by Dungtoper » Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:13 am
by Polomon Islands » Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:26 am
by Dungtoper » Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:51 am
by Outer Sparta » Thu Oct 14, 2021 11:40 am
CONVINCED That there is No evidence to the "pursuit targets" and that the Death penalty does not Target the Mentally ill (Except the Deranged that are a Threat.) and the Author of the Proposal is "Believing" These are True. Although these types of People like the Mentally ill Should never earn a death Penalty but go to a Rehab Center Instead.
by Outer Sparta » Thu Oct 14, 2021 12:25 pm
Dungtoper wrote:So how Do I improve this?
by Outer Sparta » Thu Oct 14, 2021 12:28 pm
Dungtoper wrote:Can you give me a link to the rules and Tell me what Grammatical Eyesore is? Thanks in advance.
by Apatosaurus » Thu Oct 14, 2021 1:29 pm
by WayNeacTia » Thu Oct 14, 2021 2:03 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Godular » Thu Oct 14, 2021 2:22 pm
by Dungtoper » Thu Oct 14, 2021 2:24 pm
Godular wrote:“Sooooo what I’m seeing here is a repeal proposition predicated on the argument of ‘Nuh-uh!’. While we’re not philosophically opposed to the death penalty, we cannot support this repeal.”
by Godular » Thu Oct 14, 2021 2:48 pm
Dungtoper wrote:Godular wrote:“Sooooo what I’m seeing here is a repeal proposition predicated on the argument of ‘Nuh-uh!’. While we’re not philosophically opposed to the death penalty, we cannot support this repeal.”
Anyways, I wanted to Repeal it because we cant let the Criminals who did the worst of crimes just go to jail!
We need to bring justice to all who have been affected by these people!
by WayNeacTia » Thu Oct 14, 2021 3:07 pm
Dungtoper wrote:Im saying how is it now, Any changes or we good?
Dungtoper wrote:Godular wrote:“Sooooo what I’m seeing here is a repeal proposition predicated on the argument of ‘Nuh-uh!’. While we’re not philosophically opposed to the death penalty, we cannot support this repeal.”
Anyways, I wanted to Repeal it because we cant let the Criminals who did the worst of crimes just go to jail!
We need to bring justice to all who have been affected by these people!
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Sierra Lyricalia » Thu Oct 14, 2021 3:13 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Seeing as you asked so nicely, no..... Your proposal isn't good to go, because it is shit. This is the third attempt you have shotgunned out, and not wanting to be left out, it is chock full of illegalities as well. I suggest you READ. Now as for the rush, if you want to be accused of badge hunting, then keep it up. You aren't the first to come bursting in here thinking you are just going to start repealing shit, nor will you be the last.
by Godular » Thu Oct 14, 2021 3:15 pm
Dungtoper wrote:Yes I do think it's perfect!
by Outer Sparta » Thu Oct 14, 2021 3:21 pm
Dungtoper wrote:Yes I do think it's perfect!
by WayNeacTia » Thu Oct 14, 2021 3:27 pm
Sierra Lyricalia wrote:Wayneactia wrote:Seeing as you asked so nicely, no..... Your proposal isn't good to go, because it is shit. This is the third attempt you have shotgunned out, and not wanting to be left out, it is chock full of illegalities as well. I suggest you READ. Now as for the rush, if you want to be accused of badge hunting, then keep it up. You aren't the first to come bursting in here thinking you are just going to start repealing shit, nor will you be the last.
Ya know, this could have been phrased a bit less nastily. The proposal is not legal nor particularly likely to pass, but those aren't reasons to be so spectacularly rude.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Dungtoper » Thu Oct 14, 2021 3:36 pm
by The Kingdom of the Three Isles » Thu Oct 14, 2021 4:54 pm
Those who say they are based aren’t based. Those who say they are humble ain’t humble. Those who say they are chads ain’t chads.Ordo Theutonicorum wrote: they have a cross-pattee on their flag??
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: South Newlandia
Advertisement