Giovanniland wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:The WA shouldn't commend non-compilers. Compliance isn't determined by policies.
Are we really judging who gets to be recognized by the SC, which is an entirely different chamber than the GA, by this non-compliance nonsense again? People are free to vote with that criteria if they want, but please don't try imposing this view on others as you are trying to do. In my opinion it should not matter if none of the commendation is about GA contributions.
Well the SC did pass Resolution #359, Recognition of the General Assembly, so non-compliance with a GA resolution, according to that, should have consequences.
(A reason why I voted against it when it came to vote.)