Advertisement
by Yaak » Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:36 pm
by Americantia » Wed Oct 20, 2021 4:27 pm
by Corvetteland » Fri Oct 22, 2021 12:45 pm
I support you. I think we should have something to do with guns and drugs. They do a big impact in the safety of our countries.Araraukar wrote:Perhaps as good as ideas for things would be ideas on what not to try, at least as your first proposal. My suggestions for that category are "any repeals" and "anything to do with guns or drugs".
EDIT: What if someone submits a topic that a regular has had a draft on for ages, or already has a drafting thread for (but it just currently happens to be on page 78 or something of the forum)? Also, telling people not to post drafts on a subject just because they've been around here for ages sounds... well, counterintuitive, if the point is to get activity here.
by Bears Armed » Fri Oct 22, 2021 2:32 pm
And decisions about them can be made at the national level: Many of the WA's member nations will oppose international legislation on these topics on general principles, no matter which side of the debates on those topics they favour.Corvetteland wrote:I think we should have something to do with guns and drugs. They do a big impact in the safety of our countries.
5. Assures member nations of the exclusive right to determine purely internal arms trading and firearm policy, excepting:
a. those regulations recognized by the terms of this resolution or extant international law,
b. future regulations which seek to prevent firearms from being sold to or used by individuals that pose a danger of performing imminent lawless action, or
c. future resolutions which seek to relax regulations on purchasing firearms for recreational reasons only;
by Yaak » Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:45 pm
by Bears Armed » Tue Oct 26, 2021 2:18 pm
Yaak wrote:Is it legal to make a resolution ban math homework?
by Untecna » Tue Oct 26, 2021 2:20 pm
Bears Armed wrote:Yaak wrote:Is it legal to make a resolution ban math homework?
It might be legal, or -- perhaps more probably -- it might be considered a breach of the rule against joke proposals. That would depend on how well it was written, and how many GenSec members were willing to accept its legality.
Getting it to quorum, let alone passed, would be even trickier.
by Yaak » Tue Oct 26, 2021 5:53 pm
Bears Armed wrote:Yaak wrote:Is it legal to make a resolution ban math homework?
It might be legal, or -- perhaps more probably -- it might be considered a breach of the rule against joke proposals. That would depend on how well it was written, and how many GenSec members were willing to accept its legality.
Getting it to quorum, let alone passed, would be even trickier.
by Outer Sparta » Wed Oct 27, 2021 6:47 pm
Yaak wrote:Bears Armed wrote:It might be legal, or -- perhaps more probably -- it might be considered a breach of the rule against joke proposals. That would depend on how well it was written, and how many GenSec members were willing to accept its legality.
Getting it to quorum, let alone passed, would be even trickier.
Can you teach me how to get it on the voting board, or at least make it legal?
by Yaak » Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:22 pm
Outer Sparta wrote:Yaak wrote:
Can you teach me how to get it on the voting board, or at least make it legal?
Read this guide: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=159348
This will answer most of your questions regarding the rules and procedures.
by WayNeacTia » Sat Oct 30, 2021 12:44 am
Yaak wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:Read this guide: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=159348
This will answer most of your questions regarding the rules and procedures.
1. Too late. I decided to move it to SC.
2. I read it 100 times. I'm basically asking for a co-author.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Terra Animo » Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:45 pm
by Bears Armed » Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:57 pm
Terra Animo wrote:I am considering writing a proposal on railway standard unification. I have looked at the two drafts regarding the issue which have come up previously and believe I could write a draft which fixes the issues people took with them. My only worry is that anything regarding the standardization of railways will be "covered" by WA #34, however the document seems to be centered around safety, while mine would be centered on unification, as well as more specific standards regarding railways. I know I cannot reference other WA approved laws, but could I insert a clause somewhere in there that went something like, in more scholarly wording of course, "ample safety measures shall also be taken to comply with an past or future WA legislation," and be good? Looking forward to a response!
by Republic of Sernia » Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:05 pm
by Untecna » Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:40 pm
Republic of Sernia wrote:Hey! I was thinking about writing a proposal about slowing down inflation of currencies by bringing all mints (or whatever you call places that make money) under WA control so they can moderate production of money and slow down inflation.
I was just wondering if there were any problems with it, and if not, which category it would fall into.
by Republic of Sernia » Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:45 pm
Untecna wrote:Republic of Sernia wrote:Hey! I was thinking about writing a proposal about slowing down inflation of currencies by bringing all mints (or whatever you call places that make money) under WA control so they can moderate production of money and slow down inflation.
I was just wondering if there were any problems with it, and if not, which category it would fall into.
That would be extremely illegal. Most likely due to GA#17, as well as other previous resolutions.
Edit: Not GA#17, since that deals with funding the WA. Still, this idea is extremely illegal.
by Terra Animo » Tue Nov 09, 2021 2:05 pm
by Tinhampton » Tue Nov 09, 2021 2:08 pm
Terra Animo wrote:Is this legal?
TA wrote:Has it been done?
by Untecna » Tue Nov 09, 2021 2:21 pm
Terra Animo wrote:I am considering writing a proposal regulating the conversion of currencies. Some of the regulations would include creating an organization to set worldwide conversion rates, as well as overseeing the conversions to ensure they are not overly taxed and things. Is this legal? Has it been done?
by Imperium Anglorum » Wed Nov 10, 2021 9:17 am
Untecna wrote:Terra Animo wrote:I am considering writing a proposal regulating the conversion of currencies. Some of the regulations would include creating an organization to set worldwide conversion rates, as well as overseeing the conversions to ensure they are not overly taxed and things. Is this legal? Has it been done?
The GA can't interfere in a nation's taxation so... the regulation of taxation during the conversion of currencies is not legal. I am not sure about regulating currency conversion, so that part is ambiguous. I would say to draft it and see what the Secretariats or IA say.
by Jaxino » Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:51 pm
by Untecna » Fri Nov 12, 2021 2:21 pm
Jaxino wrote:We make a different kind of YouTube called NationTube
by Outer Sparta » Sun Nov 14, 2021 9:55 am
AJ Empire wrote:I suggest to make an arms regulations act which would decrease all military budgets by 20 to 25%, would decrease arms manufacturing by 10% or would just ban WMDs and conscription.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Barfleur, Imperium Anglorum, The Ice States
Advertisement