[Draft] REPEAL "Rights Of The Employed"

[Zaberaz Hapang]

General Assembly Resolution # 491 (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Acknowledging That Resolution #491 was a well-meaning article;

CONSIDERING That As it clarifies, there are different laws that protect workers, however, these rights actually don't have enough strength, don't change enough for a better cause and shall then be considered null and void.

NOTING That Maternity leave is not compulsory in all businesses and enterprises and therefore is forcing both nations and enterprises to apply them, and that may lead to an economic collapse of different industries.

FURTHER NOTING That D4 says that any worker shall be protected from any sanctions for protesting in a trial, from which it damages a business, it may even ruin it.

FURTHER CONSIDERING That E3 states that as not able to avoid breastfeeding in a workplace, enterprises must entitle parents to have private, safe, hygienic and ventilated areas, which it forces an enterprise to have, but then having maternity leave.

CONTINUING E1 is like E2 but can claim more time, together they would claim 12 weeks, which is a lot for a male worker, considered excessive.

Realizing That workers have same salaries but less work for up to a year, and should not happen.

The General Asembly hereby repeals the 'Rights Of The Employed' Resolution.

Co-Authored by Transvolcanic

[Honeydewistania]

Some typographical errors, get them checked out

[Zaberaz Hapang]

Some typographical errors, get them checked out

yes, sorry, I'm fixing them

[Honeydewistania]

Some typographical errors, get them checked out

yes, sorry, I'm fixing them

No need to apologise

[Kenmoria]

“I’ll have more feedback later. For the moment, it should be the General Assembly, not the Security Council, doing the repealing at the end. We don’t acknowledge the other chamber here.”

[Zaberaz Hapang]

“I’ll have more feedback later. For the moment, it should be the General Assembly, not the Security Council, doing the repealing at the end. We don’t acknowledge the other chamber here.”

what do you mean? it IS in the general assembly

[Kenmoria]

“I’ll have more feedback later. For the moment, it should be the General Assembly, not the Security Council, doing the repealing at the end. We don’t acknowledge the other chamber here.”

what do you mean? it IS in the general assembly

(OOC: Your final line, ‘The Security Council hereby repeals...’ should be ‘The General Assembly hereby repeals...’ or ‘The World Assembly hereby repeals...’, because it isn’t allowed to mention the SC in any form.)

[ZH Card Farm 2]

what do you mean? it IS in the general assembly

(OOC: Your final line, ‘The Security Council hereby repeals...’ should be ‘The General Assembly hereby repeals...’ or ‘The World Assembly hereby repeals...’, because it isn’t allowed to mention the SC in any form.)

you're right, my mistake, I'll correct it.

[Zaberaz Hapang]

Nobody else has comments?

[Araraukar]

Nobody else has comments?

OOC: Plenty of them:

CONSIDERING That As it clarifies, there are different laws that protect workers, however, this rights actually don't have enough strength, don't change enough for a better cause and shall then be considered null and void

Grammar atrocities.

NOTING That Maternity leave is not compulsory in all businesses and enterprises, and therefor is forcing both nations and enterprises to apply them, and that may lead to an economic collapse of different industries.

Spelling. And also I don't quite understand this. You say maternity leave is not compulsory but that it is compulsory and can thus lead to economic collapse?

FURTHER NOTING That D4 says that any worker shall be protected from any sanctions for protesting in a trial, from which if it damages a business, it may even ruin it.

Grammar atrocity.

FURTHER CONSIDERING That E3 states that as not able to avoid breastfeeding in a workplace, enterprises must entitle parents to have private, safe, hygienic and ventilated areas, which force an enterprise to have, but then having maternity leave doesn't work.

Grammar atrocities.

CONTINUING E1 is like E2 but can claim more time, together they would claim 12 weeks, which is a lot to a male worker, considered excessive

Grammar atrocities, the whole clause. And pretty much incomprehensive, too.

Realizing That workers have same salaries but less work for even a year, and should not happen like that, again, maternity paid leave

Grammar atrocities.

Co-Authored by Transvolcanic

Your co-author should help you more.

[Zaberaz Hapang]

Nobody else has comments?

OOC: Plenty of them:

CONSIDERING That As it clarifies, there are different laws that protect workers, however, this rights actually don't have enough strength, don't change enough for a better cause and shall then be considered null and void

Grammar atrocities.

NOTING That Maternity leave is not compulsory in all businesses and enterprises, and therefor is forcing both nations and enterprises to apply them, and that may lead to an economic collapse of different industries.

Spelling. And also I don't quite understand this. You say maternity leave is not compulsory but that it is compulsory and can thus lead to economic collapse?

FURTHER NOTING That D4 says that any worker shall be protected from any sanctions for protesting in a trial, from which if it damages a business, it may even ruin it.

Grammar atrocity.
thank you, I will try to correct the 'grammar atrocities'

FURTHER CONSIDERING That E3 states that as not able to avoid breastfeeding in a workplace, enterprises must entitle parents to have private, safe, hygienic and ventilated areas, which force an enterprise to have, but then having maternity leave doesn't work.

Grammar atrocities.

CONTINUING E1 is like E2 but can claim more time, together they would claim 12 weeks, which is a lot to a male worker, considered excessive

Grammar atrocities, the whole clause. And pretty much incomprehensive, too.

Realizing That workers have same salaries but less work for even a year, and should not happen like that, again, maternity paid leave

Grammar atrocities.

Co-Authored by Transvolcanic

Your co-author should help you more.

[Zaberaz Hapang]

Any other comments that aren't because of grammar or spelling?

[Anurial]

I'm confused at the reasoning for wanting to repeal the resolution. Does it not go far enough or is it too restrictive on business?

[Araraukar]

Any other comments that aren't because of grammar or spelling?

OOC: The grammar atrocities make it hard to understand what you're trying to say at all, hence pointing them out. Also, my post had a content question for you in it. Want to try to answer it? (Also, if you want, I can write "incomprehensible" at just about every case of grammar atrocities, but it wouldn't really be any more helpful.)

In other words, if you want comments that aren't about grammar, you need to fix the grammar so that people can figure out what the content is saying.

[Zaberaz Hapang]

I'm confused at the reasoning for wanting to repeal the resolution. Does it not go far enough or is it too restrictive on business?

Tbh Transvolcanic did all of the pointing out, all I did was the format because he didn't know how to, you know what? I give up

[Tinhampton]

Please mark your [ABANDONED] drafts accordingly. For future reference:

General Assembly Resolution # 491 (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Acknowledging That Resolution #491 was a well-meaning article;

CONSIDERING That As it clarifies, there are different laws that protect workers, however, these rights actually don't have enough strength, don't change enough for a better cause and shall then be considered null and void.

NOTING That Maternity leave is not compulsory in all businesses and enterprises and therefore is forcing both nations and enterprises to apply them, and that may lead to an economic collapse of different industries.

FURTHER NOTING That D4 says that any worker shall be protected from any sanctions for protesting in a trial, from which it damages a business, it may even ruin it.

FURTHER CONSIDERING That E3 states that as not able to avoid breastfeeding in a workplace, enterprises must entitle parents to have private, safe, hygienic and ventilated areas, which it forces an enterprise to have, but then having maternity leave.

CONTINUING E1 is like E2 but can claim more time, together they would claim 12 weeks, which is a lot for a male worker, considered excessive.

Realizing That workers have same salaries but less work for up to a year, and should not happen.

The General Asembly hereby repeals the 'Rights Of The Employed' Resolution.

Co-Authored by Transvolcanic