Imperium Anglorum wrote:Elsie Mortimer Wellesley. At the end of section 3, inNotwithstanding the above, member state courts must not admit relevant evidence of the victim’s past sexual behavior or proclivity that is substantially more prejudicial against the victim than it is probative to the satisfaction of the crime’s elements.
Is the invocation of 'relevant evidence' intentional?
"No, it appears unnecessary. I will so adjust."