Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:And now the OP has resigned from the WA - don’t think this “attempt” will be going far any time soon.
Well this is now a shut case that won't be resurrected.
Advertisement
by Outer Sparta » Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:08 am
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:And now the OP has resigned from the WA - don’t think this “attempt” will be going far any time soon.
by Team Lennox » Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:34 am
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Herzgevenia wrote:The Reason we Nominate The Freeland of Rhandon Is because they Sneeky ways of trying to undermine the Region of Sardovia by Using roleplay, which is Allowed but, they use it to provoke other nations to break the no War Rule on Sardovia! For Example, On the region of Sardovia, War is temporaryly banned until we have a bigger Amount of Nations. However, Rhandon Tries to provoke nations to break the rules and Start a War, to cause nations to leave the region. And every time they are warned not to do it Again they Re-Offend, All Rhandon wants to do is to cause Small Regions to completely fall Apart.
I was planning to take this proposal to the Security council but I Don't Quality to post proposals yet.
A mass of illegal, grammatically horrible, rubbish. I said to read the rules. Did you? No, by the looks of it. I told you to see how Condemnations are formatted. Did you? No!
And for the sake of sanity use a frigging spell checker.
Do everyone a favour; set fire to this draft and bury the ashes in a deep, deep pit.
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:52 am
Team Lennox wrote:Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:A mass of illegal, grammatically horrible, rubbish. I said to read the rules. Did you? No, by the looks of it. I told you to see how Condemnations are formatted. Did you? No!
And for the sake of sanity use a frigging spell checker.
Do everyone a favour; set fire to this draft and bury the ashes in a deep, deep pit.
Okay then I am not going to defend this proposal but you don't need to be so fucking rude for fucks sake
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Team Lennox » Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:57 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:02 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Team Lennox » Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:05 am
by Outer Sparta » Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:13 am
Team Lennox wrote:Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:If you think I’m being abusive to the OP then report me to Moderation. As it was I attacked the proposal, not the proposer.
Well you haven't broken any rules so........ and besides I said I wouldn't support this prop.......
Edit:Sorry if I am bothering you in any way
by Team Lennox » Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:28 am
Outer Sparta wrote:Team Lennox wrote:Well you haven't broken any rules so........ and besides I said I wouldn't support this prop.......
Edit:Sorry if I am bothering you in any way
BBD's a regular in the SC forums and gives great advice on SC resolutions. With bad drafts like this one, he went right after the proposal itself.
by The Nacht Fleet » Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:57 am
Minskiev wrote:How the hell is that sig even allowed? That looks WAY larger than 8 lines.
by Team Lennox » Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:00 pm
Minskiev wrote:How the hell is that sig even allowed? That looks WAY larger than 8 lines.
by WayNeacTia » Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:26 pm
Team Lennox wrote:Okay then I am not going to defend this proposal but you don't need to be so fucking rude for fucks sake
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by North American Imperial State » Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:25 pm
by Honeydewistania » Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:31 pm
North American Imperial State wrote:I will never ever write GA or SC proposals due to how people are so toxic on these fourms, and thats saying something since I post alot on NSG and that place is pure toxic
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Empirical Switzerland » Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:33 pm
News: Swiss Man uses 'Fonduethrower' on cow test-subject, lethality confirmed, Priest gets drunk on Blood of Christ, claims he just couldn't handle the Jesusness, and War with Tupeia deemed 'inevitable'.
by North American Imperial State » Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:54 pm
Honeydewistania wrote:North American Imperial State wrote:I will never ever write GA or SC proposals due to how people are so toxic on these fourms, and thats saying something since I post alot on NSG and that place is pure toxic
Oh woe is me, we have lost yet another valuable member of those communities.
by Picairn » Sun Sep 20, 2020 8:58 pm
North American Imperial State wrote:Wow well done on being fucking condescending, just proved my point
by WayNeacTia » Sun Sep 20, 2020 9:26 pm
North American Imperial State wrote:I will never ever write GA or SC proposals due to how people are so toxic on these fourms, and thats saying something since I post alot on NSG and that place is pure toxic
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Honeydewistania » Sun Sep 20, 2020 11:56 pm
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Mathuvan Union » Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:10 am
Wayneactia wrote:North American Imperial State wrote:I will never ever write GA or SC proposals due to how people are so toxic on these fourms, and thats saying something since I post alot on NSG and that place is pure toxic
Then why are you posting here? We went through this little song and dance already when you guys were members of Old Zealand. Remember how well that worked out for members of your region
by North American Imperial State » Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:24 am
Wayneactia wrote:North American Imperial State wrote:I will never ever write GA or SC proposals due to how people are so toxic on these fourms, and thats saying something since I post alot on NSG and that place is pure toxic
Then why are you posting here? We went through this little song and dance already when you guys were members of Old Zealand. Remember how well that worked out for members of your region, when you decided to grace the forums with your pleasant demeanor? The OP was clearly explained the rules and where to read them. They chose to ignore that advice and henceforth are reaping their own rewards. Rolling in here and trying to up the ante with comments such as this that flame the whole community is not an advisable course of action.
Perhaps you will take the hint this time?
by Praeceps » Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:16 am
North American Imperial State wrote:Wayneactia wrote:Then why are you posting here? We went through this little song and dance already when you guys were members of Old Zealand. Remember how well that worked out for members of your region, when you decided to grace the forums with your pleasant demeanor? The OP was clearly explained the rules and where to read them. They chose to ignore that advice and henceforth are reaping their own rewards. Rolling in here and trying to up the ante with comments such as this that flame the whole community is not an advisable course of action.
Perhaps you will take the hint this time?
I wanted to learn and get involved in both the GA and SC but being a new member to the fourms I was met with huge nastyness and bully type behavior.
My 1st post I did here was I said BBD was right about a rule 4 ruling, what did I get, rude, obnoxious BS from you lot, does not take much to be civil.
Yes I understand the OP was given advice and they ignored it, I agree that they should fall flat on their face for that.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement