TLDR - My issue is almost entirely with the resolution, rather than the nominee.
The Security Council,
Unconvinced that the contributions of Suvmia to The Ascendancy Federation (TAF) and The United Ascendancy (TUA) are commendable given neither region grew to more than 100 nations;
Strongly disagreeing that building a region to “just under 100” nations is a commendable achievement;
Alarmed that SC#368 mentions Suvmia’s role as TUA’s Minister of Foreign Affairs in 2019-2020, a period during which several diplomatic connections were held with problematic and dangerous regions;
Frustrated that SCR368’s Noting clause fails to expand on how Suvmia’s contributions to TAF and TUA have “[continued] to benefit other regions and the world as a whole”;
Disheartened by the resolution’s vagueness and profound lack of detail regarding how Suvmia’s “guidance in assisting new nations navigate the international political sphere” was manifested;
Doubtful that Suvmia’s humility, though admirable, is worthy of a Security Council Commendation particularly given apparent deceit on the part of Suvmia to ensure of the passage of SC#352: Commend Ellenburg;
Dismayed by the writing of SC#368, frequently containing unnecessarily long and clumsily-worded clauses such as the Highlighting, Lauding and Astonished clauses;
Conceding that Suvmia’s contributions to their regions could be grounds for a commendation from the Security Council, but skeptical that SC#368 adequately justifies said commendation;
Hereby Repeals Security Council Resolution #368 "Commend Suvmia".