This repeal is purely quality-based.
The Security Council,
Noting The Black Hawks (TBH) to be a Condemnable raider organization,
Hoping for a long list of sensible, well-written Security Council resolutions in the future,
Believing, however, that this is unachievable while SC#52 is an active resolution, for the following reasons:Disappointed that the standards for a condemnable raiding organization were once so low and that this proposal passed while treating "cooling" as plural, restating the title in the resolution to fluff it, using "concerned" and "noting" three times each because synonyms escaped the author, providing an argument against the proposal by mentioning how a vote for would get one's region attacked, and making up claims about targeting, permanently conquering, and threatening regions,
- SC#217 is a better-written resolution that condemns TBH for invading, delegate streak-breaking, espionage, and supporting coups, and leaves SC#52 unnecessary.
- Half of SC#52 focuses on something TBH in 2011 and prior didn't do.* More specifically, it talks about proposal raiding, a mild and commonly practiced (now as quorum raiding) form of raiding that merely bumps delegates voting on proposals temporarily, and one with a small effect on the chances of a proposal due to the limitations of what can be targeted. However, TBH didn't do such. Additionally, Condemns are often (and in this case, indeed) badges of honor to raiders, so the entire Concerned clause is irrelevant. Furthermore, "targeting" a region does not cool free speech, as the only senses of free speech in the SC are about discussing in the forums and writing proposals, which are completely unrelated to a region being targeted. Thus, TBH at the time of SC#52's passage did not "endanger the functioning and survival of the Security Council".
- The other half of SC#52 briefly discusses how TBH raids, or more specifically, "has targeted and raided hundreds of regions and used regional bans to exert their control," which is both uncondemnable and false. First, SC#52 doesn't define "targeted". Second, countless uncondemned regions have raided regions, some even more than what SC#52 mentions TBH doing as of its passing. Third, an overwhelming majority of regions have "used regional bans to exert their control," such as virtually every modern region. Fourth, if we condemned organizations for raiding a hundred regions, using the logic of SC#52, regions that defend a hundred regions would be commendable, when that is not the case. Fifth, the overwhelming majority of TBH's raids at the time were tag raids, which aren't permanent and don't use regional bans.
- Clause 4 of SC#52 is a nothing clause; it details an idea of somehow solo-commending a member of TBH, and an idea only, as it never reached quorum. Additionally, it uses "conspiring" which implies it being secret, yet it was public.
- Clause 2 mentions some weird and confusing language such as "surprisingly legal," "under-regulated," and "unsportsmanlike," seeming to refer to raiding as some exploit in the region system.
Hereby repeals: "Condemn The Black Hawks."
*to my knowledge (and to what New South Arctica has said at the time of the Condemn), there weren't any raids for the purpose of removing a delegate's vote on a proposal, (unless provoked?)