by Sedgistan » Wed Oct 28, 2020 12:59 pm
by Mathuvan Union » Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:05 pm
by Numero Capitan » Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:57 pm
by Mathuvan Union » Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:44 pm
Numero Capitan wrote:Not fully formed any thoughts on this yet but I really really don't like the pattern of moderation warnings of in-character hyperbolic statements. It's going to make people shy away from making any bold adversarial statements in Gameplay and further dampen the politics of this side of our political game.
by RiderSyl » Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:15 pm
by Unibot III » Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:56 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Sandaoguo » Thu Oct 29, 2020 9:12 am
by Roavin » Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:52 pm
by Blackbird » Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:54 pm
by The Blaatschapen » Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:25 am
by Mathuvan Union » Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:57 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:[OOC]
Though when the two things get mixed for example "defenders are QAnon enablers"? What then? I tend to go for the OOC being the stronger version there, since QAnon doesn't exist ICly (I hope)
by Unibot III » Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:17 am
Blackbird wrote:I entirely disagree with Unibot's notion that we can't call in-game groups "evil." I'm sure some of my much older friends, including those in moderation, well remember successful invasions where scores of natives were kicked out of their home region. Do you think, in a gameplay context, those natives shouldn't be allowed to call invaders evil? How can that possibly be? In the gameplay world, being invaded is like having your home razed and salt plowed into your field. Why would moderation truncate the full range of political expression in IC rhetoric?
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Blackbird » Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:54 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:[OOC]
Though when the two things get mixed for example "defenders are QAnon enablers"? What then? I tend to go for the OOC being the stronger version there, since QAnon doesn't exist ICly (I hope)
by Elegarth » Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:16 am
by Twobagger » Fri Oct 30, 2020 12:57 pm
The Blaatschapen wrote:[OOC]
Though when the two things get mixed for example "defenders are QAnon enablers"? What then? I tend to go for the OOC being the stronger version there, since QAnon doesn't exist ICly (I hope)
No one cares what scum like you say or do; you're all pathetic and will never amount to anything.
Lord Dominator wrote: Defender of the Year: Twobagger
Defender Awards 2019 wrote:The Sir Lans Award
[...]
The winner of the Award this year is Twobagger of the Ten Thousand Islands Treaty Organisation (TITO), who has willingly assisted in so many operations regardless of the region leading them. Congratulations Twobagger!
Benevolent Thomas wrote:Twobagger: +15 For Tactical Genius
by Vilverin » Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:24 pm
by The Church of Satan » Sat Oct 31, 2020 2:17 pm
by Varanius » Sat Oct 31, 2020 8:58 pm
Angeloid Astraea wrote:I can't think of anyone that creates controversy out of nothing better than you!
Excidium Planetis wrote:Yeah, if you could enlighten me as to why you're such an asshole, that would be great.
Koth wrote:Vara is such a dedicated hater, it's impressive
Mlakhavia wrote:Vara isn't a gameplay personality, he's a concentrated ball of spite
by Sedgistan » Sun Nov 01, 2020 12:11 pm
by Sedgistan » Sun Nov 01, 2020 3:06 pm
Sedgistan wrote:I'm open to a trial of treating the Gameplay forum as IC (and labelling threads/posts as IC/OOC when appropriate)
by Mathuvan Union » Sun Nov 01, 2020 3:10 pm
Sedgistan wrote:It's been raised elsewhere that my post wasn't entirely clear, so to clarify:Sedgistan wrote:I'm open to a trial of treating the Gameplay forum as IC (and labelling threads/posts as IC/OOC when appropriate)
That should read "assumed to be IC as default". It's not meant to suggest enforcing all content in Gameplay is IC, or to prevent anything being posted that is currently posted in the forum. It's just about potentially making clearer what is what.
And it's just a suggestion that is by no means a foregone conclusion. If you disagree with it, please do feel free to object.
by Jar Wattinree » Sun Nov 01, 2020 6:11 pm
Mathuvan Union wrote:Sedgistan wrote:It's been raised elsewhere that my post wasn't entirely clear, so to clarify:
That should read "assumed to be IC as default". It's not meant to suggest enforcing all content in Gameplay is IC, or to prevent anything being posted that is currently posted in the forum. It's just about potentially making clearer what is what.
And it's just a suggestion that is by no means a foregone conclusion. If you disagree with it, please do feel free to object.
So, everything now is IC instead of OOC unless tagged so?
by Jakker » Sun Nov 01, 2020 7:54 pm
The Bruce wrote:Mostly I feel sorry for [raiders], because they put in all this effort and at the end of the day have nothing to show for it and have created nothing.
by Mathuvan Union » Sun Nov 01, 2020 7:56 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement