Rojava Free State wrote:Byeclase wrote:
The thread spreads bourgeois feminism and it can be seen in such names of the orgs like "business", "financial", etc. They just seek to enrich themselves like men do but it's the same selfish mentality that keeps this system of exploitation going on. This isn't surprising, the sufragettes, the feminist movement emerged as bourgeois and we're still capitalism, some want to deceive the people to fight for exploiter queens and the rich. Actually the feminist term emerged as derogatory because "women were trying to benefit women more than men" in the eyes of Alexandre Dumas instead of Fourier.
The bourgeoisie distorts the 8 day, saying "women's day". But actually it's the working women day, proposed by the leninist Clara Zetkin.
Capitalism consisted in making woman a complement of men in the house, subjugating intellectually women to the will of men and economically too through this division of work.
MRAs negate the historical structure of capitalism and its ideological masks in their role of subjugating women. They then point out individual cases of abuses against men and even structural ones like the deaths in the army. But all those "deaths" were created by the same structure inherited by a development of religion as ideology and the power of men, they created all those, the "men don't cry" is still an issue of being putting down the oppressive structure against women and not just a "men association against abuses". So, the role of MRAs is rightist and conservative even if they try to paint themselves as "pro-feminist"; because radicals already address that and know it originates from the same system which says women should do chores and "be flowers" while men have "to be tanks". Both the sanctification of toxic masculinity and "female weakness" are just faces of conservatism and rightism. If the male has been abused there's no need to push a whole "movement" and which is reserved only to men. A comrade of any kind, no matter the gender, can support the abused male; as well as if the abused one was a women, but the role of association in the latter is still "progressive" so to speak, even if it delays revolution through partialization of struggle, since the historically subjugation of women still exist, and that subjugation includes marking men as weak, it's inside the same struggle.
Sounds like what I told my friends. All these young black and brown youth wanna get the money to get power but that perpetuates the capitalist system. I on the other hand want to equalize society. Fuck "the first woman wallstreet executive" because the goal should be a more equal society for all and not a ruling class that looks a little more diverse.
Yep, can't fix oppression by having some of those part of groups repressed by their own form of it have the opportunity to be on top.
Doesn't solve the underlying problem of oppression by those on top harming men, women, non-straights, blacks, whites, all the different groups which have brown skin, etc.