Advertisement
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Thu Jul 16, 2020 2:42 am
by The Islands of Versilia » Thu Jul 16, 2020 2:58 am
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:Judges rule in favour of Shamima Begum being allowed back into the UK.
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:04 am
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:07 am
by The Islands of Versilia » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:09 am
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:The Islands of Versilia wrote:
That’s disappointing.
I think inevitable.
More details:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53427197
by The Islands of Versilia » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:09 am
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:10 am
by The Islands of Versilia » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:19 am
by CoraSpia » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:21 am
by CoraSpia » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:26 am
The Islands of Versilia wrote:
So the government’s saying that it won’t assist her in getting out of Syria, but it won’t impede her entering the UK to challenge her revoked citizenship? That’s the basis of it, yeah?
I guess she can challenge it but I won’t be pleased if she gets it back. She’s a traitor and a terrorist-by-association.
by The Islands of Versilia » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:30 am
CoraSpia wrote:The Islands of Versilia wrote:
So the government’s saying that it won’t assist her in getting out of Syria, but it won’t impede her entering the UK to challenge her revoked citizenship? That’s the basis of it, yeah?
I guess she can challenge it but I won’t be pleased if she gets it back. She’s a traitor and a terrorist-by-association.
What crime do you think she's committed?
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:35 am
by Agarntrop » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:41 am
CoraSpia wrote:The Islands of Versilia wrote:
So the government’s saying that it won’t assist her in getting out of Syria, but it won’t impede her entering the UK to challenge her revoked citizenship? That’s the basis of it, yeah?
I guess she can challenge it but I won’t be pleased if she gets it back. She’s a traitor and a terrorist-by-association.
What crime do you think she's committed?
by Hirota » Thu Jul 16, 2020 3:56 am
Then she surely should be put on trial by her peers and ultimately punished under that legislation if found guilty rather than kept at arms length?
by CoraSpia » Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:11 am
The Islands of Versilia wrote:CoraSpia wrote:What crime do you think she's committed?
She joined ISIL. By doing so, she rejected British values and made herself a traitor to the United Kingdom and its people. Even if she hasn’t killed anyone personally, she’s a criminal by association and her joining ISIL means she’s condoned all its atrocities.
by Greed and Death » Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:23 am
by The Blaatschapen » Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:41 am
by Agarntrop » Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:41 am
by Philjia » Thu Jul 16, 2020 5:29 am
by Ostroeuropa » Thu Jul 16, 2020 5:35 am
Philjia wrote:British terrorists should be tried in British courts. Foisting her on Bangladesh was an intensely dishonourable act by the government.
by Dumb Ideologies » Thu Jul 16, 2020 5:43 am
by Ostroeuropa » Thu Jul 16, 2020 5:51 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:We don't want her back. It cannot be because she's an uncontainable threat particularly since there are a number of people in prison or under observation already and we haven't left them to rot.
I would wager that people would be far happier inviting her back to look at the case if the death penalty were an option in the event of her being found guilty but for some reason we like to pretend we don't believe in this even as we say she's lost the right to live as a Brit and many no doubt silently hoped that disease would do the work for us in that camp.
I don't like this veneer of flimflam but that's what you get when politics is an endlessly iterating game of handbags between two ugly boybands trying to confidence trick everyone that they're pretty.
by Gormwood » Thu Jul 16, 2020 5:51 am
by Ostroeuropa » Thu Jul 16, 2020 5:53 am
Gormwood wrote:So how many British terrorists who committed more severe terror crimes than run off to join a terrorist failstate- possibly on UK soil- were deported to a foreign country afterwards?
by CoraSpia » Thu Jul 16, 2020 5:55 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:We don't want her back. It cannot be because she's an uncontainable threat particularly since there are a number of people in prison or under observation already and we haven't left them to rot.
I would wager that people would be far happier inviting her back to look at the case if the death penalty were an option in the event of her being found guilty but for some reason we like to pretend we don't believe in this even as we say she's lost the right to live as a Brit and many no doubt silently hoped that disease would do the work for us in that camp.
I don't like this veneer of flimflam but that's what you get when politics is an endlessly iterating game of handbags between two ugly boybands trying to confidence trick everyone that they're pretty.
Given that she is a war criminal, I'm broadly fine with the death penalty. I don't support it for civilian activities.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Keltionialang, Omphalos, Phoeniae, Shrillland, The Lone Alliance, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan, Unmet Player
Advertisement