by Servilis » Sat Jul 11, 2020 3:40 am
by Ardiveds » Sat Jul 11, 2020 4:38 am
by Keswickholt » Sat Jul 11, 2020 7:50 am
by Wallenburg » Sat Jul 11, 2020 9:14 am
Keswickholt wrote:Ambassadors need to understand that there are other nations that do not think the same way and will be against the proposal for whatever reason. To try and push a political point of view is more damaging to the WA than you might think.
by Ardiveds » Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:58 pm
Keswickholt wrote:Ambassadors need to understand that there are other nations that do not think the same way and will be against the proposal for whatever reason. To try and push a political point of view is more damaging to the WA than you might think.
by WayNeacTia » Sat Jul 11, 2020 7:01 pm
Servilis wrote:Just reminding you all that a common mistake among new WA resolution proposers, myself included, is to use "NatSov" as an argument to repeal.
What is NatSov, you ask?
NatSov in the context of WA just means that the repeal argues that the proposal infringes on the laws and guidelines of a nation.
However, it must be mentioned that if you join the WA, you are inclined to follow it's rules.
If you don't want the WA to govern your nation's laws and policies, then you shouldn't be in the WA in the first place.
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Araraukar » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:52 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Honeydewistania » Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:54 am
Araraukar wrote:What the frick is PSA? Psoriasis Sufferers Alliance? Discussion threads here are marked as [Discussion].
And NatSov violation is when the repeal argument can be boiled down to "the WA is taking away my right to decide what I do with my nation and my people" with emphasis on the "my right", as it's more commonly a player whine, even if put in IC words.
As for what National Sovereignity means as a concept, I'm sure you'll find something easy to understand if you look it up in Wikipedia. Just be aware that it has a bit different meaning on this forum.
I've personally always thought of the modern NatSov and IntFed positions in GA to work like EU and USA; the first position is characterized by nations voluntarily working together and having a lot of say in the decisions made that address the lot of them; while the latter actually seeks coalescing into a single entity with a central government - with the separate bits maintaining only a little leeway in some disjointed choices such as age limits - where they might still have their own governments, but basically what the central government wants, it gets.
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Araraukar » Sun Jul 12, 2020 2:12 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Honeydewistania » Sun Jul 12, 2020 2:19 am
Araraukar wrote:Honeydewistania wrote:I think PSA is Public Service Announcement (unless you were being sarcastic)
Non-native English user, so no, it wasn't obvious, but since such announcements should be made by mods (or other actual authorities) only, not people who misunderstand how the proposal rules work, it should still be renamed to Discussion.
Edit: "Ted Talk" is another cultural miss, unless that's an IC character's name, but discussion threads are OOC space so that doesn't make sense either.
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Kenmoria » Sun Jul 12, 2020 2:27 am
Araraukar wrote:Honeydewistania wrote:I think PSA is Public Service Announcement (unless you were being sarcastic)
Non-native English user, so no, it wasn't obvious, but since such announcements should be made by mods (or other actual authorities) only, not people who misunderstand how the proposal rules work, it should still be renamed to Discussion.
Edit: "Ted Talk" is another cultural miss, unless that's an IC character's name, but discussion threads are OOC space so that doesn't make sense either.
by The Palentine » Sun Jul 12, 2020 3:08 am
Servilis wrote:Just reminding you all that a common mistake among new WA resolution proposers, myself included, is to use "NatSov" as an argument to repeal.
What is NatSov, you ask?
NatSov in the context of WA just means that the repeal argues that the proposal infringes on the laws and guidelines of a nation.
However, it must be mentioned that if you join the WA, you are inclined to follow it's rules.
If you don't want the WA to govern your nation's laws and policies, then you shouldn't be in the WA in the first place.
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
by Keswickholt » Sun Jul 12, 2020 9:26 am
by Blueflarst » Sun Jul 12, 2020 9:28 am
Servilis wrote:Just reminding you all that a common mistake among new WA resolution proposers, myself included, is to use "NatSov" as an argument to repeal.
What is NatSov, you ask?
NatSov in the context of WA just means that the repeal argues that the proposal infringes on the laws and guidelines of a nation.
However, it must be mentioned that if you join the WA, you are inclined to follow it's rules.
If you don't want the WA to govern your nation's laws and policies, then you shouldn't be in the WA in the first place.
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
by Ardiveds » Sun Jul 12, 2020 9:35 am
Blueflarst wrote:Servilis wrote:Just reminding you all that a common mistake among new WA resolution proposers, myself included, is to use "NatSov" as an argument to repeal.
What is NatSov, you ask?
NatSov in the context of WA just means that the repeal argues that the proposal infringes on the laws and guidelines of a nation.
However, it must be mentioned that if you join the WA, you are inclined to follow it's rules.
If you don't want the WA to govern your nation's laws and policies, then you shouldn't be in the WA in the first place.
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
The World Assembly included the raiding systemand the postion on Assembly of my region there are other motives to stay on
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Freedom4thepeople, Wallenburg, Warkland
Advertisement