Advertisement
by Serrus » Mon Sep 27, 2021 11:09 am
Eastern Raarothorgren wrote:News websites are good and reasonable soruces of information or they would not be on the internet if they were saying things that were incorrect.
Keshiland wrote:I am yes arguing that the 1st 4 are not binding to the states and yes I know that in most Republican states they would ban the freedom of religion and the freedom of essembally but I don't live there and I hate guns!
by ShrewLlamaLand » Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:24 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Updated the OP with the following under Frontier -> Stronghold: "If the Delegate position changes hands during this process, then an additional 3 days are added to the transition time period." This is there to prevent last-minute snipes that cannot be countered.
by Sedgistan » Tue Sep 28, 2021 4:40 am
by Nyxonia » Mon Oct 04, 2021 12:03 am
by Bears Armed » Mon Oct 04, 2021 8:06 am
Nyxonia wrote:For name changes how about;
Confederation; a more or less permanent union of countries with some or most political power vested in a central authority. (more democratic)
Empire; a sovereign state made up of several territories and peoples subject to a single ruling authority, often an emperor. (more autocratic)
by Haganham » Tue Oct 05, 2021 12:48 am
by Sedgistan » Tue Oct 05, 2021 1:31 am
by Kepler-0085 » Tue Oct 05, 2021 7:04 am
Bears Armed wrote:Kepler-0085 wrote:We should have a third option to stay as we are now, it could be the default one and named the "Camp" Like a mix between Frontier and Stronghold
That was considered originally, but was dropped as the rules for the currently-planned two types were developed. 'Stronghold' basically gives us/you everything that "as we now are" does, plus the possibility of Founder's appointing successors, so what advantage would your suggested third option have over that?
And you might want to check all the definitions of the word ''Camp'...
by All Wild Things » Mon Oct 11, 2021 4:01 pm
by Lord Dominator » Mon Oct 11, 2021 8:19 pm
All Wild Things wrote:I may have overlooked the answer, but if a founder of a stronghold gets mod-deleted, would succession still kick in?
by Old Hope » Tue Oct 12, 2021 2:56 am
Sedgistan wrote:As per my last substantial post what's set out in the OP is settled, which is why this has progressed to the next step (internal discussion, then will go on admin's to-code list).
I remain open to an alternative name for Preserve/Preservation resolutions, but there hasn't been a solid alternative suggested yet.
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.
by The Hinterplace » Wed Oct 13, 2021 7:58 pm
by Klaus Devestatorie » Thu Oct 14, 2021 6:43 am
Sedgistan wrote:As per my last substantial post what's set out in the OP is settled, which is why this has progressed to the next step (internal discussion, then will go on admin's to-code list).
by Sedgistan » Thu Oct 14, 2021 7:21 am
by Thousand Branches » Thu Oct 14, 2021 7:57 am
by Unibot III » Thu Oct 14, 2021 8:00 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Fhaengshia » Thu Oct 14, 2021 8:03 am
by Sailiopia » Thu Oct 14, 2021 8:22 am
by Porflox » Thu Oct 14, 2021 10:51 am
by Lord Dominator » Thu Oct 14, 2021 1:53 pm
by Comfed » Thu Oct 14, 2021 2:28 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: The Second Psutasia
Advertisement