Well, I'm guessing the initial opposition is likely defender-aligned but I could be wrong.
Regardless, thanks for the answer.
Advertisement
by Dawn Denac » Tue Mar 15, 2022 4:21 pm
by Apatosaurus » Tue Mar 15, 2022 4:54 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Fachumonn wrote:Oh great, back to being snarky after being defeated. It's the only thing you know how to do.
I wasn't defeated. I simply don't want to get warned for spamming by continuing to yell at someone who closes their eyes and plugs their ears. As for your opinion of me? I am pretty sure you know exactly where it will be filed, so don't waste the keystrokes.....
by Fachumonn » Tue Mar 15, 2022 5:12 pm
Tetchuan wrote:Agree in principal, disagree in execution.
We recognize raiders as a threat to peace and stability but oppose this legislation on the vagueness of its approach and uncertainty of effectiveness.
by Underwater Sovereignties » Tue Mar 15, 2022 5:46 pm
by Tetchuan » Tue Mar 15, 2022 6:49 pm
Fachumonn wrote:Tetchuan wrote:Agree in principal, disagree in execution.
We recognize raiders as a threat to peace and stability but oppose this legislation on the vagueness of its approach and uncertainty of effectiveness.
What you're not realizing is that the proposal in question here was wrote by long time-raider for The Black Hawks, and is basically just looking for a self-recognition here.
by Council of Minuscule and Small Regions » Tue Mar 15, 2022 10:07 pm
by Madjack » Wed Mar 16, 2022 2:40 am
Tetchuan wrote:Agree in principal, disagree in execution.
We recognize raiders as a threat to peace and stability but oppose this legislation on the vagueness of its approach and uncertainty of effectiveness.
by Professor Albus Dumbledore » Wed Mar 16, 2022 5:22 am
Wayneactia wrote:Fachumonn wrote:Oh great, back to being snarky after being defeated. It's the only thing you know how to do.
I wasn't defeated. I simply don't want to get warned for spamming by continuing to yell at someone who closes their eyes and plugs their ears. As for your opinion of me? I am pretty sure you know exactly where it will be filed, so don't waste the keystrokes.....
by Partnership for Sovereignty » Wed Mar 16, 2022 6:25 am
In terms of declarations that aim to recognize a world-wide threat, it is necessary to recommend a course of action for the world to diminish or eradicate said threat following its identification for the declaration to be of value. Yet, “On Raider Unity” fails to propose any actions to effectively combat Raider Unity, nor does it even encourage regions to find a way to tackle this issue. It therefore remains incomplete in its apparent mission to guide the world in combating Raider Unity and necessitates further drafting. Another point of contention is the author’s identity as a raider who strongly benefits from and promotes Raider Unity as a high official of the Black Hawks, a notable raider region. It simply does not make sense to allow someone who benefits from the existence and growth of a threat to dictate how exactly the world should view the said danger. To allow this resolution to pass would therefore mean allowing a resolution that is inherently biased by a raider perspective to define a threat whose very existence is encouraged by raiders. Read More...
by Fachumonn » Wed Mar 16, 2022 7:21 am
Team Leo wrote:This is the most shitty ass proposal I've ever seen anyways
by Dawn Denac » Wed Mar 16, 2022 11:01 am
Team Leo wrote:This is the most shitty ass proposal I've ever seen anyways
by Madjack » Wed Mar 16, 2022 11:22 am
by Dawn Denac » Wed Mar 16, 2022 11:33 am
by WayNeacTia » Wed Mar 16, 2022 12:47 pm
Professor Albus Dumbledore wrote:Wayneactia wrote:I wasn't defeated. I simply don't want to get warned for spamming by continuing to yell at someone who closes their eyes and plugs their ears. As for your opinion of me? I am pretty sure you know exactly where it will be filed, so don't waste the keystrokes.....
Bruh raiders terrorized my regions and i need my revenge. People would rather listen to somebody who wrote 5 SC proposals rather then the guy who wrote NO SC props and submitted no SC Props in your life. So listen to the defedner now Wayne.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Mar 16, 2022 1:00 pm
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Professor Albus Dumbledore » Wed Mar 16, 2022 1:33 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Professor Albus Dumbledore wrote:Bruh raiders terrorized my regions and i need my revenge. People would rather listen to somebody who wrote 5 SC proposals rather then the guy who wrote NO SC props and submitted no SC Props in your life. So listen to the defedner now Wayne.
Once again, maybe you should read: viewtopic.php?p=39445812#p39445812
by WayNeacTia » Wed Mar 16, 2022 1:54 pm
Professor Albus Dumbledore wrote:Wayneactia wrote:Once again, maybe you should read: viewtopic.php?p=39445812#p39445812
For what?Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:What a surprise! And in terms of shit proposals I think your SECfanatics attempt would take the prize.
ACtually it was a beautifully made prop, even you couldn't find a lot of criticism for it. It's better then any proposal you could write.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Farnhamia » Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:05 pm
by Platoon of Peace » Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:12 pm
Farnhamia wrote:*looms ominously*
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement