Advertisement
by Borderlands of Rojava » Tue May 04, 2021 7:22 pm
by Mercatus » Tue May 04, 2021 7:32 pm
New haven america wrote:Page wrote:Black people love white people treating them like helpless children who can't make their own decisions, everyone knows that! Right?
This is just another step in a long line of moronic tobacco/nicotine policies in the United States. First you have the fiasco of cities, states, and the feds killing vaping, one of the greatest harm reduction advancements in human history! It especially ramped up after this "EVALI" garbage. For those of you who don't know, there was one specific type of illicit THC cartridge laced with Vitamin E acetate which is very, very poisonous and made people sick, so the government responded by... banning flavored nicotine products?
Let's put this into perspective: Imagine that a single farmer sold black market milk poisoned with cyanide and the government's response was to ban coffee nationwide.
Then with cigarettes, you have the FDA GIVING PEOPLE MORE CANCER by limiting the amount of nicotine in cigarettes. Lower nicotine content doesn't stop addiction! In fact, nicotine addiction has almost nothing to do with the amount in a single dose and everything to do with the frequency of consumption. A person consuming 10 very low nicotine cigarettes throughout the day will get addicted much, much faster than a person inhaling a metric fuckton of nicotine once or twice a day. But what's worse is that nicotine limits will cause smokers to smoke more. We KNOW THIS, because this is what happened with lights. When lights came out, smokers started covering the perforated filters to compensate for the reduction.
If smokers aren't getting an adequate nicotine hit, they will inhale deeper, longer, more frequently, and smoke more cigarettes.
And by the way, all over the country, they're doing the same moronic thing with medicinal cannabis. Banning high THC bud, the dumbest thing you could do. Don't take one little puff of this high THC product to get what you're looking for, no, smoke 4 whole joints of government approved weak-ass shit. Your lungs don't have enough tar in them!
Vaping produces most of the same side effects of regular nicotine/pot smoking, along with the fact that a lot of vape companies targeted high schoolers specifically to get them addicted early in life.
So no, it was not and never has been "One of the greatest harm reeducation advancements in human history!"
by Washington Resistance Army » Tue May 04, 2021 7:38 pm
by Mercatus » Tue May 04, 2021 7:40 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Ban all cigarettes tbh
by Bombadil » Tue May 04, 2021 7:49 pm
by Torisakia » Tue May 04, 2021 7:51 pm
[TNN] A cargo ship belonging to Torisakia disappeared off the coast of Kostane late Wednesday evening. TBI suspects foul play. || Congress passes a T$10 billion aid package for the Democratic Populist rebels in Kostane. To include firearms, vehicles, and artillery.
by Just-An-Illusion » Tue May 04, 2021 7:58 pm
Torisakia wrote:Now if he bans alcohol I might see this as some decent legislation from the government for once.
by Torisakia » Tue May 04, 2021 8:01 pm
[TNN] A cargo ship belonging to Torisakia disappeared off the coast of Kostane late Wednesday evening. TBI suspects foul play. || Congress passes a T$10 billion aid package for the Democratic Populist rebels in Kostane. To include firearms, vehicles, and artillery.
by Just-An-Illusion » Tue May 04, 2021 8:03 pm
by Torisakia » Tue May 04, 2021 8:04 pm
[TNN] A cargo ship belonging to Torisakia disappeared off the coast of Kostane late Wednesday evening. TBI suspects foul play. || Congress passes a T$10 billion aid package for the Democratic Populist rebels in Kostane. To include firearms, vehicles, and artillery.
by Ethel mermania » Tue May 04, 2021 8:05 pm
Deacarsia wrote:While I strongly oppose the usage of tobacco products, I must oppose this sort of a ban.
It seems overly intrusive, and I fail to see what it actually will accomplish.
by Western Fardelshufflestein » Tue May 04, 2021 8:05 pm
The Western Fardelshufflestein Sentinel | 27 November 2022 bUt wHy iS tHE rUm gOnE!?
by Coicantrost Terbi » Tue May 04, 2021 8:20 pm
by Senkaku » Tue May 04, 2021 8:35 pm
Political Geography wrote:Coicantrost Terbi wrote:The black market just got a new in-demand product they can offer.
I've smoked tobacco a friend grew and "cured" himself. It ... would take a bit of getting used to. He kept smoking it but I know of nobody else who went back unless they were literally broke.
