Kuriko wrote:I plan on submitting this today at some point.
Looks like this just reached quorum. Good luck.
Advertisement
by Electrum » Sun Jul 26, 2020 3:48 am
Kuriko wrote:I plan on submitting this today at some point.
by Bormiar » Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:30 am
SherpDaWerp wrote:I challenge you to find an editor that was elevated prior to writing a commendable quantity of issues, and doesn't give any feedback.
by SherpDaWerp » Sun Jul 26, 2020 4:18 pm
by SherpDaWerp » Sun Jul 26, 2020 5:48 pm
Bormiar wrote:SherpDaWerp wrote:Great, but Sanctaria is already commended, so the point is moot.
I'll say it again: someone is commendable or not commendable and issues written as an editor very rarely if ever make that difference.
Aside from that, GL with the proposal!
So, therefore, Sanctaria is not commendable, because the issues in the commend were written while he was an editor iirc. We have repeals for this sort of thing.
by Bormiar » Sun Jul 26, 2020 6:08 pm
SherpDaWerp wrote:snip
SherpDaWerp wrote:I challenge you to find an editor that was elevated prior to writing a commendable quantity of issues, and doesn't give any feedback (see Commend Trotterdam - giving GI feedback can be part of a Commend). Every Editor is commendable without going into their issues written while part of Staff, so why bother? There's zero use-case for commending Editorial actions, because if you want to commend an editor, you can commend their prior body of work without too much trouble.
SherpDaWerp wrote:But do you want a Commend, are you worthy of a Commend, and/or are people drafting you a Commend? With all due respect, personally the lack of significant interaction with the community (at least in my short memory of GI) would limit your commend-ability anyway.
by SherpDaWerp » Sun Jul 26, 2020 8:09 pm
gah, I gotta say, this is the most annoying point I've ever made... it's becoming quite a headache. Debating isn't my jam.
by Sanctaria » Mon Jul 27, 2020 8:28 am
SherpDaWerp wrote:They can still see that their issue was deleted from the pool and take action to salvage it.
by Otaku Stratus » Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:05 pm
by Urduvan Sultanate » Fri Jul 31, 2020 5:59 am
by Kuriko » Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:05 am
Urduvan Sultanate wrote:I don't mean to be rude but there are more important things than commending/condemning people.
by Honeydewistania » Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:36 pm
SherpDaWerp wrote:
- The Free Joy State - wrote 2 issues prior to their first edit. This could probably be spun similarly to CWA's Commend, with a bit of wink-wink nudge-nudge
- USS Monitor - wrote 6 issues prior to their first edit. This is probably a commendable quantity given feedback and community involvement, which, while they don't have an incredible amount, they probably have enough
- Caracasus - wrote 3 issues prior to their first edit, plus a GA resolution.
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Chan Island » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:06 am
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.
by Sedgistan » Sun Aug 02, 2020 10:28 am
Honeydewistania wrote:That's an interesting one, as all of Monitor's issues came after they were modded. Will they count? Mods might have access to the editing forum/inner workings/cabal, so it might be argued they have a upper hand. I don't know, maybe someone can clarify? Are normal mods' issues eligible?
by Tinhampton » Sun Aug 02, 2020 9:01 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement