NATION

PASSWORD

American Politics IV: 1400 Reasons Why(A Stimulus Serial)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7059
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dresderstan » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:19 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:If my grandfather, who was a coal miner heard that he'd be pissed.

It's better to be angry than poor and uneducated as a country.

How fucking offensive.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:20 pm

Dresderstan wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
A debate isn’t simply yes or no. What is your reason for opposing RCV?

It's not proportional to the votes of the country.

And in ranked choice no ones voted is wasted. Why is proportionately so important? In rcv if people wanted the green or libertarian candidate they can vote for them and not waste their votes. Who knows they might even win an election they wouldn’t under fptp.

No one can without a majority in rcv and isn’t that your whole issue? Rcv solves that.

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:20 pm

Picairn wrote:
Sundiata wrote:Not just tell them, we should actively spend tax-payer money on it and make access to this information and skill-set free.

Oh my fucking god you're serious. Well, good luck with the backlash.

We shouldn't cater to the whims of luddites.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
Neanderthaland
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9295
Founded: Sep 10, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Neanderthaland » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:21 pm

Dresderstan wrote:
Picairn wrote:Let me guess, you are going to tell coal miners and factory workers to "learn to code"? It's not like it backfired or something.

If my grandfather, who was a coal miner heard that he'd be pissed.

This is a profession that is widely known to be both terrible for the environment, and terrible for the health of the people who do it. And whose only virtue is that it doesn't require a lot of education.

Let's maybe not hold this up as the gold standard for which workers should aspire?
Ug make fire. Mod ban Ug.

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:21 pm

Dresderstan wrote:
Sundiata wrote:It's better to be angry than poor and uneducated as a country.

How fucking offensive.

Really? Why are you so resistant to change? Other than an appeal to tradition.
Last edited by Sundiata on Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:22 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Picairn wrote:Oh my fucking god you're serious. Well, good luck with the backlash.

We shouldn't cater to the whims of luddites.

Coal mining is a dying industry not to mention the environmental damage it does.

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:22 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Sundiata wrote:We shouldn't cater to the whims of luddites.

Coal mining is a dying industry not to mention the environmental damage it does.

And thank God it's dying.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7059
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dresderstan » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:22 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:It's not proportional to the votes of the country.

And in ranked choice no ones voted is wasted. Why is proportionately so important? In rcv if people wanted the green or libertarian candidate they can vote for them and not waste their votes. Who knows they might even win an election they wouldn’t under fptp.

No one can without a majority in rcv and isn’t that your whole issue? Rcv solves that.

Neither is in a PR system, a vote is never wasted.

Pah no they won't, the top two will always be Dem and Rep, especially with the propaganda and fearmongering about "coalition" it's why the two parties need to be broken up, no more big tent bullshit parties.

Neither can one in a PR system.

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7059
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dresderstan » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:24 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Picairn wrote:Oh my fucking god you're serious. Well, good luck with the backlash.

We shouldn't cater to the whims of luddites.

We shouldn't care to the whims of people who think they know better than the people like you seem to think so.

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7059
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dresderstan » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:24 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:How fucking offensive.

Really? Why are you so resistant to change? Other than an appeal to tradition.

Twist my words why don't you buddy. :roll:

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:24 pm

Dresderstan wrote:
San Lumen wrote:And in ranked choice no ones voted is wasted. Why is proportionately so important? In rcv if people wanted the green or libertarian candidate they can vote for them and not waste their votes. Who knows they might even win an election they wouldn’t under fptp.

No one can without a majority in rcv and isn’t that your whole issue? Rcv solves that.

Neither is in a PR system, a vote is never wasted.

Pah no they won't, the top two will always be Dem and Rep, especially with the propaganda and fearmongering about "coalition" it's why the two parties need to be broken up, no more big tent bullshit parties.

Neither can one in a PR system.

You don’t know that. Stop making generalizations.

You also can’t legally break up a political party. It would be unconstitutional.

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7059
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dresderstan » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:25 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:Neither is in a PR system, a vote is never wasted.

Pah no they won't, the top two will always be Dem and Rep, especially with the propaganda and fearmongering about "coalition" it's why the two parties need to be broken up, no more big tent bullshit parties.

Neither can one in a PR system.

You don’t know that. Stop making generalizations.

You also can’t legally break up a political party. It would be unconstitutional.

And you do?

Hasn't stopped the two parties from violating the constitution so many times before.

User avatar
Neanderthaland
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9295
Founded: Sep 10, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Neanderthaland » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:26 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Sundiata wrote:We shouldn't cater to the whims of luddites.

Coal mining is a dying industry not to mention the environmental damage it does.

And when we've given subsidies to the coal mining industry, it hasn't brought coal mining jobs back. Gone are the days where men actually went into coal mines. These days they just dig up the whole mountain with enormous machines, and you only need a few people to do that.

The only thing the subsidies do is directly increase the company's profits while not trickling down to the employees at all.
Ug make fire. Mod ban Ug.

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:26 pm

Dresderstan wrote:
Sundiata wrote:We shouldn't cater to the whims of luddites.

We shouldn't care to the whims of people who think they know better than the people like you seem to think so.

Oh here it goes again. It's not elitist to pay for poor people's educations with my tax dollars. The coal mines aren't coming back.

We should make it easier to educate people instead of leaving them poor and uneducated.
Last edited by Sundiata on Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:27 pm

Dresderstan wrote:
San Lumen wrote:You don’t know that. Stop making generalizations.

