Pacifist Nations Protection Act

[Keursa]

Addressing the issue of thy possibilities of war in which threatens nations whom are sworn to pacifism, hereby is of ultimate concern in which crucially requires the enactment of sustaining protection of these nations in which requires the demand of self sustained practice in order to be considered a pacifist nation includes:
1. Member nations of the WA must be within the top 20% of pacifist world ranking
2. Member nations of such ranking may only be within a region of pacifism.
3.Member nations may only be within the top 64% world ranking for arms manufacturing
4. Member nations may only be of the top 59% world ranking within pacifist regions.

If any nation meets such criterium that specific member nation of the WA cannot be attacked.
If any region meets such criterium it must be so that the region cannot interact with warring nations under any circumstances.

As long as a nation chooses to obey this act it is therefore so it may not be attacked by a warring nation.
This act hereby enforces as long as such criterium is met by a WA member nation then any nation who disobeys this act shall be condemned.

Hereby establishes pacifist nations protection act (PNPA)

[Ardiveds]

OOC: eyesore violation (that was a joke but seriously get rid of that obnoxious colour)
Metagaming rule violation (gameside stats). Basically gameside stats don't exist for the GA resolutions which is based on RP so you can't make resolutions based on those.

[Tinhampton]

Rights of Neutral States?

3.Member nations may only be within the top 64% world ranking for arms manufacturing

Keursa is currently only in the top 66% for Arms Manufacturing

[Grays Harbor]

Addressing the issue of thy possibilities of war in which threatens nations whom are sworn to pacifism, hereby is of ultimate concern in which crucially requires the enactment of sustaining protection of these nations in which requires the demand of self sustained practice in order to be considered a pacifist nation includes:
1. Member nations of the WA must be within the top 20% of pacifist world ranking
2. Member nations of such ranking may only be within a region of pacifism.
3.Member nations may only be within the top 64% world ranking for arms manufacturing
4. Member nations may only be of the top 59% world ranking within pacifist regions.

If any nation meets such criterium that specific member nation of the WA cannot be attacked.
If any region meets such criterium it must be so that the region cannot interact with warring nations under any circumstances.

As long as a nation chooses to obey this act it is therefore so it may not be attacked by a warring nation.
This act hereby enforces as long as such criterium is met by a WA member nation then any nation who disobeys this act shall be condemned.

Hereby establishes pacifist nations protection act (PNPA)

The whole thing is illegal for metagaming. WA rankings, Regions, and Condemnations cannot be in Proposals. At all.

And don’t post in colors.

[Keursa]

Sorry to disappoint you, but I am not the only nation that exists. It is only just for me to be fair. Though I may not be in the top 64% of those whom are in the required percentage ranking of arms manufacturing. It is only fair that each nation is recognized in an egalitarian respect, that respects not just my own to be "at all" to be WA Delegate.

[Separatist Peoples]

Sorry to disappoint you, but I am not the only nation that exists. It is only just for me to be fair. Though I may not be in the top 64% of those whom are in the required percentage ranking of arms manufacturing. It is only fair that each nation is recognized in an egalitarian respect, that respects not just my own to be "at all" to be WA Delegate.

Ooc: nobody is making that claim. The issues here are legal, not policy issues.

[Keursa]

Thank you. Now I understand. Do you mean the security council only addresses legal issues? I thought we could propose policy, so I appreciate your care. Blessed be.

[WayNeacTia]

I thought we could propose policy, so I appreciate your care. Blessed be.

You can. But as you were told, WA rankings, Regions, and Condemnations cannot be addressed in proposals. Those are game functions, which breaks the fourth wall and thus makes your draft illegal for metagaming.

[Wallenburg]

I don't have the patience to read a draft written in such a garish color. Black font, please.

[Barfleur]

As my nation is in the top 1% for arms manufacturing, I will just see myself out of this debate...

Thank you. Now I understand. Do you mean the security council only addresses legal issues? I thought we could propose policy, so I appreciate your care. Blessed be.

The General Assembly is primarily focused on "policy," in the sense that you propose a resolution that contains policy objectives you support, and if enough nations agree with you, it becomes law. But there are still rules which all GA proposals have to abide by in order to be allowed to be voted on. At the moment, this proposal violates the prohibition on "metagaming," which means you're trying to legislate in-game mechanics (in this case World Census statistics). You will also want to read passed GA resolutions to get a sense of what "proper" formatting looks like. Of course not all resolutions are formatted the same way, but there must be an operative clause somewhere in the text.

Also, please never again post a proposal in pink. We in the World Assembly are interesting people, but we're boring when it comes to colors.

[Untecna]

"Ahh, my eyes!"

OOC: Please change the text color. Also, this would be illegal for metagaming.