Quite legal at the time I believe. Any farmer could grow a certain number of plants (5?) and just say they were using it for insecticide. Maybe not legal now.
by Coicantrost Terbi » Tue May 04, 2021 8:41 pm
Borderlands of Rojava wrote:Watch the local vape shops in my area continue selling them. I can't tell you how much shady shit I've seen go down in those places.
by Badassistanian » Tue May 04, 2021 9:43 pm
by North Washington Republic » Tue May 04, 2021 10:04 pm
Madrinpoor wrote:Heaven Hieghts wrote:Delete if someone made a thread about this already.
FDA ban on menthol cigarettes: Bad for criminal justice, health policy
Biden Administration Plans to Propose Banning Menthol Cigarettes
This seems like lazy health policy. If Biden really wanted to support the health of black communities, it seems more effective to invest in public health options in low income communities. While that's expensive and requires personnel to fill the roles necessary, banning menthols seems like a non-solution to extensive and complex problem. I mean, won't menthol smokers just switch to using other forms of tobacco products?
The thing is, Menthol is the flavoring for cigarettes. It creates a cooling sensation in your throat so you don't feel like you're burning your throat, which you are when you smoke.
Also, it is an issue for Black communities as they are targeted with Menthol: Here is a handy article
Vistulange wrote:Heaven Hieghts wrote:Delete if someone made a thread about this already.
FDA ban on menthol cigarettes: Bad for criminal justice, health policy
Biden Administration Plans to Propose Banning Menthol Cigarettes
This seems like lazy health policy. If Biden really wanted to support the health of black communities, it seems more effective to invest in public health options in low income communities. While that's expensive and requires personnel to fill the roles necessary, banning menthols seems like a non-solution to extensive and complex problem. I mean, won't menthol smokers just switch to using other forms of tobacco products?
Sure, other, more comprehensive policies would certainly be better, but have you ever smoked a menthol cigarette and then a non-menthol cigarette?
Folks used to menthol cigarettes aren't easily going to pick up non-menthol cigarettes*. It might be lazy, but I wouldn't say it's ineffective.
*Unless there's research on this that concludes otherwise.
Borderlands of Rojava wrote:Watch the local vape shops in my area continue selling them. I can't tell you how much shady shit I've seen go down in those places.
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Ban all cigarettes tbh
by Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum » Tue May 04, 2021 10:11 pm
by North Washington Republic » Tue May 04, 2021 10:13 pm
Badassistanian wrote:Tbh, good... Cigarettes should be classed as a decriminalized drug where its illegal to posses and use them but the punishment for it is rehab or medically assisted quitting. Then we should completely legalize weed and push it as a replacement.
by North Washington Republic » Tue May 04, 2021 10:17 pm
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:Today it is forbidden to smoke menthol, cannabis and alcohol are forbidden tomorrow. The prohibitory mindset will never win, please leave people alone. The world should gather and tell the United States of America that gun kills more people than cigarettes.(Image)
by Deacarsia » Tue May 04, 2021 10:24 pm
Political Geography wrote:Slippery slope fallacy. Menthol is not a drug. The prohibitory mindset works fine on superficial additives, for instance hundreds of food chemicals we don't even know the name of. For longer shelf life, or simply to save money avoiding the chemicals, there's no way private enterprise would have eliminated chemicals the consumer isn't even aware of.
Or fucking lead. There is no safe level of lead exposure, yet it was cheap and effective to improve the octane of fuel by catalysis. The customers weren't going to demand its removal from petrol because the customers weren't the main victims of it.
Why you would mention guns when making an argument against "prohibitionism" I can't imagine.
by Uzbekstaland » Tue May 04, 2021 10:25 pm
by Uzbekstaland » Tue May 04, 2021 10:26 pm
Deacarsia wrote:Political Geography wrote:Slippery slope fallacy. Menthol is not a drug. The prohibitory mindset works fine on superficial additives, for instance hundreds of food chemicals we don't even know the name of. For longer shelf life, or simply to save money avoiding the chemicals, there's no way private enterprise would have eliminated chemicals the consumer isn't even aware of.
Or fucking lead. There is no safe level of lead exposure, yet it was cheap and effective to improve the octane of fuel by catalysis. The customers weren't going to demand its removal from petrol because the customers weren't the main victims of it.
Why you would mention guns when making an argument against "prohibitionism" I can't imagine.
Correct me if I am wrong, but is not menthol present in most mints?
by North Washington Republic » Tue May 04, 2021 10:27 pm
by Deacarsia » Tue May 04, 2021 10:28 pm
Uzbekstaland wrote:Guys enough about prohibition, we arent going back to that time.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Almighty Biden, Ancientania, Elejamie, Ethel mermania, General TN, Kenmoria, Tungstan, Uiiop, Zetaopalatopia
Advertisement