Partnership for Sovereignty | SC Voting Bloc

by **Reploid Productions** » Wed Mar 03, 2021 1:28 pm

Parxland wrote:
The Notorious Mad Jack wrote:-

sounds like some people don't want the LCN to join this alliance.

Would reallly suck for them if somebody helped the process along.

Either spill the bloody tea already or quit vagueposting about Schrodingers Tea. :roll:

by **The Notorious Mad Jack** » Wed Mar 03, 2021 1:42 pm

Parxland wrote:
The Notorious Mad Jack wrote:-

sounds like some people don't want the LCN to join this alliance.

Would reallly suck for them if somebody helped the process along.

Personally I don't have an opinion on whether LCN should PfS. I do think PfS have treated LCN quite shoddily - and that complaints over the public nature of LCN's response are hypocritical in the extreme - and should apologise to LCN over that. Beyond that, I don't really care if LCN joins or doesn't.

by **Quebecshire** » Wed Mar 03, 2021 1:43 pm

Numero Capitan wrote:The time it has taken to consider this issue doesn't surprise me as a complete outsider, and as others have commented the longer deliberation period likely worked in your favour in terms of fairly considering the application and your reforms rather than acting on first impressions (even if it didn't ultimately result in the outcome you desired).

It's really difficult to take this with more than a grain of salt when we still don't know what was done nor what conclusions were decided upon (is it too soon? are there more things we should have changed? etc? I've asked more than once, to no answer, such a shame!). The "well, actually, making the LCN wait on no info for a month was good for them" doesn't track the way it's being said.

The PfS should release the vote and say what conclusions were arrived at if they want that claim to be taken seriously by us.

by **Quebecshire** » Wed Mar 03, 2021 1:44 pm

Parxland wrote:
The Notorious Mad Jack wrote:-

sounds like some people don't want the LCN to join this alliance.

Would reallly suck for them if somebody helped the process along.

You are not involved in LCN foreign affairs whatsoever and the Office of the Consulate not only doesn't support but actively disavows your rhetoric and conduct in most or all cases.

by **Varanius** » Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:04 pm

Parxland wrote:
The Notorious Mad Jack wrote:-

sounds like some people don't want the LCN to join this alliance.

Would reallly suck for them if somebody helped the process along.

Will you be doing that before or after you dig up my old discord messages? Speaking of which, how were those supposed to get to my region? Will you be sending telegrams? RMB posting? Do you take weekends off? Back to the point, I’m stunned at the amount of power you apparently have over the entire defender sphere. Clearly enough to shove in a region they don’t seem to want in their WA bloc through anyways! Being completely serious, given the above message from Quebec, they don’t seem to want your help. It’s also weird how as far as I’ve seen, no prominent or remotely notable defender has even stated their agreement with you on anything. It’s also incredibly unusual for a citizenship application to take a whole 40 days, but that’s probably just more proof of the fact you have such control of the defender sphere you can get the LCN into PfS when whoever that one aye voter was couldn’t.

by **Parxland** » Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:02 pm

Quebecshire wrote:
Parxland wrote:
sounds like some people don't want the LCN to join this alliance.

Would reallly suck for them if somebody helped the process along.

You are not involved in LCN foreign affairs whatsoever and the Office of the Consulate not only doesn't support but actively disavows your rhetoric and conduct in most or all cases.

Okay? Good luck I guess.

by **Partnership for Sovereignty** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 9:40 am

The Partnership for Sovereignty is proud to admit Philippines as its seventh member!

by **Tinhampton** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 11:12 am

Thankfully you guys didn't listen to my logo suggestion, it'ld be a mess if you did by now

by **Qvait** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 6:15 pm

Partnership for Sovereignty wrote:The Partnership for Sovereignty is proud to admit Philippines as its seventh member!

Welcome to the PfS! This partnership just gets better and better.

by **Parxland** » Mon Mar 22, 2021 6:22 am

by **Partnership for Sovereignty** » Mon Aug 16, 2021 4:33 pm

The Partnership for Sovereignty is proud to announce the admission of The League as its eighth member.

by **Khevo** » Mon Aug 16, 2021 4:35 pm

Congratulations, and welcome!

by **The Python** » Mon Aug 16, 2021 4:36 pm

Partnership for Sovereignty wrote:The Partnership for Sovereignty is proud to announce the admission of The League as its eighth member.

da league

by **Qvait** » Mon Aug 16, 2021 4:52 pm

Welcome to the PfS!

by **Zukchiva** » Mon Aug 16, 2021 5:03 pm

Woot, congrats to the League!

by **Creeperopolis** » Mon Aug 16, 2021 5:30 pm

The Republic of The League would like to thank the Partnership for Sovereignty for accepting us as the 8th member of the PfS. We look forward to a future of cooperation and warm relations will the PfS and all of its member regions.

The League's Delegation to the PfS:
Creeperopolis – Chief Consul
Paleocacher – Consul, World Assembly Delegate
Quebecshire – Consul, military representative, and advisor
Spode Humbled Minions – Director Foreign Affairs

by **Refuge Isle** » Mon Aug 16, 2021 7:35 pm

Congrats to The League on achieving their goals of membership, may PfS be improved by the added contributions :blush:

by **Amerion** » Mon Aug 16, 2021 9:31 pm

Welcome, The League!

by **South Asians** » Tue Aug 17, 2021 1:02 am

Congratz and Welcome to the PfS, The League!

by **Emodea** » Tue Aug 17, 2021 1:59 am

Welcome to the PfS! Glad to have you with us.

by **Wischland** » Tue Aug 17, 2021 1:57 pm

Congratulations to The League and welcome to the PfS! XKI is looking forward to working with you!

by **Tim-Opolis** » Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:04 am

Should’ve been accepted the first time. Congratulations to both The League and the PfS.

by **Homyland** » Thu Aug 26, 2021 3:26 am

Uhhhhh... I have a concern.
You guys TGed me with your BS when I didn't ask for it. I asked for TNP's IFV, not yours. I've already sent a (notoriously angry) telegram, which has been ignored.

Anyway, straight to the point: I don't want your bs, I didn't ask for it. I demand, at the very least, an assurance that this will never happen again. That would demonstrate that at least 0.01% of you is comprised by humans above 100 IQ.

by **Sedgistan** » Thu Aug 26, 2021 3:32 am

Homyland wrote:Uhhhhh... I have a concern.
You guys TGed me with your BS when I didn't ask for it. I asked for TNP's IFV, not yours. I've already sent a (notoriously angry) telegram, which has been ignored.

Anyway, straight to the point: I don't want your bs, I didn't ask for it. I demand, at the very least, an assurance that this will never happen again. That would demonstrate that at least 0.01% of you is comprised by humans above 100 IQ.

Given the contents of the telegram you sent in combination with your post above - *** warned for flamebaiting ***.

Just block their telegrams if you don't want them.

by **Haganham** » Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:10 am

Leaving aside... that. Given how opposed some of your members, such as XKI are to telegram campaigns don't you think it's a tad hypocritical to be doing it yourselves? Like I don't mind them myself, as a nation or as a regional leader, but if you're going to use them you should not be acting like it is an act of belligerence when others do the same.

Partnership for Sovereignty | SC Voting Bloc

TL Joins PfS

Who is online