by Staypuftonia » Thu Jul 09, 2020 10:59 am
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:00 am
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:01 am
by Staypuftonia » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:02 am
by Middle Barael » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:06 am
by Staypuftonia » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:09 am
by Imperium Anglorum » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:11 am
by Staypuftonia » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:15 am
by Middle Barael » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:21 am
Staypuftonia wrote:OOC:
https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/arti ... otes2.html
https://thefederalist.com/2017/10/13/li ... tment-hhs/
Also, you're OK with people using "pro choice" but you're NOT OK with "pro life"?
by Ardiveds » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:41 am
by Union of Sovereign States and Republics » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:45 am
News: BREAKING NEWS: Unceremoniously, USSR officially departs from the European Union 2 years before schedule
by Staypuftonia » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:48 am
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:49 am
by Morover » Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:05 pm
Staypuftonia wrote:"Not all rape victims say they've suffered after birth of the baby. In fact, they even love their baby. Most Staypuftonian rape victims love their babies."
by Godular » Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:55 pm
by Staypuftonia » Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:58 pm
Morover wrote:Staypuftonia wrote:"Not all rape victims say they've suffered after birth of the baby. In fact, they even love their baby. Most Staypuftonian rape victims love their babies."
"Have they said this under threat of injury? Because either you've selectively chosen your sample for that 'fact' or you're just lying. Additionally, 'not all suffered' is not an adequate measure for whether or not people should be protected from possible suffering."
by Union of Sovereign States and Republics » Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:59 pm
Staypuftonia wrote:Morover wrote:"Have they said this under threat of injury? Because either you've selectively chosen your sample for that 'fact' or you're just lying. Additionally, 'not all suffered' is not an adequate measure for whether or not people should be protected from possible suffering."
Not under threat.
I only chose my sample because it is one of many examples.
News: BREAKING NEWS: Unceremoniously, USSR officially departs from the European Union 2 years before schedule
by Ardiveds » Thu Jul 09, 2020 1:10 pm
Staypuftonia wrote:"Not all rape victims say they've suffered after birth of the baby. In fact, they even love their baby. Most Staypuftonian rape victims love their babies. Also, once the egg has been fertilized, the life has begun."
by Staypuftonia » Thu Jul 09, 2020 1:11 pm
by Kenmoria » Thu Jul 09, 2020 1:13 pm
by Staypuftonia » Thu Jul 09, 2020 1:14 pm
by Kenmoria » Thu Jul 09, 2020 1:16 pm
Staypuftonia wrote:OOC: What specifically is a more productive avenue of legislation? Pass this through the regional legislations? The Security Council?
by North Prarie » Thu Jul 09, 2020 1:22 pm
Staypuftonia wrote:OOC: What specifically is a more productive avenue of legislation? Pass this through the regional legislations? The Security Council?
SBT BottomLine-President Valieant welcomes first child Pax, Social Democrats gain big wins in Parliament elections, Lions win NPBL, Cavaliers win Prarie Hockey Cup, NPFA announces slow move away from world affairs
by Ardiveds » Thu Jul 09, 2020 1:30 pm
Staypuftonia wrote:"Alright, I am sorry, but what does this have to do with the rights of the baby? Also, why should babies have to suffer for the crimes of their father? At least in this country we have decency."
by Servilis » Thu Jul 09, 2020 1:34 pm
Staypuftonia wrote:The World Assembly,
NOTING that "child" and "baby" in this context refers to the unborn baby in the womb,
ASSERTING that it is the duty of all nations to protect their most innocent citizens,
ACCEPTING the controversy around banning abortion,
NEVERTHELESS convinced that it is inappropriate for innocent babies to be killed because they were conceived of rape or the reason that "it's not the right time", et cetera...;
THEREFORE:
1. REQUIRES the World Assembly to criminalize the despicable act of abortion where:
A. the child in question is conceived of rape and/or incest;
B. the reason for an abortion is not to save the life of the mother.
2. MANDATES that abortions are only to be legalised when the mother is in grave danger of death, and not in other cases.
3. FURTHER MANDATES that the same punishments for murder are to be applied to abortionists who do an abortion where the mother is not in grave danger of dying;
4. DECLARES that the baby should not need to die for the crimes of its father;
5. FURTHER DECLARES that the baby has a right to life, the same as all other humans;
6. FURTHER DECLARES that the life of a baby starts at conception, and not at birth.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Simone Republic
Advertisement