NATION

PASSWORD

[Draft] Springing into Action

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Yoyoyoyoyo
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Sep 03, 2020
Ex-Nation

[Draft] Springing into Action

Postby Yoyoyoyoyo » Sat Jul 31, 2021 7:48 pm

{Invalid for nations that do not subsidize businesses. Invalid for socialist nations. }

After news broke out that Boing, a major corporation that was heavily subsidized by the @@NAME@@ government, is on the brink of bankruptcy after heavily investing into bouncy runways, both men in black, men in suits, and men in pajamas have jumped into your office to discuss this explosive dilemma:

Choice 1: "Quite frankly, I do believe, truly believe, and let me tell you when I believe in something it has to be pretty darn believable because frankly I'm smart, so smart you can't even imagine and y'know people often come up to me to tell me how smart I am," says Donald Bezos, CEO of Boing, "and to be honest with you, and I'm being completely honest here, we need more money. You need to subsidize my business even more, after all we do so many things. So many things... People come up to me and say wow Mr. Bezos you do so many things. The people of @@NAME@@ wish to be a part of your company and you employ my grandma, my grandpa, my son, me, my daughter, my sister, my aunt, my brother, my..." his speech begins to muffle as you feel yourself slipping into a coma.

Effect 1: Bureaucratic double dealing makes Boing's profits hit the ceiling.


Choice 2: "HEY EVERYONE @@RANDOMNAME@@ FROM RICOCHET COURSE HERE BACK WITH ANOTHER VIDEO!!!!!" "TODAY WE WILL BE TALKING ABOUT THE TOP 10 THINGS THE GOVERNMENT IS DOING WRONG!!" @@HE@@ pauses his video recording. "Hey bro, you should really stop doing this whole artificially increasing economic activity thing. Stick with the free market and cut all of that corporate welfare completely while giving us all a well deserved tax break or something. Yeah the economy might crash or something but that's only in the short-term. Like in the long term, it will be more efficient and more importantly much more sustainable. @@RANDOMNAME@@ hesitantly turning the video back on, "NUMBER ONE, BUSINE..."

Effect 2: Startups are riskier to invest in than it is to invest into popular cryptocurrency Puppycoin.


Choice 3: Your mom quietly hops into your office. "Sweetie maybe you should just subsidize small businesses and businesses that are good for the environment instead of these unsustainable risk-taking corporations or something. That way we might be creating more jobs and saving the environment at the same time." She giggles suspiciously while taking a 100 @@CURRENCY@@ bill from your wallet and putting a plate of cookies and a glass of milk on your desk.

Effect 3: Clam Oil's popular defense that they are environmentally friendly is "I think therefore I am."


Choice 4: An old grumpy man wearing a heavy fur coat and mittens pops up from underneath your desk. Taking a shot of Brancalandian vodka he says, "Maybe you should nationalize all these big corporations. The top one percent will be abolished and small businesses would still be able to exist. Spare change?"

Effect 4: Mom and Pop shops that make 1 @@CURRENCY@@ more than the government limit become government property.


Choice 5: You begin to wonder if your mom slipped something to you when suddenly a puppy jumps from the ceiling of your office. "Why don't we just divert alllll of that business subsidization into all of your other government programs. That way we can spend less money on business and more on other things like defense, police, medicine, schools, welfare, or some other stuff if you want."

Effect 5: Fat cats are unusually underweight nowadays.
Last edited by Yoyoyoyoyo on Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:31 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13701
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Sat Jul 31, 2021 7:51 pm

Where are your effect lines? :P
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading The World by Simon Sebag Montefiore

User avatar
Yoyoyoyoyo
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Sep 03, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Yoyoyoyoyo » Sat Jul 31, 2021 7:58 pm

Tinhampton wrote:Where are your effect lines? :P

On it! Sorry!

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30747
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Sat Jul 31, 2021 11:16 pm

There are some fun bits in here, but I am not convinced that it holds together as a coherent whole.

Is this a dilemma that you could see confronting a real world national leader? Do all the options actually address the issue at hand? If you're Joe Biden or Justin Trudeau and someone tells you that a major corporation in your country is on the brink of bankruptcy, do you rethink your whole economic policy, or do you stay focused on that one corporation? I think you would stay more focused on that specific corporation, especially in a case like this where the corporation was mismanaged.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21479
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:13 am

"BOING", "bouncy runways"... Love it!
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Yoyoyoyoyo
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Sep 03, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Yoyoyoyoyo » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:28 am

USS Monitor wrote:There are some fun bits in here, but I am not convinced that it holds together as a coherent whole.

Is this a dilemma that you could see confronting a real world national leader? Do all the options actually address the issue at hand? If you're Joe Biden or Justin Trudeau and someone tells you that a major corporation in your country is on the brink of bankruptcy, do you rethink your whole economic policy, or do you stay focused on that one corporation? I think you would stay more focused on that specific corporation, especially in a case like this where the corporation was mismanaged.

Thank you!

User avatar
Yoyoyoyoyo
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Sep 03, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Yoyoyoyoyo » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:29 am

Bears Armed wrote:"BOING", "bouncy runways"... Love it!

Hahaha thank you!

User avatar
Drew Durrnil
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1830
Founded: Apr 30, 2020
Anarchy

Postby Drew Durrnil » Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:08 pm

Change the validity to "Invalid for socialist nations". It's way cleaner.
Last edited by Drew Durrnil on Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
also known as pacific shores
author of sc #434
professional slab worshipper
lieutenant of the south pacific special forces
2023 ananke award co-winner
Rosartemis wrote:DOWN WITH UEPU THOSE DAMNED RAIDERS!

User avatar
Yoyoyoyoyo
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Sep 03, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Yoyoyoyoyo » Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:30 am

8)
Drew Durrnil wrote:Change the validity to "Invalid for socialist nations". It's way cleaner.

Thank you!

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27180
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Tue Aug 10, 2021 5:32 am

Why was this company recieving such heavy subsidise in the first place?
Hard-Core Centrist. Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right.
All in-character posts are fictional and have no actual connection to any real governments
You don't appreciate the good police officers until you've lived amongst the dregs of society and/or had them as customers
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
Issues and WA Proposals Written By Me |Issue Ideas You Can Steal
I want to commission infrastructure in Australia in real life, if you can help me, please telegram me. I am dead serious


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads