Thank you.... my liver and I appreciate it.
Advertisement
by Katganistan » Fri Oct 22, 2021 6:31 pm
by The Kingdom of the Three Isles » Fri Oct 22, 2021 7:15 pm
Those who say they are based aren’t based. Those who say they are humble ain’t humble. Those who say they are chads ain’t chads.Ordo Theutonicorum wrote: they have a cross-pattee on their flag??
by The Caleshan Valkyrie » Fri Oct 22, 2021 8:24 pm
by Grave_n_idle » Fri Oct 22, 2021 8:27 pm
The Kingdom Of The Three Isles wrote:Thepeopl wrote:
So if you follow only old testament, disabled ppl aren't submitted to heaven. Aren't allowed to worship.
Jesus contradicts this in new testament.
I agree. If you are a Christian, you would mainly follow New Testament teachings, as Jesus is the centre of the religion. The Old Testament only speaks of a Messiah, not exactly Jesus’ teachings.
by The Kingdom of the Three Isles » Fri Oct 22, 2021 8:56 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:The Kingdom Of The Three Isles wrote:I agree. If you are a Christian, you would mainly follow New Testament teachings, as Jesus is the centre of the religion. The Old Testament only speaks of a Messiah, not exactly Jesus’ teachings.
Self-mutilation being the aspirational ideal is new testament
Those who say they are based aren’t based. Those who say they are humble ain’t humble. Those who say they are chads ain’t chads.Ordo Theutonicorum wrote: they have a cross-pattee on their flag??
by The Kingdom of the Three Isles » Fri Oct 22, 2021 8:57 pm
Those who say they are based aren’t based. Those who say they are humble ain’t humble. Those who say they are chads ain’t chads.Ordo Theutonicorum wrote: they have a cross-pattee on their flag??
by Betoni » Fri Oct 22, 2021 11:55 pm
'The New California Republic wrote:Betoni wrote:Banning abortion isn't the same as giving rights to a fetus.
It is, it's de facto giving the fetus the right to use the body of another against their will. That's a right that no other person has.Betoni wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong on this, but the fetus doesn't have any legal bearing, it is not a legal entity.
Given the pro-life crowd very frequently want the fetus to be considered a person, the question of it being a legal entity in this context is very pertinent, hence why we need to speak in terms like this.
by The New California Republic » Sat Oct 23, 2021 2:40 am
Betoni wrote:'The New California Republic wrote:It is, it's de facto giving the fetus the right to use the body of another against their will. That's a right that no other person has.
Given the pro-life crowd very frequently want the fetus to be considered a person, the question of it being a legal entity in this context is very pertinent, hence why we need to speak in terms like this.
It really isn't, the fetus has no capacity to act in any sense much less legal, so it cannot use anything or have any rights. Laws banning abortion don't create new rights for fetuses they limit the rights of the mother. Have you then conceded already that a fetus is capable of having rights?
Given the pro-life crowd very frequently want the fetus to be considered a person, the question of it being a legal entity in this context is very pertinent, hence why we need to speak in terms like this.
by Grave_n_idle » Sat Oct 23, 2021 4:49 am
by Isles of Eamhna » Sat Oct 23, 2021 11:02 am
by Vassenor » Sat Oct 23, 2021 11:10 am
Isles of Eamhna wrote:has the pro-life crowd considered the possibility of reducing the overall prevalence of abortion by mandating vasectomies for men? modern vasectomy surgery (and vasectomy reversal surgery) is a generally safe procedure with low chance of complications that almost entirely removes the possibility of a man causing an unplanned or unwanted pregnancy.
by Grave_n_idle » Sat Oct 23, 2021 11:23 am
by Esternial » Sat Oct 23, 2021 1:33 pm
Isles of Eamhna wrote:has the pro-life crowd considered the possibility of reducing the overall prevalence of abortion by mandating vasectomies for men? modern vasectomy surgery (and vasectomy reversal surgery) is a generally safe procedure with low chance of complications that almost entirely removes the possibility of a man causing an unplanned or unwanted pregnancy.
by Neutraligon » Sat Oct 23, 2021 1:36 pm
Isles of Eamhna wrote:has the pro-life crowd considered the possibility of reducing the overall prevalence of abortion by mandating vasectomies for men? modern vasectomy surgery (and vasectomy reversal surgery) is a generally safe procedure with low chance of complications that almost entirely removes the possibility of a man causing an unplanned or unwanted pregnancy.
by Sundiata » Sat Oct 23, 2021 1:59 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Dogmeat wrote:It's no use Grave. Even if you were to give them 99 reasons why they're doing religion wrong. They would just respond by ignoring you, and killing a million Germans.
