by Parxland » Sun Jan 24, 2021 2:22 am
by Reploid Productions » Sun Jan 24, 2021 2:39 am
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Attempted Socialism » Sun Jan 24, 2021 4:16 am
Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship. | Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt? Bobberino: "The academic tone shines through." | Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes My NS career |
by Miku the Based » Sun Jan 24, 2021 4:23 am
by New Providence- » Sun Jan 24, 2021 4:27 am
Local pub gossip
"Ay matey, you look like you're getting old, do you want to buy a tobacco farm and settle down? For just 900 pesos, I could get you a decent plot of land and teach you how to grow it." | "Join the Providentian navy today and become a proud sailor. We give the best pay in all of the New World!" | "Do YOU want Piracy to get criminalized? Do YOU want thousands of our brothers to lose their livelihoods? If not, VOTE for the Traditionalist Party!"
by Shazbotdom » Sun Jan 24, 2021 4:47 am
Miku the Based wrote:No. Nothing is sacred, everything is permitted.
Criticize everything, prevent censorship.
I don't care if it's crazy fringe right wing stuff, it's not worth banning people for thinking that way.
ShazWeb || IIWiki || Discord: shazbertbot || 1 x NFL Picks League Champion (2021)
CosmoCast || SISA || CCD || CrawDaddy || SCIA || COPEC || Boudreaux's || CLS || SNC || ShazAir || BHC || TWO
NHL: NYR 1 - 0 WSH | COL 0 - 1 WPG | VGK 0 - 0 DAL || NBA: NOLA (8) 0 - 1 OKC (1)
NCAA MBB: Tulane 22-18 | LSU 25-16 || NCAA WSB: LSU 35-10
by Attempted Socialism » Sun Jan 24, 2021 5:07 am
Miku the Based wrote:No. Nothing is sacred, everything is permitted.
Criticize everything, prevent censorship.
I don't care if it's crazy fringe right wing stuff, it's not worth banning people for thinking that way.
Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship. | Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt? Bobberino: "The academic tone shines through." | Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes My NS career |
by Jebslund » Sun Jan 24, 2021 6:07 am
by Picairn » Sun Jan 24, 2021 6:13 am
Jebslund wrote:I wholeheartedly agree. There's biased media, and there's promoting terrorism, and Q-Anon is definitely the latter.
As to implementation, I think the fairest way would be to have a grace period after an announcement pinned to all boards, and possibly a VoM TG so no one has any excuse for not knowing.
by Aikoland » Sun Jan 24, 2021 6:16 am
Miku the Based wrote:I don't care if it's crazy fringe right wing stuff, it's not worth banning people for thinking that way.
by Kragholm Free States » Sun Jan 24, 2021 6:25 am
Aikoland wrote:Miku the Based wrote:I don't care if it's crazy fringe right wing stuff, it's not worth banning people for thinking that way.
I mean I would say banning content relating to the crazed cult that literally attempted a coup d'état against the United States Government is a perfectly fair and fine thing to do. Cuz again, and I feel like I need to repeat this for you (and anyone else who says we shouldn't ban Q-Anon stuff here): We are not talking about some fringe extremely online right-wing thing anymore, we are now talking about an effective cult that is completely divorced from reality that was responsible for a terrorist attack on the United States Capitol in an attempt to keep Donald Trump in office.
by Jebslund » Sun Jan 24, 2021 6:29 am
Picairn wrote:Jebslund wrote:I wholeheartedly agree. There's biased media, and there's promoting terrorism, and Q-Anon is definitely the latter.
As to implementation, I think the fairest way would be to have a grace period after an announcement pinned to all boards, and possibly a VoM TG so no one has any excuse for not knowing.
This TBH. Then should we put Q-Anon content under the Trolling rule or create a separate category for it regarding punishment, like Covid-19?
by Dowaesk » Sun Jan 24, 2021 6:32 am
by Anglicora » Sun Jan 24, 2021 6:36 am
Shazbotdom wrote:Miku the Based wrote:No. Nothing is sacred, everything is permitted.
Criticize everything, prevent censorship.
I don't care if it's crazy fringe right wing stuff, it's not worth banning people for thinking that way.
Except it's not up to you. If the mods and Admins decide, through their discussions, that they want to ban any discussion of QAnon or it's ideologies, then that is their right.
by Greater Cesnica » Sun Jan 24, 2021 7:55 am
Sic Semper Tyrannis.
WA Discord Server
Authorship Dispatch
WA Ambassador: Slick McCooley
Firearm Rights are Human Rights
privacytools.io - Use these tools to safeguard your online activities, freedoms, and safety
My IFAK and Booboo Kit Starter Guide!
novemberstars#8888 on Discord
San Lumen wrote:You are ridiculous.George Orwell wrote:“That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.”
by Anglicora » Sun Jan 24, 2021 9:25 am
by Glorious Hong Kong » Sun Jan 24, 2021 9:28 am
by Jabberwocky » Sun Jan 24, 2021 9:34 am
by Greater Cesnica » Sun Jan 24, 2021 9:51 am
Jabberwocky wrote:Only illiterate redneck hillbillies embrace Qanon . They cannot read or write anyway.
Sic Semper Tyrannis.
WA Discord Server
Authorship Dispatch
WA Ambassador: Slick McCooley
Firearm Rights are Human Rights
privacytools.io - Use these tools to safeguard your online activities, freedoms, and safety
My IFAK and Booboo Kit Starter Guide!
novemberstars#8888 on Discord
San Lumen wrote:You are ridiculous.George Orwell wrote:“That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.”
by Comfed » Sun Jan 24, 2021 10:45 am
Anglicora wrote:That being said if QAnon content is banned because of extremism, why not ban Christianity? or Islam? or Atheism? Almost every movement large enough has violent fringes.
by The Reformed American Republic » Sun Jan 24, 2021 10:55 am
by Lockdownn » Sun Jan 24, 2021 11:12 am
Anglicora wrote:That being said if QAnon content is banned because of extremism, why not ban Christianity? or Islam? or Atheism? Almost every movement large enough has violent fringes.
by The New California Republic » Sun Jan 24, 2021 11:40 am
by Aeritai » Sun Jan 24, 2021 11:41 am
Anglicora wrote:That being said if QAnon content is banned because of extremism, why not ban Christianity? or Islam? or Atheism? Almost every movement large enough has violent fringes.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Apoar, Azurius, Maryyanne, Merien, New Rogernomics
Advertisement