You also can’t legally break up a political party. It would be unconstitutional.

And you do?

Hasn't stopped the two parties from violating the constitution so many times before.


Not an expert on every election in every city with it. Your way is not the only solution.

RCV allows for third parties to win. You simply don’t like your desired outcome isn’t always produced.

Also do you acknowledge the environmental damage coal mining does?
Last edited by San Lumen on Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Picairn
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10550
Founded: Feb 21, 2020
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Picairn » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:27 pm

Sundiata wrote:We shouldn't cater to the whims of luddites.

This gives off big condescension energy. You are essentially telling adult to middle-aged workers to learn coding and compete against freshly out-of-college youngsters who had 4 years of studying beforehand. Maybe transition them to the green energy sector instead, and expand public works.
Picairn's Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Minister: Edward H. Cornell
WA Ambassador: John M. Terry (Active)
Factbook | Constitution | Newspaper
Social democrat, passionate political observer, and naval warfare enthusiast.
More NSG-y than NSG veterans
♛ The Empire of Picairn ♛
-✯ ✯ ✯ ✯ ✯-—————————-✯ ✯ ✯ ✯ ✯-
Colonel (Brevet) of the North Pacific Army, COO of Warzone Trinidad

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7059
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dresderstan » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:28 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:We shouldn't care to the whims of people who think they know better than the people like you seem to think so.

Oh here it goes again. It's not elitist to pay for poor people's educations with my tax dollars. The coal mines aren't coming back.

It's elitist to pay for champagne, caviar and have it all on one's yacht while people millions starve and struggle with homelessness.

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7059
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dresderstan » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:29 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Dresderstan wrote:And you do?

Hasn't stopped the two parties from violating the constitution so many times before.


Not an expert on every election in every city with it. Your way is not the only solution.

RCV allows for third parties to win. You simply don’t like your desired outcome isn’t always produced.

Also do you acknowledge the environmental damage coal mining does?

It's a far better solution.

Because it doesn't work.

Let me put it to you this way, Knox Mine disaster.
Last edited by Dresderstan on Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:29 pm

Picairn wrote:
Sundiata wrote:We shouldn't cater to the whims of luddites.

This gives off big condescension energy. You are essentially telling adult to middle-aged workers to learn coding and compete against freshly out-of-college youngsters who had 4 years of studying beforehand. Maybe transition them to the green energy sector instead, and expand public works.

We can do that too, I don't mind. I'm not being condescending or elitist.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
Tsaivao
Diplomat
 
Posts: 594
Founded: Apr 07, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsaivao » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:29 pm

San Lumen wrote:You also can’t legally break up a political party. It would be unconstitutional.

Just gonna sidestep in here and say that the constitution doesn't even mention political parties, so it's certainly not going to have any constitutionality associated with making or breaking apart a political party.
~::~ May the five winds guide us to glory ~::~
OPERATION TEN-GO: Tsaivao Authority confirms wormhole drives based on alien designs are functional | Gen. Tsaosin: "Operational integrity is the key to our success against the xenic threat. In a week, we will have already infiltrated into their world." | All leaders of Tsaivao send personal farewells to Ten-Go special forces unit Tsaikantan-8
Nation doesn't reflect my personal beliefs, NS stats aren't really worried about except for Nudity because "haha funny"
The symbol on my flag is supposed to be a typhoon
Pro: LGBT, BLM, Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Rationalism
Neutral: Gun Rights, Abortion, Centrism
Anti: Trumpism, Radicalization, Fundamentalism, Fascism

User avatar
Dresderstan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7059
Founded: Jan 18, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dresderstan » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:30 pm

Sundiata wrote:
Picairn wrote:This gives off big condescension energy. You are essentially telling adult to middle-aged workers to learn coding and compete against freshly out-of-college youngsters who had 4 years of studying beforehand. Maybe transition them to the green energy sector instead, and expand public works.

We can do that too, I don't mind. I'm not being condescending or elitist.

Except you are when you said "just have them do coding lol"

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44956
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:30 pm

Tsaivao wrote:
San Lumen wrote:You also can’t legally break up a political party. It would be unconstitutional.

Just gonna sidestep in here and say that the constitution doesn't even mention political parties, so it's certainly not going to have any constitutionality associated with making or breaking apart a political party.

freedom of association, first amendment
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.



Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
Neanderthaland
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9295
Founded: Sep 10, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Neanderthaland » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:31 pm

Look guys. If working in a mail center payed enough that you could support your family on it, then men with little education wouldn't be drawn towards jobs like coal mining in the first place.

Instead of holding up a (literally) toxic industry as a sort of model to be aspired to, let's make it so that workers don't have to risk their health to make a decent wage.
Ug make fire. Mod ban Ug.

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44956
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:33 pm

American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.



Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87246
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:33 pm

Dresderstan wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Not an expert on every election in every city with it. Your way is not the only solution.

RCV allows for third parties to win. You simply don’t like your desired outcome isn’t always produced.

Also do you acknowledge the environmental damage coal mining does?

It's a far better solution.

Because it doesn't work.

Let me put it to you this way, Knox Mine disaster.


How is it better?

How does it not work?

So you do acknowledge it and that the industry needs to disappear?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, DataDyneIrkenAlliance, Fartsniffage, Foxyshire, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Jerzylvania, Jute, Mystery7, Ors Might, Pale Dawn, Tiami, Tungstan, Valrifall

Advertisement

Remove ads