Ideal Britain wrote:1) Personally ordered the arrest of a political opponent with no actual evidence.
There was intelligence of a terror plot that would have killed the PM (the man ordering the arrest) if carried out. Given the MI5 undercover operation, evidence was likely but none came up so he was released.
Arrest only requires reasonable suspicion under British law and he was treated well.2) Ordered the Army and Royal Navy to occupy Newcastle due to a minor civil disturbance.
The "minor" civil disturbance was terror-related. The government sent troops in because the police were not fit to deal with the disturbance (like how the Northern Ireland thing begun).
This followed the guidelines surrounding military aid to civil power.
Imagine the political, human and law and order fallout if the police officers had been beaten to death and a terrorist released.
Right. I mean you could argue with someone who studied English criminal law about what constitutes "reasonable suspicion" (hint: it's not a phone call from the PM) but again you're missing the point.
Khan personally orders the arrest of this guy, orders his release, tries to form a political coalition with him that would destroy the UK, then challenges him to an MMA match. All within a few days.
This is a political roleplay. Any one of these bizarre actions would have enormous political repercussions that are completely ignored. Khan strolls around unilaterally raising pay and building steel mills, raising his support by 3.7% percent or whatever. There are no real consequences to his actions. There's no drama. It's boring. You realize this. You fix it by concentrating on the story rather than asking incessant questions about nonsensical details.