Advertisement
by Chess Reloaded » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:02 am
by Comerciante » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:04 am
Bears Armed wrote:The Alma Mater wrote:and the only one to use nukes on a civlian population
4.) An invasion of Japan itself that it was estimated would, if the Japanese fought as fiercely as both sides expected, result in: around a million Allied troops KIA (including all of those POWs being used for hard labour there, who would have been massacred by their captors) , and many more maimed for life; the death of almost all Japanese military personnel within the 'home islands'; and death or maiming for far more Japanese civilians than the atomic bombs affected... Did you know that the Japanese government & military intended to use as many civilians as they could (ordered in the Emperor's "holy" name) as suicide bombers, or just instruct them all to attack the invaders with whatever implements were at hand, which would probably have triggered a "Kill them all, it's the only way to be sure" in many of the Allied troops?
by Northern Socialist Council Republics » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:15 am
Bears Armed wrote:-snip-
by Sattwikstan » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:16 am
Comerciante wrote:Bears Armed wrote:4.) An invasion of Japan itself that it was estimated would, if the Japanese fought as fiercely as both sides expected, result in: around a million Allied troops KIA (including all of those POWs being used for hard labour there, who would have been massacred by their captors) , and many more maimed for life; the death of almost all Japanese military personnel within the 'home islands'; and death or maiming for far more Japanese civilians than the atomic bombs affected... Did you know that the Japanese government & military intended to use as many civilians as they could (ordered in the Emperor's "holy" name) as suicide bombers, or just instruct them all to attack the invaders with whatever implements were at hand, which would probably have triggered a "Kill them all, it's the only way to be sure" in many of the Allied troops?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the study that provided the "million Allied troops KIA" was performed years after the war and was used merely to create justifications for the bombings.
by Chess Reloaded » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:23 am
by Saiwania » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:23 am
Jeriga wrote:It's within your right, but don't expect respect or anything less than a hostile tone from most reasonable people.
by Chess Reloaded » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:27 am
Saiwania wrote:Jeriga wrote:It's within your right, but don't expect respect or anything less than a hostile tone from most reasonable people.
No, I think I will expect better, particularly when I'm not as hostile in kind. I'd advise other users to get over it. I'm here to stay and I've outlasted most who were opposed to me. I intend to triumph in my own way.
https://news.yahoo.com/taliban-spokesma ... 51060.html
Taliban official who couldn't be found by US and former Afghan government, reveals that he was living in Kabul the whole time.
It is perhaps the case that Ayman al-Zawahiri for example, is in Pakistan or some other well known city in the middle east that everybody least expects them to be.
by Ethel mermania » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:41 am
Comerciante wrote:Bears Armed wrote:4.) An invasion of Japan itself that it was estimated would, if the Japanese fought as fiercely as both sides expected, result in: around a million Allied troops KIA (including all of those POWs being used for hard labour there, who would have been massacred by their captors) , and many more maimed for life; the death of almost all Japanese military personnel within the 'home islands'; and death or maiming for far more Japanese civilians than the atomic bombs affected... Did you know that the Japanese government & military intended to use as many civilians as they could (ordered in the Emperor's "holy" name) as suicide bombers, or just instruct them all to attack the invaders with whatever implements were at hand, which would probably have triggered a "Kill them all, it's the only way to be sure" in many of the Allied troops?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the study that provided the "million Allied troops KIA" was performed years after the war and was used merely to create justifications for the bombings.
by Dumb Ideologies » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:42 am
Chess Reloaded wrote:Why is the UK considering criminalizing travel to Afghanistan when many, many fundamentalists are trying to move there from the west and facilitating that would be a relatively simple way to remove them from Europe?
by Picairn » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:44 am
Chess Reloaded wrote:Ron Paul has long been a favorite of Islamists (clips of him are actually featured in an Islamist documentary which asserts many wars in the Middle East are a product of collaboration between the House of Saud abd America regarding the Petrodollar), now I know why.
https://twitter.com/Moazzam_Begg/status ... 03714?s=19
by Ifreann » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:44 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Chess Reloaded wrote:Why is the UK considering criminalizing travel to Afghanistan when many, many fundamentalists are trying to move there from the west and facilitating that would be a relatively simple way to remove them from Europe?
I imagine the concern is that they will go there, receive training to conduct terror attacks or learn techniques for radicalisation and propaganda, before then going back to their previous countries to do naughty things.
by Dumb Ideologies » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:49 am
Ifreann wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:
I imagine the concern is that they will go there, receive training to conduct terror attacks or learn techniques for radicalisation and propaganda, before then going back to their previous countries to do naughty things.
You'd think that by now the terrorists would have implemented remote learning.
by Ethel mermania » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:53 am
Ifreann wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:
I imagine the concern is that they will go there, receive training to conduct terror attacks or learn techniques for radicalisation and propaganda, before then going back to their previous countries to do naughty things.
You'd think that by now the terrorists would have implemented remote learning.
by North Washington Republic » Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:58 am
Chess Reloaded wrote:Ron Paul has long been a favorite of Islamists (clips of him are actually featured in an Islamist documentary which asserts many wars in the Middle East are a product of collaboration between the House of Saud abd America regarding the Petrodollar), now I know why.
https://twitter.com/Moazzam_Begg/status ... 03714?s=19
by Chess Reloaded » Mon Sep 13, 2021 6:17 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Chess Reloaded wrote:Why is the UK considering criminalizing travel to Afghanistan when many, many fundamentalists are trying to move there from the west and facilitating that would be a relatively simple way to remove them from Europe?
I imagine the concern is that they will go there, receive training to conduct terror attacks or learn techniques for radicalisation and propaganda, before then going back to their previous countries to do naughty things.
by Insaanistan » Mon Sep 13, 2021 7:08 am
by Arvenia » Mon Sep 13, 2021 10:16 am
Insaanistan wrote:The situation in Mazar (from what we’re hearing) sounds like a Bollywood comedy that also wants to tackle world issues.
So like, Welcome to Karachi, but Afghan.
by Christian Confederation » Mon Sep 13, 2021 10:19 am
Based Move by the US Straight from the art of warChess Reloaded wrote:Any thoughts on the Convoy of Death?
by Insaanistan » Mon Sep 13, 2021 11:19 am
by Paddy O Fernature » Mon Sep 13, 2021 12:22 pm
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Sep 13, 2021 2:42 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Hidrandia, Philjia, Quincy, Spirit of Hope
Advertisement