done about it:

that shot was aimed at me because NHA gets run out of the CDT on the reg: mainly for bringing up half baked, wildly erroneous and easily disprovable ideas about theology.

Actually, no, something has been done about it: Other people have been punished for telling him to knock it off.

Also, if you read the posts before Santheres' ruling, you can see him flaming other people, but for some reason that wasn't dealt with.

You were doing plenty of baiting of your own:

There is a consequence; destroying a human life that they conceived just for fun. That's the point. Discarding an innocent human life just to enable hedonism is dystopian, and the fact you don't get that is even more dystopian.

There's nothing worth preserving in hookup culture.

We get it, you hate women and like watching them suffer.

You don't have to spam this fact 10,000 times a day.

That would certainly be easier for you to believe.

Everyone here thinks you do.

Such a childish retort. Literally playground material.

You could actually question why it is everyone thinks you hate women, but that's not going to happen.

And you know why that's not going to happen. Because then it'll out you and you can't have that happen.

Like, in your very post that lead to this you outright admitted abortion should be illegal in order to punish women, and yet you view nothing misogynistic about that.

I'm well aware of why you think that.

And I didn't say anything of the sort. Constantly lying will do you no favors.

Lying is a sin Salus/

Evidently women having rights over their own bodies is dystopian to you:

There is a consequence; destroying a human life that they conceived just for fun. That's the point. Discarding an innocent human life just to enable hedonism is dystopian, and the fact you don't get that is even more dystopian.

There's nothing worth preserving in hookup culture.

You're so against women have rights that you consider a world where they do have them as dystopian.

[New haven america]

^UMN does it to, he's been told to just ignore me and here he is once again, oh, and has admitted to stalking people in another report I made that was then quickly ignored.

Someone who's barely posted in weeks (Last period of regular posting being mid-February, as can be seen with a cursory glance of his post history) suddenly pops up to try and get someone else in trouble over something that's not even against the rules as can be seen by other players doing the exact same thing, some as recent as last night. How do you explain this if it's not stalking? It's to the point of predictability.

Side note: Calling out Salus' misogyny is like calling out Sai's Nazism.

[Punished UMN]

^UMN does it to, and has admitted to stalking people in another report I made that was then quickly ignored. (Someone who's barely posted in weeks pops up to try and get me trouble over something that's not against the rules. How do you explain this?)

Side note: Calling out Salus' misogyny is like calling out Sai's Nazism.

I recall the mods overturning the report you made against me (which was a report I made of a post you literally made in reply to me, twice), because it didn't say anything about stalking you, but about reporting you because you're a bad faith poster. I have no interest in continuing to entertain this paranoid persecution fantasy you made up because nearly everything you post is a lie.

The post is in the most active thread on the site, and one I posted in four times in the last 24 hours (examples here: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=516580&p=39584001#p39584001 viewtopic.php?f=20&t=516580&p=39587894#p39587894 ) , so there's plenty of logical explanations

[New haven america]

Bump

[New haven america]

48 hour bump

Not leaving the front page until this gets a ruling.

[New haven america]

72 hour bump

[New haven america]

96 hour bump

[Sedgistan]

At this point you can conclude that none of the posts violate the rules, but that your repeated bump spamming will get you a warning for spamming if continued.

Your report of the first post suggests you need to grow a thicker skin; the subsequent posts of yours that were reported suggest you need to consider your own conduct before reporting others.

[New haven america]

1. At this point you can conclude that none of the posts violate the rules, 2. but that your repeated bump spamming will get you a warning for spamming if continued.

Your report of the first post suggests you need to grow a thicker skin; the subsequent posts of yours that were reported suggest you need to consider your own conduct before reporting others.

1. How? Last I checked baiting was against the rules.
2. So reading from this, a minor inconvenience is considered more serious than multiple years of harassment and rule breaking that's to the point where other users are noticing. Interesting.

Thank you~ Hope you have a lovely weekend.

[Necroghastia]

not only am i not the cookware, your shitty authoritarian party's doing what i literally said it has done

"Your shitty authoritarian party" Says the guy advocating murder and totalitarian rule.

You'd be funny, if only you could tone down the irony a tad.

Telconi claiming someone is "advocating murder" seems pretty close to bait/trollnaming.

[Luna Amore]

"Your shitty authoritarian party" Says the guy advocating murder and totalitarian rule.

You'd be funny, if only you could tone down the irony a tad.

Telconi claiming someone is "advocating murder" seems pretty close to bait/trollnaming.

It's definitely not trollnaming.

From context, it looks to be about Roe v Wade. The pro-life side of that argument traditionally views it as a child from conception. By definition, from a pro-life perspective, pro-choice is advocating murder.

It's a point to be argued against not moderated. Not actionable.