I'm fine with Sun 'doing it wrong', I'm picking up his religious anti-abortion arguments (or in this case, religious hijack) and explaining where they are wrong for the benefit of others.
by Stellar Colonies » Sat Oct 23, 2021 2:10 pm
Isles of Eamhna wrote:has the pro-life crowd considered the possibility of reducing the overall prevalence of abortion by mandating vasectomies for men? modern vasectomy surgery (and vasectomy reversal surgery) is a generally safe procedure with low chance of complications that almost entirely removes the possibility of a man causing an unplanned or unwanted pregnancy.
Floofybit wrote:Your desired society should be one where you are submissive and controlled
Primitive Communism wrote:What bodily autonomy do men need?
Techocracy101010 wrote:If she goes on a rampage those saggy wonders are as deadly as nunchucks
Parmistan wrote:It's not ALWAYS acceptable when we do it, but it's MORE acceptable when we do it.
Theodorable wrote:Jihad will win.
Distruzio wrote:All marriage outside the Church is gay marriage.
Khardsland wrote:Terrorism in its original definition is a good thing.
I try to be objective, but I do have some biases.
North Californian.
Stellar Colonies is a loose galactic confederacy.
The Confederacy & the WA.
Add 1200 years.
by Ifreann » Sat Oct 23, 2021 2:51 pm
by The Kingdom of the Three Isles » Sat Oct 23, 2021 2:53 pm
Those who say they are based aren’t based. Those who say they are humble ain’t humble. Those who say they are chads ain’t chads.Ordo Theutonicorum wrote: they have a cross-pattee on their flag??
by The Kingdom of the Three Isles » Sat Oct 23, 2021 2:54 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Dogmeat wrote:It's no use Grave. Even if you were to give them 99 reasons why they're doing religion wrong. They would just respond by ignoring you, and killing a million Germans.
I'm fine with Sun 'doing it wrong', I'm picking up his religious anti-abortion arguments (or in this case, religious hijack) and explaining where they are wrong for the benefit of others.
Those who say they are based aren’t based. Those who say they are humble ain’t humble. Those who say they are chads ain’t chads.Ordo Theutonicorum wrote: they have a cross-pattee on their flag??
by Ifreann » Sat Oct 23, 2021 2:54 pm
The Kingdom Of The Three Isles wrote:Dogmeat wrote:It's no use Grave. Even if you were to give them 99 reasons why they're doing religion wrong. They would just respond by ignoring you, and killing a million Germans.
Ok what? I’m simply following my religion, not your cult. Now be quiet. And no, I don’t massacre Germans lol.
by The Kingdom of the Three Isles » Sat Oct 23, 2021 2:55 pm
Ifreann wrote:The Kingdom Of The Three Isles wrote:Ok what? I’m simply following my religion, not your cult. Now be quiet. And no, I don’t massacre Germans lol.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninety-five_Theses
Those who say they are based aren’t based. Those who say they are humble ain’t humble. Those who say they are chads ain’t chads.Ordo Theutonicorum wrote: they have a cross-pattee on their flag??
by The New California Republic » Sat Oct 23, 2021 2:56 pm
The Kingdom Of The Three Isles wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
I'm fine with Sun 'doing it wrong', I'm picking up his religious anti-abortion arguments (or in this case, religious hijack) and explaining where they are wrong for the benefit of others.
Did you just assume that I was pro life? Man, can someone prove them wrong because they won’t believe me. Neutraligon you tell em.
by The Kingdom of the Three Isles » Sat Oct 23, 2021 2:57 pm
The New California Republic wrote:The Kingdom Of The Three Isles wrote:Did you just assume that I was pro life? Man, can someone prove them wrong because they won’t believe me. Neutraligon you tell em.
Nobody even mentioned you in that post...
Those who say they are based aren’t based. Those who say they are humble ain’t humble. Those who say they are chads ain’t chads.Ordo Theutonicorum wrote: they have a cross-pattee on their flag??
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Duvniask, Elejamie, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Kannap, Kaumudeen, Kerwa, Kreushia, Three Galaxies, Uiiop, Uvolla, Valrifall
Advertisement