[Report] Possible Child Porn and NSFW on PiffleNet 3.0

[Greater Sacramento]

This one appears to be underage viewtopic.php?p=36767325&sid=3abe1cfde19d0e7d322b310283a03958#p36767325

The thread overall seems to be very NSFW regardless

[Crazy girl]

I've moved the thread the evidence locker for review and a trawl, warnings will be handed out when I've had a chance to go through all 234 pages. After a quick skim I'm not likely to move it back.

[Kuronami]

I would like for moderation to consider an appeal for this. As far as I could tell, nothing in the thread ever exceeded the forum's PG-13 standards, and I certainly keep a firm grasp on the rules for the thread overall. With two threads and 734 total pages nobody in forum moderation/admin has had any problems with it so far. I realize I do rely heavily on the honor system of other players here.

[Lillorainen]

As a regular of Piffle, I would also like to add, that the thread is consistently frequented by a Moderator itself - namely NVI. I'm pretty confident, that he would have reported any rule violation to his colleagues in order to urge them to deal with them, if any had occured to him.

[Santheres]

I would like for moderation to consider an appeal for this. As far as I could tell, nothing in the thread ever exceeded the forum's PG-13 standards, and I certainly keep a firm grasp on the rules for the thread overall. With two threads and 734 total pages nobody in forum moderation/admin has had any problems with it so far. I realize I do rely heavily on the honor system of other players here.

There is at this time nothing for you to appeal. It's still being reviewed.

As a regular of Piffle, I would also like to add, that the thread is consistently frequented by a Moderator itself - namely NVI. I'm pretty confident, that he would have reported any rule violation to his colleagues in order to urge them to deal with them, if any had occured to him.

You cannot assume that NVI reads every page, much less every post in the thread.

[Jebslund]

If this is reporting the image I think it's reporting, the character depicted is male.

EDIT: Not the defendant, just supplying (I believe) relevant info.

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

So as a thread participant charged with participating in an "NSFW thread" how's things going?

[Crazy girl]

Page 162 of 234.

[Jarvikan]

Thanks for reporting this.I have seen this on a game about countries disgusting.

[Thermodolia]

Page 162 of 234.

Thanks for the update.

*gives cookies*

[Santheres]

Thanks for reporting this.I have seen this on a game about countries disgusting.

Please do not post unless you have something to add or are involved in the thread in question.

If you had seen something questionable previously, you should have reported it. There's no risk associated with reporting.

[Novaya Equestria]

If I ask, mods, has there been any NSFW stuffs there? Just making sure there are.

[Santheres]

If I ask, mods, has there been any NSFW stuffs there? Just making sure there are.

It's being reviewed and discussed. There were many pages.

[Crazy girl]

Having trawled through 234 pages with plenty of scantily clad (anime) women, and understanding how Pifflenet got the nickname big tiddy anime waifu social network, we have come to the following verdict:

*** Kuronami - DEAT for serious violation of the PG-13 rule. ***

*** The Selkie/Kyrenaia/Okunaratsuru - 3 day forum ban for excessively posting sexualised pictures. ***

*** Shikonjima - warned for posting an inappropriate image ***

Others have been posting images that skirt the lines and all together you have created quite a collection, enough to leave the Piffle thread in the evidence locker out of sight, permanently.

I'm willing to give you all another chance, as there did seem to be a number of you playing well within the lines and just having a good time roleplaying characters within your nation on a social network, which we do not want to take away. But hear me, if this next thread descends into another excuse to post images that skirt the PG 13 line and that are sexualised, we will lock it down permanently.

[Polish Prussian Commonwealth]

Question; does this mean that this thread(new name pending to differentiate it from piffle) can be unlocked now? There's less chance of it veering into the same territory piffle did due to the fact that you're not supposed to post images at all.

[Crazy girl]

Sure, unlocked.

[AHSCA]

Can I request a mod privately contact me through TG or whatever else you think is appropriate? I want to know if which if any posts of my own you deem inappropriate.

[Sedgistan]

You'll need to Getting Help Request that - we don't handle moderation business via telegram.

[AHSCA]

Thank you.

[Agarath]

Should the mod put the other previous thread into mod locker too? It also contains *coughs* scantily clad anime grill (Oh you dont need to skim it, from 450 to 500 already brimming with dark magic)
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=447069&start=12375

I know this is already a year old (mods might ignore it) but people might stumble upon a nasty relic of past. just sayin

[The Unified Missourtama States]

.

[Santheres]

Yes, notably as age of thread/post does not matter to, say, advertisers so much as "it is present - I have moved that thread into the locker as well.

Thanks!