Proposal as submitted expired and is currently at vote.
Proposal as archived. http://ifly6.no-ip.org/wa-proposal/gorundu_1602225448/
The first argument given in the proposed repeal is that the structure of Institutional Review Boards in GA 111 is insufficient because IRBs 'are not required to be staffed with medical experts'. This is untrue. GA 111 'Medical Research Ethics Act' defines an 'Institutional Review Board (IRB) as a board of individuals qualified to impartially analyse medical research proposals'. If such boards were not required to have medical experts – as claimed by the repeal – they would be unqualified to analyse such proposals. The repeal's claim is a legal impossibility.
GA 111. viewtopic.php?p=3537690#p3537690